Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (2011) 0.03
    0.03355045 = product of:
      0.0671009 = sum of:
        0.010017424 = weight(_text_:in in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010017424 = score(doc=4530,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1686982 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
        0.036242798 = weight(_text_:und in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036242798 = score(doc=4530,freq=52.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.37458867 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
              7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
                52.0 = termFreq=52.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
        0.020840677 = product of:
          0.041681353 = sum of:
            0.041681353 = weight(_text_:ausbildung in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041681353 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23429902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3671665 = idf(docFreq=560, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.17789811 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3671665 = idf(docFreq=560, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Library specialists in the cataloging and metadata professions have a greater purpose than simply managing information and connecting users to resources. There is a deeper and more profound impact that comes of their work: preservation of the human record. Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century contains four chapters addressing broad categories of issues that catalogers and metadata librarians are currently facing. Every important topic is covered, such as changing metadata practices, standards, data record structures, data platforms, and user expectations, providing both theoretical and practical information. Guidelines for dealing with present challenges are based on fundamentals from the past. Recommendations on training staff, building new information platforms of digital library resources, documenting new cataloging and metadata competencies, and establishing new workflows enable a real-world game plan for improvement.
    Footnote
    Rez. in Mitt VÖB 64(2011) H.1, S.151-153 (S. Breitling): "Wie sieht die Rolle der Katalogisierung im 21. Jahrhundert aus? In diversen Blogs und Mailinglisten wird darüber seit geraumer Zeit diskutiert. Der Bereich Katalogisierung befindet sich in einer Phase tiefgreifenden Wandels, ausgelöst durch eine Vielzahl von Faktoren, von denen veränderte Nutzererwartungen bei der Recherche und die wachsende Menge an neuen zu katalogisierenden Materialien (e-Books, Web-Ressourcen etc.) und Formaten nur zwei Aspekte darstellen. Das technische Umfeld wird nicht zuletzt durch fortgeschrittene Möglichkeiten im Bereich Retrieval und Präsentation geprägt. Wie schafft man es, dass Katalogisierung als Teil des gesamten Bibliothekswesens relevant und zeitgemäß bleibt? Welche der in Jahrzehnten Katalogisierungspraxis erarbeiteten Standards sind erhaltenswert, und welche sind im Hinblick auf den Fortschritt der IT und ein mögliches Semantic Web vielleicht gar nicht mehr nötig oder müssen an die Gegebenheiten angepasst werden? Mit diesen und anderen Fragen beschäftigt sich die Aufsatzsammlung "Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century". In der Community bekannte Personen wie Martha Yee, Christine Schwartz oder James Weinheimer kommen zu Wort, aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum Bernhard Eversberg, Entwickler des Bibliothekssystems Allegro.
    Ein großes Thema ist erwartungsgemäß das neue Regelwerk RDA, das, um es vorwegzunehmen, bei den drei Autoren, die sich ausschließlich diesem Gesichtspunkt widmen, vorwiegend auf Kritik stößt. Erstmals publiziert wird an dieser Stelle eine Studie der Herausgeberin Elaine R. Sanchez, die ein Meinungsbild der einschlägig tätigen Bibliothekarinnen (wie z.B. Titelaufnehmerinnen, Systembibliothekarinnen) zum Umstieg auf RDA zeichnet. Wie in den anderen Kapiteln liegt auch hier der Schwerpunkt auf dem US- bzw. anglo-amerikanischen Raum, was einen Blick über den eigenen Tellerrand ermöglicht und eine Grundstimmung einfängt, der man auch in Europa und hierzulande angesichts internationaler Kooperationen und zunehmend globaler Ausrichtung bei Standards und Regelwerken Beachtung schenken sollte. Andere Beiträge setzen sich mit Themen auseinander, die ebenfalls die Rolle der Katalogisierung unter sich ständig und rasant verändernden Bedingungen betreffen: die Bedeutung von bibliographischen Standards (und Qualitätsstandards im besonderen) im Zeitalter von Google Books, das Titeldaten aus Bibliotheken "nur noch" in einem Mashup mit anderen algorithmisch aufbereiteten Daten verarbeitet; das sich wandelnde Berufsbild von Titelaufnehmerinnen, die mit traditionellen Materialien und Datenformaten arbeiten, hin zu Metadaten-Spezialisten, die sich durch Kenntnisse digitaler Objekte und der entsprechenden Formate wie etwa Dublin Core auszeichnen; Anpassung von Workflows an die technischen Möglichkeiten der Automatisierung und Digitalisierung; Anforderungen an Ausbildung und berufliche Weiterbildung von Katalogisierungsexpertinnen etc. Eine chronologische Bibliographie von Literatur mit Bezug auf Bibliotheken und Katalogisierung von 1800 bis heute beschließt den Band.
    Eine wiederkehrende positive Einschätzung ist, dass Katalogisiererinnen sich in der jüngeren Geschichte schon mehrmals Wandel und Veränderungen stellen mußten (z.B. Umstieg von Zettelkatalog auf EDV) und dies auch stets gut gemeistert haben. Allerdings muss man hier anmerken, dass neue Entwicklungen erst mit (großer) Verzögerung nachvollzogen wurden und Bibliotheken heute nicht mehr die einzigen sind, die bibliographische Daten bereitstellen. Es gilt also mehr denn je, sich als ein Player unter vielen zu positionieren und die Rolle neu zu definieren, die Bibliotheken (und vor allem die Katalogisierung als Rückgrat der Informationsversorgung) in einer veränderten Wissens- und Informationslandschaft spielen. Der vorliegende Titel kann hierzu Anregungen und Denkanstöße aus verschiedenen Blickwinkeln, wenn auch keine wirklich revolutionären Ansätze oder gar fertigen Lösungen liefern."
  2. Clarke, R.I.: Cataloging research by design : a taxonomic approach to understanding research questions in cataloging (2018) 0.01
    0.009484224 = product of:
      0.028452672 = sum of:
        0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010709076 = score(doc=5188,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
        0.017743597 = product of:
          0.035487194 = sum of:
            0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035487194 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article asserts that many research questions (RQs) in cataloging reflect design-based RQs, rather than traditional scientific ones. To support this idea, a review of existing discussions of RQs is presented to identify prominent types of RQs, including design-based RQs. RQ types are then classified into a taxonomic framework and compared with RQs from the Everyday Cataloger Concerns project, which aimed to identify important areas of research from the perspective of practicing catalogers. This comparative method demonstrates the ways in which the research areas identified by cataloging practitioners reflect design RQs-and therefore require design approaches and methods to answer them.
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:14:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Ethos of Care: A Festschrift for Dr. Allyson Carlyle at the Occasion of her Retirement'.
  3. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01
    0.008982609 = product of:
      0.026947826 = sum of:
        0.006246961 = weight(_text_:in in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006246961 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.020700864 = product of:
          0.04140173 = sum of:
            0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04140173 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  4. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01
    0.008863994 = product of:
      0.02659198 = sum of:
        0.011805649 = weight(_text_:in in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011805649 = score(doc=420,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.014786332 = product of:
          0.029572664 = sum of:
            0.029572664 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029572664 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  5. White, R.W.: Interactions with search systems (2016) 0.01
    0.007883994 = product of:
      0.02365198 = sum of:
        0.011805649 = weight(_text_:in in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011805649 = score(doc=3612,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.01184633 = weight(_text_:und in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01184633 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information seeking is a fundamental human activity. In the modern world, it is frequently conducted through interactions with search systems. The retrieval and comprehension of information returned by these systems is a key part of decision making and action in a broad range of settings. Advances in data availability coupled with new interaction paradigms, and mobile and cloud computing capabilities, have created a broad range of new opportunities for information access and use. In this comprehensive book for professionals, researchers, and students involved in search system design and evaluation, search expert Ryen White discusses how search systems can capitalize on new capabilities and how next-generation systems must support higher order search activities such as task completion, learning, and decision making. He outlines the implications of these changes for the evolution of search evaluation, as well as challenges that extend beyond search systems in areas such as privacy and societal benefit.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Lewandowski, D.: Wie "Next Generation Search Systems" die Suche auf eine neue Ebene heben und die Informationswelt verändern. In: http://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=254&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045..
  6. Howarth, L.C.: "Is there a catalog in your future?" : Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor (2010) 0.00
    0.0029146418 = product of:
      0.01748785 = sum of:
        0.01748785 = weight(_text_:in in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01748785 = score(doc=3565,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.29450375 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future?: Access to information in the year 2006. In: Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue: Is there a catalog in your future? Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor
  7. Yaroshenko, T.; Bankovska, I.: Libraries and catalogs in Ukraine : the way to understand the past and build the future (2015) 0.00
    0.0027546515 = product of:
      0.016527908 = sum of:
        0.016527908 = weight(_text_:in in 1880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016527908 = score(doc=1880,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.27833787 = fieldWeight in 1880, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1880)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the current state of Library Science and library catalogs in Ukraine. It describes conditions that have impacted their development and problems that influence their growth. Particular focus is given to the increase in information access in Ukrainian libraries that has taken place over the last twenty years. The authors describe major projects in the library field and in the field of library cataloging with special attention to the experience of the Library of the National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy."
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Reshaping the Library Catalog: Selected Papers from the International Conference FSR2014 (Rome, February 27-28, 2014).
  8. Wynne, S.C.; Hanscom, M.J.: ¬The effect of next-generation catalogs on catalogers and cataloging functions in academic libraries (2011) 0.00
    0.0025503114 = product of:
      0.015301868 = sum of:
        0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 1889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015301868 = score(doc=1889,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1889, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1889)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Next-generation catalogs or discovery tools (NGCs) overlay existing bibliographic data and repackage it in displays that differ from the traditional catalog. Many implementations of NGCs have revealed errors, omissions, or inconsistencies in the underlying data that had not been apparent in the traditional catalog. This study explored the effect of NGCs on cataloging functions and catalogers in academic libraries, examining catalogers' participation in the selection and implementation processes, identifying and correcting data problems, changes to procedures or workflow, and staffing.
  9. Biagetti, M.T.; Iacono, A.; Trombone, A.: Testing library catalog analysis as a bibliometric indicator for research evaluation in social sciences and humanities (2018) 0.00
    0.0023797948 = product of:
      0.014278769 = sum of:
        0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014278769 = score(doc=4868,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  10. Clarke, R.I.: Breaking records : the history of bibliographic records and their influence in conceptualizing bibliographic data (2015) 0.00
    0.0020823204 = product of:
      0.012493922 = sum of:
        0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012493922 = score(doc=1877,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A bibliographic record is a conceptual whole that includes all bibliographic information about a resource together in one place. With the Semantic Web, individual data statements are linked across the web. This position article argues that the traditional conceptualization of bibliographic records affects the affordances and limitations of that data. A historical analysis of the development of bibliographic records contrasted with the Semantic Web model reveals how the "record" model shaped library cataloging and the implications on library catalogs today. Reification of the record model for bibliographic data hampers possibilities for innovation in cataloging, inspiring a reconceptualization of bibliographic description.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Reshaping the Library Catalog: Selected Papers from the International Conference FSR2014 (Rome, February 27-28, 2014).
  11. Borie, J.; MacDonald, K.; Sze, E.: Asserting catalogers' place in the "Value of Libraries" conversation (2015) 0.00
    0.0020823204 = product of:
      0.012493922 = sum of:
        0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012493922 = score(doc=1882,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1882, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1882)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have a unique challenge to overcome in demonstrating the value of their services: the better they are at performing their work--making collections accessible and enabling user discovery--the more invisible their efforts are to users and administrators. Catalogers must participate more actively in the broader discussion and demonstration of library value undertaken by their colleagues, but to do so requires a framework and a common vocabulary shared by non-catalogers.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Reshaping the Library Catalog: Selected Papers from the International Conference FSR2014 (Rome, February 27-28, 2014).
  12. Seikel, M.: General notes in catalog records versus FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.00
    0.0020823204 = product of:
      0.012493922 = sum of:
        0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012493922 = score(doc=1929,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article analyzes the literature concerning uses of notes in bibliographic records and also certain grammatical conventions used by catalogers to communicate information about the resources they are describing. It shows that these types of data do not aid the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) user tasks in the resource discovery process. It also describes how general notes are addressed in Resource Description Access (RDA), and advocates that cataloging practices involving most general notes and such conventions as bracketing and abbreviations should be discontinued with the widespread use of RDA.
  13. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.00
    0.0020823204 = product of:
      0.012493922 = sum of:
        0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012493922 = score(doc=4536,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
  14. Puglisi, P.: "¬The day has not yet come ..." : book-jackets in library catalogs (2015) 0.00
    0.0019955188 = product of:
      0.011973113 = sum of:
        0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011973113 = score(doc=1883,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 1971 the eminent American scholar G. Thomas Tanselle wrote: "the day has not yet come when one can learn anything of a library's holdings of jackets by consulting its catalogue." Forty-four years later, library catalogs still do not allow that. Book-jackets, whose "original sin" is their being physically separate from the book, are nevertheless essential documents for the history of publishing. This article aims to show the necessity for access to the information about a single book's book-jacket directly from the library catalog; it considers the reasons why catalogers usually "distrust" book-jackets; and it aims to determine whether there is any change in attitude about taking book-jackets into account in cataloging.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Reshaping the Library Catalog: Selected Papers from the International Conference FSR2014 (Rome, February 27-28, 2014).
  15. Bergman, O.; Gradovitch, N.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Beyth-Marom, R.: Folder versus tag preference in personal information management (2013) 0.00
    0.0019676082 = product of:
      0.011805649 = sum of:
        0.011805649 = weight(_text_:in in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011805649 = score(doc=1103,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Users' preferences for folders versus tags was studied in 2 working environments where both options were available to them. In the Gmail study, we informed 75 participants about both folder-labeling and tag-labeling, observed their storage behavior after 1 month, and asked them to estimate the proportions of different retrieval options in their behavior. In the Windows 7 study, we informed 23 participants about tags and asked them to tag all their files for 2 weeks, followed by a period of 5 weeks of free choice between the 2 methods. Their storage and retrieval habits were tested prior to the learning session and, after 7 weeks, using special classification recording software and a retrieval-habits questionnaire. A controlled retrieval task and an in-depth interview were conducted. Results of both studies show a strong preference for folders over tags for both storage and retrieval. In the minority of cases where tags were used for storage, participants typically used a single tag per information item. Moreover, when multiple classification was used for storage, it was only marginally used for retrieval. The controlled retrieval task showed lower success rates and slower retrieval speeds for tag use. Possible reasons for participants' preferences are discussed.
  16. Pirmann, C.: Tags in the catalogue : insights from a usability study of LibraryThing for libraries (2012) 0.00
    0.001821651 = product of:
      0.010929906 = sum of:
        0.010929906 = weight(_text_:in in 5570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929906 = score(doc=5570,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 5570, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5570)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), the standard subject language used in library catalogues, are often criticized for their lack of currency, biased language, and atypical syndetic structure. Conversely, folksonomies (or tags), which rely on the natural language of their users, offer a flexibility often lacking in controlled vocabularies and may offer a means of augmenting more rigid controlled vocabularies such as LCSH. Content analysis studies have demonstrated the potential for folksonomies to be used as a means of enhancing subject access to materials, and libraries are beginning to integrate tagging systems into their catalogues. This study examines the utility of tags as a means of enhancing subject access to materials in library online public access catalogues (OPACs) through usability testing with the LibraryThing for Libraries catalogue enhancements. Findings indicate that while they cannot replace LCSH, tags do show promise for aiding information seeking in OPACs. In the context of information systems design, the study revealed that while folksonomies have the potential to enhance subject access to materials, that potential is severely limited by the current inability of catalogue interfaces to support tag-based searches alongside standard catalogue searches.
  17. Walsh, L.: ¬The faceted catalog as a tool for searching monographic series : usability study of Lens (2012) 0.00
    0.0018033426 = product of:
      0.010820055 = sum of:
        0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010820055 = score(doc=1902,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study explored the functionality of the University of Chicago's faceted catalog, Lens, in respect to monographic series. A user study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of Lens in searching for monographic series and also to determine whether controlled series access in the catalog record improves the search results. The results of the study indicate that while Lens could be considered an adequate tool for searching series that are known to be published under the same title, some changes would make it a better search engine for a series that changes series statements from one volume to another.
  18. Cossham, A.F.: Models of the bibliographic universe (2017) 0.00
    0.0018033426 = product of:
      0.010820055 = sum of:
        0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010820055 = score(doc=3817,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    What kinds of mental models do library catalogue users have of the bibliographic universe in an age of online and electronic information? Using phenomenography and grounded analysis, it identifies participants' understanding, experience, and conceptualisation of the bibliographic universe, and identifies their expectations when using library catalogues. It contrasts participants' mental models with existing LIS models, and explores the nature of the bibliographic universe. The bibliographic universe can be considered to be a social object that exists because it is inscribed in catalogue records, cataloguing codes, bibliographies, and other bibliographic tools. It is a socially constituted phenomenon.
    Content
    A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Monash University in 2017 Faculty of Information Technology. Vgl.: https://figshare.com/articles/Models_of_the_bibliographic_universe/5216347.
  19. González, P.U.: ¬A strategy for integrating printed catalog cards from three Cuban libraries into the open linked data space : on liberty, attention engineering, and learning analytics (2019) 0.00
    0.0018033426 = product of:
      0.010820055 = sum of:
        0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 5515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010820055 = score(doc=5515,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5515, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5515)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article summarizes the main aspects of the strategy created as the result of the project to integrate printed catalogs into Cuban digital library spaces and the internet in general. It also describes the status of the initiative and offers reflections on the relationship between the ongoing parallel development of online catalogs, digital libraries, and digital repositories of cultural patrimony, highlighting opportunities to make use of linked data techniques for these purposes.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Communities and Technologies: Realities, Challenges, and Opportunities for Librarians in Cuba'.
  20. Schultz-Jones, B.; Snow, K.; Miksa, S.; Hasenyager Jr., R.L.: Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues (2012) 0.00
    0.0018033426 = product of:
      0.010820055 = sum of:
        0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010820055 = score(doc=5558,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Discussions of quality in library cataloguing are traced from early library science literature to current debates. Three studies that examine dimensions of quality cataloguing in academic libraries, public libraries, and school libraries and a review of vendor processes update the issues surrounding a definition of bibliographic record quality and quality assurance processes. The implications of perceptions of bibliographic record quality on next-generation catalogues are presented with emphasis on the shift in the cataloguer's judgment from rigid standards for transcription to meeting the requirement for more metadata that matches the user need of find-ability.

Types

  • a 43
  • el 7
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…