Search (162 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.10
    0.10324493 = product of:
      0.20648986 = sum of:
        0.20648986 = sum of:
          0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0934737 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.113016166 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  2. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.09
    0.093738616 = product of:
      0.18747723 = sum of:
        0.18747723 = sum of:
          0.11684212 = weight(_text_:classification in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11684212 = score(doc=3576,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.0706351 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0706351 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Classification structure and indexes to classifications need to be better understood before classification can be a major access point in online catalogs.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) no.1, S.99-102
  3. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  4. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.07
    0.070444 = product of:
      0.140888 = sum of:
        0.140888 = sum of:
          0.091443434 = weight(_text_:classification in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091443434 = score(doc=2509,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  5. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.06
    0.061301984 = product of:
      0.12260397 = sum of:
        0.12260397 = sum of:
          0.06609589 = weight(_text_:classification in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06609589 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  6. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.06
    0.06038057 = product of:
      0.12076114 = sum of:
        0.12076114 = sum of:
          0.078380086 = weight(_text_:classification in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.078380086 = score(doc=2464,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  7. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.06
    0.060138173 = product of:
      0.12027635 = sum of:
        0.12027635 = sum of:
          0.070831776 = weight(_text_:classification in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070831776 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  8. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.05
    0.053639237 = product of:
      0.10727847 = sum of:
        0.10727847 = sum of:
          0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057833903 = score(doc=2342,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The knowledge structures that form traditional library classification schemes hold great potential for improving resource description and discovery on the Internet and for organizing electronic document collections. The advantages of assigning subject tokens (classes) to documents from a scheme like the DDC system are well documented
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  9. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.05
    0.053639237 = product of:
      0.10727847 = sum of:
        0.10727847 = sum of:
          0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057833903 = score(doc=88,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.05
    0.051622465 = product of:
      0.10324493 = sum of:
        0.10324493 = sum of:
          0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04673685 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  11. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.05
    0.051547006 = product of:
      0.10309401 = sum of:
        0.10309401 = sum of:
          0.060712952 = weight(_text_:classification in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060712952 = score(doc=780,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  12. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.05
    0.051547006 = product of:
      0.10309401 = sum of:
        0.10309401 = sum of:
          0.060712952 = weight(_text_:classification in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060712952 = score(doc=3697,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  13. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.05
    0.04597649 = product of:
      0.09195298 = sum of:
        0.09195298 = sum of:
          0.049571916 = weight(_text_:classification in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049571916 = score(doc=769,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.05
    0.04516966 = product of:
      0.09033932 = sum of:
        0.09033932 = sum of:
          0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040894743 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
  15. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.04
    0.03871685 = product of:
      0.0774337 = sum of:
        0.0774337 = sum of:
          0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03505264 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Exploring collections by their subject matter is an important functionality for library users. We developed an online tool called SciGator in order to allow users to browse the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) classes used in different libraries at the University of Pavia and to perform different types of search in the OPAC. Besides navigation of DDC hierarchies, SciGator suggests "see-also" relationships with related classes and maps equivalent classes in local shelving schemes, thus allowing the expansion of search queries to include subjects contiguous to the initial one. We are developing new features, including the possibility to expand searches even more to national and international catalogues.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  16. Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996) 0.03
    0.033908132 = product of:
      0.067816265 = sum of:
        0.067816265 = product of:
          0.13563253 = sum of:
            0.13563253 = weight(_text_:classification in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13563253 = score(doc=5578,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.177-203
  17. Dhyani, P.: Library classification in computer age (1999) 0.03
    0.030913522 = product of:
      0.061827045 = sum of:
        0.061827045 = product of:
          0.12365409 = sum of:
            0.12365409 = weight(_text_:classification in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12365409 = score(doc=3153,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.7447551 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Library classification is constantly being influenced by multifaceted, multidimensional, and infinite growth of literature on one hand and the users needs on the other. Dewey pioneered in devising a scheme of classification for the documentation utility of the organised knowledge. Subsequent schemes of classification worked purely without any theoretical foundation, colon classification being the exception. With the emergence of computer technology the library classification is being metamorphised. This paper attempts to delve a state-of-the-art of library classification in the new computer age.
  18. Cochrane, P.A.: Classification as a user's tool in online public access catalogs (1982) 0.03
    0.030356476 = product of:
      0.060712952 = sum of:
        0.060712952 = product of:
          0.121425904 = sum of:
            0.121425904 = weight(_text_:classification in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121425904 = score(doc=11,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.731335 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6. - 2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  19. Borko, H.: ¬The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries (1982) 0.03
    0.030356476 = product of:
      0.060712952 = sum of:
        0.060712952 = product of:
          0.121425904 = sum of:
            0.121425904 = weight(_text_:classification in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121425904 = score(doc=37,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.731335 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  20. Travis, I.: Faceted classification in an online environment (1982) 0.03
    0.030356476 = product of:
      0.060712952 = sum of:
        0.060712952 = product of:
          0.121425904 = sum of:
            0.121425904 = weight(_text_:classification in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121425904 = score(doc=40,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.731335 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg

Years