Search (79 results, page 4 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. MacLennan, A.: Classification and the Internet (2000) 0.00 
    0.002995795 = product of:
  0.04194113 = sum of:
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=3150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Satyapal, B.G.; Satyapal, N.S.: SATSAN AUTOMATRIX Version 1 : a computer programme for synthesis of Colon class number according to the postulational approach (2006) 0.00 
    0.0028605436 = product of:
  0.020023804 = sum of:
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
    0.014978974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014978974 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001) 0.00 
    0.0025944347 = product of:
  0.036322083 = sum of:
    0.036322083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036322083 = score(doc=6113,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Svensson, L.G.: Integrating browsing over DDC notations in library portals (2007) 0.00 
    0.0025678244 = product of:
  0.03594954 = sum of:
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Facets and controlled vocabularies : an annotated bibliography (2003) 0.00 
    0.002420968 = product of:
  0.033893548 = sum of:
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=2900,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: All about facets and controlled vocabularies (2002) 0.00 
    0.002420968 = product of:
  0.033893548 = sum of:
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=5141,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: What is a controlled vocabulary? (2002) 0.00 
    0.002420968 = product of:
  0.033893548 = sum of:
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=2417,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  8. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Creating a controlled vocabulary (2003) 0.00 
    0.002420968 = product of:
  0.033893548 = sum of:
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=2461,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  9. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Synonym rings and authority files (2003) 0.00 
    0.002420968 = product of:
  0.033893548 = sum of:
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=2468,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2468, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2468)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  10. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Controlled vocabularies : a glosso-thesaurus (2003) 0.00 
    0.002420968 = product of:
  0.033893548 = sum of:
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=2469,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  11. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003) 0.00 
    0.0021398535 = product of:
  0.029957948 = sum of:
    0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029957948 = score(doc=2703,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Dunsire, G.: Digital decimals : Dewey and online libraries (2008) 0.00 
    0.0017118829 = product of:
  0.023966359 = sum of:
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. Zaytseva, E.: Classification tools for librarians and users : the Russian experience (2008) 0.00 
    0.0017118829 = product of:
  0.023966359 = sum of:
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=2179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  14. Vizine-Goetz, D.: DeweyBrowser (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014978976 = product of:
  0.020970564 = sum of:
    0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020970564 = score(doc=5774,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  15. Panzer, M.: Towards the "webification" of controlled subject vocabulary : a case study involving the Dewey Decimal Classification (2007) 0.00 
    0.0014978976 = product of:
  0.020970564 = sum of:
    0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020970564 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  16. Slavic, A.: Interface to classification : some objectives and options (2006) 0.00 
    0.0012839122 = product of:
  0.01797477 = sum of:
    0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01797477 = score(doc=2131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2131)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  17. Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.: Building a faceted classification for the humanities : principles and procedures (2007) 0.00 
    0.001210484 = product of:
  0.016946774 = sum of:
    0.016946774 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016946774 = score(doc=2875,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview of principles and procedures involved in creating a faceted classification scheme for use in resource discovery in an online environment. Design/methodology/approach - Facet analysis provides an established rigorous methodology for the conceptual organization of a subject field, and the structuring of an associated classification or controlled vocabulary. This paper explains how that methodology was applied to the humanities in the FATKS project, where the objective was to explore the potential of facet analytical theory for creating a controlled vocabulary for the humanities, and to establish the requirements of a faceted classification appropriate to an online environment. A detailed faceted vocabulary was developed for two areas of the humanities within a broader facet framework for the whole of knowledge. Research issues included how to create a data model which made the faceted structure explicit and machine-readable and provided for its further development and use. Findings - In order to support easy facet combination in indexing, and facet searching and browsing on the interface, faceted classification requires a formalized data structure and an appropriate tool for its management. The conceptual framework of a faceted system proper can be applied satisfactorily to humanities, and fully integrated within a vocabulary management system. Research limitations/implications - The procedures described in this paper are concerned only with the structuring of the classification, and do not extend to indexing, retrieval and application issues. Practical implications - Many stakeholders in the domain of resource discovery consider developing their own classification system and supporting tools. The methods described in this paper may clarify the process of building a faceted classification and may provide some useful ideas with respect to the vocabulary maintenance tool. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware there is no comparable research in this area.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  18. Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003) 0.00 
    0.0011119007 = product of:
  0.015566608 = sum of:
    0.015566608 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015566608 = score(doc=1202,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.17366013 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    The concept of c-space is proposed as a visualization schema relating containers of content to cataloging surrogates and classification structures. Possible applications of keyword vector clusters within c-space could include improved retrieval rates through the use of captioning within visual hierarchies, tracings of semantic bleeding among subclasses, and access to buried knowledge within subject-neutral publication containers. The Scholastica Project is described as one example, following a tradition of research dating back to the 1980's. Preliminary focus group assessment indicates that this type of classification rendering may offer digital library searchers enriched entry strategies and an expanded range of re-entry vocabularies. Those of us who work in traditional libraries typically assume that our systems of classification: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), are descriptive rather than prescriptive. In other words, LCC classes and subclasses approximate natural groupings of texts that reflect an underlying order of knowledge, rather than arbitrary categories prescribed by librarians to facilitate efficient shelving. Philosophical support for this assumption has traditionally been found in a number of places, from the archetypal tree of knowledge, to Aristotelian categories, to the concept of discursive formations proposed by Michel Foucault. Gary P. Radford has elegantly described an encounter with Foucault's discursive formations in the traditional library setting: "Just by looking at the titles on the spines, you can see how the books cluster together...You can identify those books that seem to form the heart of the discursive formation and those books that reside on the margins. Moving along the shelves, you see those books that tend to bleed over into other classifications and that straddle multiple discursive formations. You can physically and sensually experience...those points that feel like state borders or national boundaries, those points where one subject ends and another begins, or those magical places where one subject has morphed into another..."
    But what happens to this awareness in a digital library? Can discursive formations be represented in cyberspace, perhaps through diagrams in a visualization interface? And would such a schema be helpful to a digital library user? To approach this question, it is worth taking a moment to reconsider what Radford is looking at. First, he looks at titles to see how the books cluster. To illustrate, I scanned one hundred books on the shelves of a college library under subclass HT 101-395, defined by the LCC subclass caption as Urban groups. The City. Urban sociology. Of the first 100 titles in this sequence, fifty included the word "urban" or variants (e.g. "urbanization"). Another thirty-five used the word "city" or variants. These keywords appear to mark their titles as the heart of this discursive formation. The scattering of titles not using "urban" or "city" used related terms such as "town," "community," or in one case "skyscrapers." So we immediately see some empirical correlation between keywords and classification. But we also see a problem with the commonly used search technique of title-keyword. A student interested in urban studies will want to know about this entire subclass, and may wish to browse every title available therein. A title-keyword search on "urban" will retrieve only half of the titles, while a search on "city" will retrieve just over a third. There will be no overlap, since no titles in this sample contain both words. The only place where both words appear in a common string is in the LCC subclass caption, but captions are not typically indexed in library Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). In a traditional library, this problem is mitigated when the student goes to the shelf looking for any one of the books and suddenly discovers a much wider selection than the keyword search had led him to expect. But in a digital library, the issue of non-retrieval can be more problematic, as studies have indicated. Micco and Popp reported that, in a study funded partly by the U.S. Department of Education, 65 of 73 unskilled users searching for material on U.S./Soviet foreign relations found some material but never realized they had missed a large percentage of what was in the database.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  19. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.00 
    0.0010699268 = product of:
  0.014978974 = sum of:
    0.014978974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014978974 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

Authors

Types

  • a 56
  • el 20
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications