Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998) 0.01
    0.0142422225 = product of:
      0.05696889 = sum of:
        0.05696889 = weight(_text_:social in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05696889 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Comparison between grounded theory (a qualitative social science research methodology of Glaser and Strauss) and facet classification (Ranganathan)
  2. Svenonius, E.: Ranganathan and classification science (1992) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses some of Ranganathan's contributions to the productive, practical and theoretical aspects of classification science. These include: (1) a set of design criteria to guide the designing of schemes for knowledge / subject classification; (2) a conceptual framework for organizing the universe of subjects; and (3) an understanding of the general principles underlying subject disciplines and classificatory languages. It concludes that Ranganathan has contributed significantly to laying the foundations for a science of subject classification.
  3. Kumar, K.: Distinctive contribution of Ranganathan to library classification (1992) 0.01
    0.009149151 = product of:
      0.036596604 = sum of:
        0.036596604 = product of:
          0.07319321 = sum of:
            0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 6991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07319321 = score(doc=6991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 6991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6991)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Stresses that S.R. Ranganathan was truly a great scholar, who made rich contribution to different aspects of library and information science, but is better known for his work in the field of library classification. discusses his distinctive contributions to classification such as normative principles, 3 plane model of work, freely faceted classification (involving facet analysis and the synthetic principle), postulational approach, fundamental categories and certain notational devices like the sector device, group notation device, emptying digit device and seminal mnemonic device. Regards these as seminal ideas forming the basis of his theory of library classification. Considers 7th ed. of the Colon Classification as the best example of the application of theses ideas
  4. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  5. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.005491857 = product of:
      0.021967428 = sum of:
        0.021967428 = product of:
          0.043934856 = sum of:
            0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043934856 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  6. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.00
    0.004707306 = product of:
      0.018829225 = sum of:
        0.018829225 = product of:
          0.03765845 = sum of:
            0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03765845 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  7. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.00
    0.0039227554 = product of:
      0.015691021 = sum of:
        0.015691021 = product of:
          0.031382043 = sum of:
            0.031382043 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031382043 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22