Search (47 results, page 3 of 3)

0.002231347 = product of:
  0.017850775 = sum of:
    0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017850775 = score(doc=3459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Source

Journal of academic librarianship. 26(2000) no.5, S.359-363

0.0021828816 = product of:
  0.017463053 = sum of:
    0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017463053 = score(doc=516,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.

0.0019722506 = product of:
  0.015778005 = sum of:
    0.015778005 = weight(_text_:of in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015778005 = score(doc=4653,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 19(1993) no.3, S.170 (R.P. Holley); Library revies 42(1993) no.5, S.70-71 (D. Anderson) // Jährliche Publikation angekündigt

0.0019324032 = product of:
  0.0154592255 = sum of:
    0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0154592255 = score(doc=1067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information

0.0016735102 = product of:
  0.013388081 = sum of:
    0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013388081 = score(doc=6583,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Considers characteristics of online catalogue records which have been inherited from card catalogue systems and which should be removed. Considers display style, abbreviations, brevity, and uniformity. Examines possible enhancements to online records. Covers: retrievability, added information, browsability and interactivity

0.0011156735 = product of:
  0.008925388 = sum of:
    0.008925388 = weight(_text_:of in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008925388 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Contents notes can improve online access to works containing essays, short stories, and significantly titles chapters. Few records in bibliographic utilities include contents notes. The OCLC PRISM service may provide an opportunity to cooperatively build a contents-enriched database. This paper discusses some issues related to the creation of enhanced records and their display in online cataloges. It also describes one library's efforts to add contents notes lically and to participate in an anticipated OCLC pilot project

9.762143E-4 = product of:
  0.0078097144 = sum of:
    0.0078097144 = weight(_text_:of in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0078097144 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

This study examines users' needs for bibliographic enhancement data (BIBED) in academic library catalogs. Qualitative data were collected through 30 academic users' activity logs and follow-up interviews. These 30 participants were recruited from a public university in the United States that has over 19,000 students enrolled and over 600 full-time faculty members. This study identified 19 types of BIBED useful for supporting the five user tasks proposed in the IFLA Library Reference Model and in seven other contexts, such as enhancing one's understanding, offering search instructions, and providing readers' advisory. Findings suggest that adopting BIBFRAME and Semantic Web technologies may enable academic library catalogs to provide BIBED to better meet user needs in various contexts.