Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.05
    0.053071506 = product of:
      0.10614301 = sum of:
        0.10614301 = sum of:
          0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049684722 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
          0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056458294 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  2. McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996) 0.05
    0.04643757 = product of:
      0.09287514 = sum of:
        0.09287514 = sum of:
          0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043474134 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
          0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049401004 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
  3. Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997) 0.04
    0.03960097 = product of:
      0.07920194 = sum of:
        0.07920194 = sum of:
          0.043915503 = weight(_text_:libraries in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043915503 = score(doc=605,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
          0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035286434 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Pays tribute to the recent advances in the ability to access computerized catalogues from the desktop via the Internet but emphasizes that there are problems still to be overcome before the ideal of universal access to catalogue records for UK libraries is achieved. Advances in computerized cataloguing over the past 40 years have been an obstacle to retrospective cataloguing in a coherent and standardized manner which even the adoption of common standards for information retrieval and the Z39.50 protocol have failed to prevent. Many libraries with modern methods for cataloguing new materials still have earlier sequences of records on microfiche or other hard copy format. Other specialized collections are such that they have never been catalogued to professional standards or in a convenient format. Illustrates the point with reference to practical searching of catalogues in Aberystwyth, Wales, and to 2 studies of the logistical and financial issues of a programme of retrospective cataloguing as reported in BLRIC report 53. Discusses the proposed UK coordinating body and coordinated natioanl prgramme, to select which catalogues should be converted, set priorities for work, ensure maintenance of requisite standards, and arrange collaboration between neighbouring or related institutions
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  4. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.03
    0.028229147 = product of:
      0.056458294 = sum of:
        0.056458294 = product of:
          0.11291659 = sum of:
            0.11291659 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11291659 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  5. Bryant, P.: Making the most of our libraries (1997) 0.02
    0.021737067 = product of:
      0.043474134 = sum of:
        0.043474134 = product of:
          0.08694827 = sum of:
            0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08694827 = score(doc=2439,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the 2 studies: "Retrospective conversion of library catalogues in institutions of higher education in the United Kingdom: a study of the justification for a national programme" and "Retrospective conversion for libraries in the UK other than those funded by the Higher Education Funding Councils". The latter study was on behalf of libraries other than national ones: public; learned and scientific society; professional; and religious. Covers: the scale of UK retrospective conversion issues, opportunities and need for a national strategy; retrospective conversion in an international context; conversion of library catalogues in UK higher education institutions; and catalogues in other UK libraries
  6. Feldman, S.: ¬The key to online catalogs that work? (1999) 0.02
    0.021737067 = product of:
      0.043474134 = sum of:
        0.043474134 = product of:
          0.08694827 = sum of:
            0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08694827 = score(doc=6467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 6467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.16-18
  7. Oddy, P.: Future libraries, future catalogues (1996) 0.02
    0.021514116 = product of:
      0.04302823 = sum of:
        0.04302823 = product of:
          0.08605646 = sum of:
            0.08605646 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08605646 = score(doc=1988,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Libraries / Automation
    Subject
    Libraries / Automation
  8. Albrechtsen, H.: ¬The order of catalogues : towards democratic classification and indexing in public libraries (1998) 0.02
    0.018824851 = product of:
      0.037649702 = sum of:
        0.037649702 = product of:
          0.075299405 = sum of:
            0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075299405 = score(doc=2099,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 2099, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how classification systems have developed to perform the work of articulation in electronic libraries as exemplified by projects involving cooperative design of classificatory structures and democratic classification and indexing. Delineates the stages in this evolution and focuses on the mutual design activity of libraries and users which took place in the development of an enriched multimedia catalogue on the WWW at Ballerup public library in Denmark and on research in england into the democratic indexing of images and fiction. Although recent projects are promising it is important to avoid a mechanistic concept of knowledge and maintain a social view
  9. Kevil, L.H.: ¬The paper library : beyond the automated card catalog (1998) 0.02
    0.018824851 = product of:
      0.037649702 = sum of:
        0.037649702 = product of:
          0.075299405 = sum of:
            0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075299405 = score(doc=5187,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Without reform and adaptation to contemporary technology, existing paper libraries may become increasingly marginalized and eventually little more than book museums. Proposes a new method to organize access to paper resources by using relational database management systems technology to change libraries' existing data structures and concepts of organization of materials in order to create an open, shared, easy-to-use and cooperatively maintained system. Without substantial proactive change, users familiar with accessing and manipulating digital materials will become very intolerant of the anomalies and archaisms of libraries' card-based automated catalogues. Outlines the benefits of such a system and lists considerations which should be taken into account in its design
  10. Vellucci, S.L.: Future catalogues : essential colleagues or anachronisms? (1996) 0.02
    0.017566202 = product of:
      0.035132404 = sum of:
        0.035132404 = product of:
          0.07026481 = sum of:
            0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07026481 = score(doc=5748,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 5748, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the future of the cataloguer in an increasingly electronic environment arguing that this future will depend on adopting a more holistic approach that broadens the concept from cataloguing to the organization of information. If the goal of libraries is to provide access to information it is the organizational tools created by cataloguers that help meet this goal. Cataloguers must be aware of the potential uses of information and how it may be exploited and administrators must capitalize on cataloguers' expertise when information systems based on their work are developed
    Source
    College and research libraries news. 57(1996) no.7, S.442-443
  11. Oddy, P.: Who dares, wins : libraries and catalogues for a postmodern world (1997) 0.02
    0.017566202 = product of:
      0.035132404 = sum of:
        0.035132404 = product of:
          0.07026481 = sum of:
            0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07026481 = score(doc=603,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Places present day UK culture and society in a postmodern context and considers their impact and cataloguing, concentrating specifically on the concepts of globalization and the death of tradition. Discusses how libraries can continue to provide high quality, structured access to their collections and the need for strategic management of this process. Emphasizes the importance of defining what the library want to achieve, setting objectives, and maintaining the capacity for flexible response to changing conditions, using as a case study the development and implementation of the British Library cataloguing strategy
  12. Tennant, R.: 21st century cataloguing (1998) 0.02
    0.017566202 = product of:
      0.035132404 = sum of:
        0.035132404 = product of:
          0.07026481 = sum of:
            0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07026481 = score(doc=2584,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Observes how traditional cataloguing differs from the use of metadata to describe the materials in a digital library. Introduces the 3 categories of metadata that have been identified: descriptive (also called intellectual), structural, and administrative. Notes that MARC only deals well with intellectual metadata. Discusses some emerging standards that may be to digital libraries what MARC was to print libraries, the best of these being the Dublin Core
  13. Oddy, P.: ¬The case for international cooperation in cataloguing : from copy cataloguing to multilingual subject access - experiences within the British Library (1999) 0.02
    0.017566202 = product of:
      0.035132404 = sum of:
        0.035132404 = product of:
          0.07026481 = sum of:
            0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07026481 = score(doc=5181,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an outline of a cataloguing strategy that might be adopted for the with reference to how such a strategy is being implemented at the British Library. The first stage has involved cooperation with US libraries and future plans are linked to cooperation with European libraries. Such developments involve countries with different languages and different cataloguing cultures and so present many challenges. Discusses the skills required by staff needed to implement the cataloguing strategy
  14. Ballard, T.: Spelling and typographical errors in library databases (1992) 0.02
    0.015526476 = product of:
      0.031052953 = sum of:
        0.031052953 = product of:
          0.062105905 = sum of:
            0.062105905 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062105905 = score(doc=5971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 5971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 12(1992) no.6, S.14-19
  15. Stevens, N.D.: Looking back at looking ahead, or "The catalogs of the future revisited" with additional speculations (1998) 0.02
    0.015370426 = product of:
      0.030740852 = sum of:
        0.030740852 = product of:
          0.061481703 = sum of:
            0.061481703 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061481703 = score(doc=4625,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 4625, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief reexamniation of the views expressed in the essay mentioned. That essay suggested that scholars, in particular, would have difficulty dealing with the mass of information available in the catalogues of the future and offered several suggestions for lessening their burdens. While those suggestion have not been adopted, it appears as though the mass of information now available from all sources, including library catalogues is far greater than anticipated. Offers further speculations about how libraries might best be involved in organizing access to information in the future
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.4, S.188-190
  16. Stankowski, R.H.: Bibliographic record maintenance and control in a consortium database (1990) 0.02
    0.015370426 = product of:
      0.030740852 = sum of:
        0.030740852 = product of:
          0.061481703 = sum of:
            0.061481703 = weight(_text_:libraries in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061481703 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    When an institution wishes to automate but does not have the financial resources to implement an online integrated system, one solution is to join forces with other libraries who have similar desires and needs. Since the online database is the foundation of all library automation, a shared database will be necessary in this type of cluster environment. This article discusses some of the problems encountered when bibliographic records are shared by a number of libraries, such as difficulties in information retrieval and bibliographic control. Possible methods of dealing with the problems of joint input and database maintenance are then proposed.
  17. Barrett, B.B.: Hit rates with the OCLC CD450 cataloging system : a test with recent, academic approval books (1990) 0.01
    0.013174651 = product of:
      0.026349302 = sum of:
        0.026349302 = product of:
          0.052698605 = sum of:
            0.052698605 = weight(_text_:libraries in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052698605 = score(doc=504,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The work begins by reviewing publications on the use of optical-disc technology in cataloging departments. This section includes descriptive information on specific products and comparative considerations on the value of the CD genre. Most commentary to date seems to find cost advantages to the optical format for smaller libraries but fewer attractions for larger institutions who would lose online immediacy. An outline of the design and results of the OCLC test follows along with various tables showing the class makeup of the overall sample, the hit-rate for the two vendors, and other data. Most of the sample consisted of English-language titles that would support the general academic mission of a variety of disciplines. Well over 90% of the titles searched had MARC records on discs within two issues or three months. Although concluding that departments acquiring over 5000 titles per year may find online utilities more effective, the article still urges a careful analysis of laser cataloging products with a variety of acquisition samples and for a variety of libraries.
  18. Frost, C.O.: Next-generation online public access catalogs : redefining territory and roles (1994) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=5527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 5527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of OPACs which suggests a model for their future development based on a redefinition of the roles previously served by the traditional catalogue. Notes the traditional role of library catalogues and considers the ways in which the catalogue's functions can be extended to provide access to the whole of the library 's resources including access to other libraries' collections
  19. Bryant, P.: Making the most of our libraries : library catalogue access: the issues and the opportunities (1997) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01
    0.012350251 = product of:
      0.024700502 = sum of:
        0.024700502 = product of:
          0.049401004 = sum of:
            0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049401004 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4