-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.01
0.0127447145 = product of:
0.0446065 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0343532 = product of:
0.0687064 = sum of:
0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0687064 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989)
0.01
0.0127447145 = product of:
0.0446065 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0343532 = product of:
0.0687064 = sum of:
0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0687064 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
-
Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993)
0.00
0.0034888082 = product of:
0.024421657 = sum of:
0.024421657 = product of:
0.06105414 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
-
Kantor, P.B.; Voorhees, E.: Information retrieval with scanned texts (2000)
0.00
0.0023674043 = product of:
0.01657183 = sum of:
0.01657183 = product of:
0.08285914 = sum of:
0.08285914 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08285914 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information retrieval. 2(2000), S.165-176
-
Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000)
0.00
0.0021032572 = product of:
0.0147228 = sum of:
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Bett, C.E.: ¬The Subject Access Project : a comparison with PRECIS (1979)
0.00
0.0018148007 = product of:
0.012703604 = sum of:
0.012703604 = product of:
0.06351802 = sum of:
0.06351802 = weight(_text_:system in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06351802 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Preserved Context Index System (PRECIS)
-
Wormell, I.: Factual data retrieval according to SAP-technique (1983)
0.00
0.0016740077 = product of:
0.011718053 = sum of:
0.011718053 = product of:
0.058590267 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Wormell, I.: Factual data retrieval according to SAP technique (1983)
0.00
0.0016740077 = product of:
0.011718053 = sum of:
0.011718053 = product of:
0.058590267 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Dillon, M.: Enhanced bibliographic record retrieval experiments (1989)
0.00
0.0016740077 = product of:
0.011718053 = sum of:
0.011718053 = product of:
0.058590267 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Means to improve subject access and representation in modern information retrieval (1988)
0.00
0.0016740077 = product of:
0.011718053 = sum of:
0.011718053 = product of:
0.058590267 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Dillon, M.; Wenzel, P.: Retrieval effectiveness of enhanced bibliographic records (1990)
0.00
0.0016740077 = product of:
0.011718053 = sum of:
0.011718053 = product of:
0.058590267 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981)
0.00
0.0014647568 = product of:
0.010253297 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991)
0.00
0.0014021716 = product of:
0.0098152 = sum of:
0.0098152 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0196304 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 17:22:25
-
Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992)
0.00
0.0010873 = product of:
0.0076110996 = sum of:
0.0076110996 = product of:
0.0380555 = sum of:
0.0380555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380555 = score(doc=2230,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001)
0.00
0.0010873 = product of:
0.0076110996 = sum of:
0.0076110996 = product of:
0.0380555 = sum of:
0.0380555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380555 = score(doc=5421,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
-
Diodato, V.P.: Author indexing (1981)
0.00
0.0010462549 = product of:
0.007323784 = sum of:
0.007323784 = product of:
0.03661892 = sum of:
0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03661892 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors
-
Makinen, R.H.; Friesen B.: Enhancing online bibliographic records to improve retrieval of reference collection monographs (1995)
0.00
0.0010462549 = product of:
0.007323784 = sum of:
0.007323784 = product of:
0.03661892 = sum of:
0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03661892 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986)
0.00
8.877766E-4 = product of:
0.006214436 = sum of:
0.006214436 = product of:
0.03107218 = sum of:
0.03107218 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03107218 = score(doc=3926,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
-
Beatty, S.: ESP at ADFA after five years (1991)
0.00
8.3700387E-4 = product of:
0.0058590267 = sum of:
0.0058590267 = product of:
0.029295133 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=4245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Since Dec 86, the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) library has been enriching bibliographic records by adding terms from either the contents pages or indexes of books. 40.000 records are now enriched, representing about 25% coverage of the ADFA database of 210.000 titles. Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of the enriched data in an OPAC, in comparison with title and LCSH, using 90 topics from 6 different subject areas
-
Peis, E.; Fernandez-Molina, J.C.: Enrichment of bibliographic records of online catalogs through ORC and SGML technology (1998)
0.00
7.9397525E-4 = product of:
0.0055578267 = sum of:
0.0055578267 = product of:
0.027789133 = sum of:
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=3385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports results of research into the feasibility of using OCR scanner technology to capture contents pages of collective monographs and to extract the bibliographic information of each individual work and process this using a standardized language, such as SGML, for tagging electronic documents. By this means, data can be used as electronic information or stored in OPACs, thus providing additional access points. Outlines a pilot system to test the initial hypotheses, show the feasibility of achieving the suggested goals and develop the tasks required for them to be carried out as automatically as possible
