Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Piascik, J.M.: Enhanced subject access in Ohio public libraries (1993) 0.01 
    0.014929015 = product of:
  0.08957409 = sum of:
    0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006110009 = score(doc=6965,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
    0.027070139 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027070139 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.33305797 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
    0.027070139 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027070139 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.33305797 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
    0.027070139 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027070139 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.33305797 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of a survey of heads of cataloging in Ohio public libraries. The survey focused on subject enhancements in automated catalogs. Results reveal that additional subject access points and more anaytical entries ranked as the most useful enhancements for patrons. These enhancements were seen as less useful for technical services staff.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.4, S.77-91
  2. Advances in online public access catalogs : Vol.1 (1992) 0.00 
    0.0013833886 = product of:
  0.013833886 = sum of:
    0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004409519 = score(doc=4653,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
    0.006274772 = product of:
      0.018824315 = sum of:
        0.018824315 = weight(_text_:l in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018824315 = score(doc=4653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0031495956 = weight(_text_:s in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031495956 = score(doc=4653,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.13430263 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 19(1993) no.3, S.170 (R.P. Holley); Library revies 42(1993) no.5, S.70-71 (D. Anderson) // Jährliche Publikation angekündigt
    Pages
    190 S
    Type
    s
  3. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.00 
    0.0013548408 = product of:
  0.013548408 = sum of:
    0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006110009 = score(doc=520,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.0015935833 = weight(_text_:s in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0015935833 = score(doc=520,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.005844816 = product of:
      0.011689632 = sum of:
        0.011689632 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011689632 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.157-187
  4. Michalak, T.J.: ¬An experiment in enhancing catalog records at Carnegie Mellon University (1990) 0.00 
    6.7448284E-4 = product of:
  0.010117242 = sum of:
    0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 2066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061733257 = score(doc=2066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2066)
    0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 2066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003943917 = score(doc=2066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2066)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 8(1990) no.3, issue 31, S.33-41
  5. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.00 
    6.355139E-4 = product of:
  0.009532709 = sum of:
    0.00756075 = weight(_text_:in in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00756075 = score(doc=4650,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 37(1993) no.2, S.167-180
  6. Beatty, S.: Table of contents or index data for subject enrichment : sources and developments (1993) 0.00 
    6.198117E-4 = product of:
  0.009297175 = sum of:
    0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006110009 = score(doc=3939,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
    0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031871665 = score(doc=3939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Outlines the present manual procedures at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library for subject enrichment with reference to the evaluation with reference to the evaluation study carried out in 1991. Investigates potential sources of contents and index data in machine readable form. Reports of the Monographic Table of Contents Project at OCLC and on the latest developments in USMARC format for contents page data
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 19(1993) no.1, S.16-29
  7. Cataloguing for online access : 9th National Cataloguing Conference, papers presented Nov. 28-30 1991 (1991) 0.00 
    6.1925675E-4 = product of:
  0.009288851 = sum of:
    0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004409519 = score(doc=1785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
    0.0048793326 = weight(_text_:s in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048793326 = score(doc=1785,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.20806074 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Editor
    Clarke, S. et al.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Australian academic & research libraries. 24(1993) no.1, S.60-61 (J.S. Goodell)
    Type
    s
  8. ¬The subject enhancement of OPAC records and the need for multilingual access (1993) 0.00 
    6.0353905E-4 = product of:
  0.009053085 = sum of:
    0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006236001 = score(doc=4259,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
    0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0028170836 = score(doc=4259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Considers the potential of providing enhanced content indexing of document records either by natural language or PRECIS controlled vocabulary in order to provide more effective subject access to OPACs. Considers multilingual access OPACs. Controlled vocabulary is the best option for the latter in the short terms
    Source
    Vine. 1993, no.90, S.33-35
  9. Beatty, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms : the Australian Defence Force Academy experience (1992) 0.00 
    5.974731E-4 = product of:
  0.008962097 = sum of:
    0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061733257 = score(doc=4649,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
    0.0027887707 = weight(_text_:s in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027887707 = score(doc=4649,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    In 1986, all titles added to the collection at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library, are processed through their OPAC via a subject enhancement procedure (ESP). The procedure used for subject enhancement is based on the techniques developed by P.A. Atherton and B. Settel during the Subject Access Project at Syracuse Univ., 1977. Terms are selected from contents pages or the index of the book, depending on whether the terms are content bearing, and whether the terms refer to 5 or more pages of text. This results in the addition of an average of 73 words or 20 phrases to each MARC record. The terms are keyed into the MARC field 653 using in house modifications of the library's URICA system
    Pages
    S.93-104
    Source
    Advances in online public access catalogs. 1(1992)
  10. DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: Subject enhancements and OPACs : planning ahead (1990) 0.00 
    5.575784E-4 = product of:
  0.008363675 = sum of:
    0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006110009 = score(doc=4654,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    As librarians plan ahead to make subject enhancements available to online searchers in various possible file locations and formats, they may want to base their decisions on implications for online searching. This paper explores some of these implications with respect to unique and misleading terminology in tables of contents, Choice abstracts, and reviews from Computing reviews for thirty-six books on information and computer science chosen from the 1987 issues of Choice. It also discusses possible interacting functions in the search process served by these subject enhancements, assigned LCSH, and book title terminology
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 7(1990), S.35-52
  11. Dwyer, J.: Bibliographic records enhancement : from the drawing board to the catalog screen (1991) 0.00 
    5.575784E-4 = product of:
  0.008363675 = sum of:
    0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006110009 = score(doc=514,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Contents notes can improve online access to works containing essays, short stories, and significantly titles chapters. Few records in bibliographic utilities include contents notes. The OCLC PRISM service may provide an opportunity to cooperatively build a contents-enriched database. This paper discusses some issues related to the creation of enhanced records and their display in online cataloges. It also describes one library's efforts to add contents notes lically and to participate in an anticipated OCLC pilot project
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.29-51
  12. Beatty, S.: ESP at ADFA after five years (1991) 0.00 
    5.450645E-4 = product of:
  0.008175967 = sum of:
    0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004988801 = score(doc=4245,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
    0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031871665 = score(doc=4245,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Since Dec 86, the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) library has been enriching bibliographic records by adding terms from either the contents pages or indexes of books. 40.000 records are now enriched, representing about 25% coverage of the ADFA database of 210.000 titles. Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of the enriched data in an OPAC, in comparison with title and LCSH, using 90 topics from 6 different subject areas
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 17(1991) nos. 3/4, S.65-92
  13. Kartus, E.: ¬A fully automated cataloguing workbench with enhanced subject access : the cataloguer's dream or nightmare? (1993) 0.00 
    5.447262E-4 = product of:
  0.0081708925 = sum of:
    0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0064806426 = score(doc=4651,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
    0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0016902501 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Describes the Intelligent Literature Search Assistant (ILSA) which demonstrates the possibilities of a fully automated cataloguing workbench in an object orientated environment. Although developed with OPAC users in mind, it can be very useful to cataloguers in aiding both classification and subject heading access. Also describes work done at the University of Strathclyde in the area of machine learning and knowledge based systems, the Structured Information Management: Processing and Retrieval project (SIMPR). Advocates the use of uncontrolled vocabulary headings in conjunction with systems like ILSA, a layered approach rather than direct first point access, in order to make subject cataloguing easier and more relevant and the subject catalogue more useful to others
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 19(1993) nos. 3/4, S.209-221
  14. Syracuse, R.O.; Poyer, R.K.: Enhancing access to the library's collections : a view from an academy health center library (1991) 0.00 
    4.8788113E-4 = product of:
  0.0073182164 = sum of:
    0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053462577 = score(doc=516,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.93-90
  15. O'Brien, A.: Online catalogs : enhancements and developments (1994) 0.00 
    4.8283124E-4 = product of:
  0.007242468 = sum of:
    0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004988801 = score(doc=3730,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    State of the art review of enhancements in online catalogues over a 3 year period, taking for granted those features that are now standard and mainly discussing issues related to problem areas, in particular, subject access and user searching behaviour, as well as new developments that directly impinge on the catalogue's future: new interface developments and network access and resources
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 29(1994), S.219-242
  16. Knutson, G.: Subject enhancement : report on an experiment (1991) 0.00 
    4.8283124E-4 = product of:
  0.007242468 = sum of:
    0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004988801 = score(doc=4648,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    This report describes an experiment in subject enhancement conducted at an academic research library. Subjects and contents notes were added to online catalog records for a group of previously uncirculated social science essay collections, and circulation was monitored over one academic year. A control group, plus a third group with added contents notes but no extra subjects, were also monitored. Results showed an improvement in recorded use for the subject-enhanced titles, but not for titles that only had added contents notes. The effects of browsing, keyword searching, and OPAC display are discussed
    Source
    College and research libraries. 52(1991), S.65-79
  17. Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (1992) 0.00 
    4.8177355E-4 = product of:
  0.0072266026 = sum of:
    0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004409519 = score(doc=2124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
    0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0028170836 = score(doc=2124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Pages
    S.105-113
    Source
    Advances in online public access catalogs. 1(1992)
  18. Wormell, I.: Subject access redefinied : how new technology changes the conception of subject representation (1994) 0.00 
    4.2247731E-4 = product of:
  0.0063371593 = sum of:
    0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004365201 = score(doc=7741,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=7741,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    The paper examines the developmentss that have taken place during the last decade with respect to the provision of intellectual subject access in information databases storage. The principles of the SAP indexing methodology are outlined and exemplified, leading to a discussion of the consequences for the conception of the physical 'document' versus 'semantic entities' as the basic constructs for storage and multi-dimensional representation of subject matter. Finally, the paper analyzes the impact of very recent technologies which make achievable such access conceptions and mechanisms
    Pages
    S.431-439
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.4
  19. Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993) 0.00 
    3.854188E-4 = product of:
  0.0057812817 = sum of:
    0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003527615 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
    Source
    Education libraries journal. 36(1993) no.3, S.7-27
  20. Peis, E.; Fernandez-Molina, J.C.: Enrichment of bibliographic records of online catalogs through ORC and SGML technology (1998) 0.00 
    3.3724142E-4 = product of:
  0.005058621 = sum of:
    0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0030866629 = score(doc=3385,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=3385,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    Abstract
    Reports results of research into the feasibility of using OCR scanner technology to capture contents pages of collective monographs and to extract the bibliographic information of each individual work and process this using a standardized language, such as SGML, for tagging electronic documents. By this means, data can be used as electronic information or stored in OPACs, thus providing additional access points. Outlines a pilot system to test the initial hypotheses, show the feasibility of achieving the suggested goals and develop the tasks required for them to be carried out as automatically as possible
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.3, S.161-172

Authors

Types

  • a 24
  • s 2

Themes