Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.00
    0.0020392092 = product of:
      0.0040784185 = sum of:
        0.0040784185 = product of:
          0.008156837 = sum of:
            0.008156837 = weight(_text_:a in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008156837 = score(doc=3102,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification has been used to organize materials owned by the three scientific libraries at the University of Pavia, and to allow integrated browsing in their union catalogue through SciGator, a home built web-based user interface. Classification acts as a bridge between collections located in different places and shelved according to different local schemes. Furthermore, cross-discipline relationships recorded in the system allow for expanded queries that increase recall. Advantages and possible improvements of such a system are discussed.
    Type
    a
  2. Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010) 0.00
    0.0018428253 = product of:
      0.0036856506 = sum of:
        0.0036856506 = product of:
          0.0073713013 = sum of:
            0.0073713013 = weight(_text_:a in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0073713013 = score(doc=4396,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted browsing is a common feature of new library catalog interfaces. But to what extent does it improve user performance in searching within today's library catalog systems? This article reviews the literature for user studies involving faceted browsing and user studies of "next-generation" library catalogs that incorporate faceted browsing. Both the results and the methods of these studies are analyzed by asking, What do we currently know about faceted browsing? How can we design better studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs? The article proposes methodological considerations for practicing librarians and provides examples of goals, tasks, and measurements for user studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs.
    Type
    a