Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Electronic Dewey (1993) 0.00
    0.004648002 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = product of:
          0.04648002 = sum of:
            0.04648002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04648002 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.134-137 (M. Carpenter). - Inzwischen existiert auch eine Windows-Version: 'Electronic Dewey for Windows', vgl. Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.17
  2. Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo (2020) 0.00
    0.003034665 = product of:
      0.015173324 = sum of:
        0.015173324 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015173324 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    We are proud to announce DBpedia Archivo (https://archivo.dbpedia.org) an augmented ontology archive and interface to implement FAIRer ontologies. Each ontology is rated with 4 stars measuring basic FAIR features. We discovered 890 ontologies reaching on average 1.95 out of 4 stars. Many of them have no or unclear licenses and have issues w.r.t. retrieval and parsing.