-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.01
0.010432388 = product of:
0.062594324 = sum of:
0.0031348949 = weight(_text_:in in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031348949 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.031631682 = weight(_text_:der in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031631682 = score(doc=3494,freq=28.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.6464053 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.027827747 = product of:
0.04174162 = sum of:
0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020965107 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020776514 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.13
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004)
0.00
0.0029579736 = product of:
0.017747842 = sum of:
0.0067176316 = weight(_text_:in in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067176316 = score(doc=2650,freq=18.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.0060385168 = weight(_text_:der in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060385168 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.0049916925 = product of:
0.0149750775 = sum of:
0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149750775 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at the problems raised by maintaining an Area Table in a general scheme of classification. It examines the tools available to assist in producing a standardized listing and demonstrates how recent developments in the Universal Decimal Classification enable users to have a retrieval tool suitable for use in a networked environment which acts as both a gazetteer and a classification.
- Content
- 1. Introduction The representation of place in classification schemes presents a number of problems. This paper examines some of them and presents different ways in which a solution may be sought. Firstly, what is meant by place? The simple answer is a geographical area, large or small. The reality is not so simple. Place, or Topos to Aristotle was more than just an area, it was a state of mind. But even staying an the less philosophical plane, the way in which a place can be expressed is infinitely variable. Toponymy is a well defined field of study, comparable with taxonomy in the biological sciences. It comprehends the proper name by which any geographical entity is known, and part of the world, feature of earth's surface, organic aggregate (reef, forest) an organizational unit (country, borough, diocese), limits of Earth (poles, hemispheres) parts of Earth (oceans, continents), lakes, mountain passes, capital cities or sea parts.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:17:11
- Footnote
- Ein Beitrag zur Problematik der Gestaltung geographischer Schlüssel zu Klassifikationssystemen
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.00
0.0029122676 = product of:
0.026210409 = sum of:
0.0063334443 = weight(_text_:in in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0063334443 = score(doc=2282,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.019876964 = product of:
0.029815445 = sum of:
0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149750775 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.014840367 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014840367 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The structure of a classification system contributes in a variety of ways to representing semantic relationships between its topics in the context of subject authority control. We explore this claim using the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as a case study. The DDC links its classes into a notational hierarchy, supplemented by a network of relationships between topics, expressed in class descriptions and in the Relative Index (RI). Topics/subjects are expressed both by the natural language text of the caption and notes (including Manual notes) in a class description and by the controlled vocabulary of the RI's alphabetic index, which shows where topics are treated in the classificatory structure. The expression of relationships between topics depends on paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships between natural language terms in captions, notes, and RI terms; on the meaning of specific note types; and on references recorded between RI terms. The specific means used in the DDC for capturing hierarchical (including disciplinary), equivalence and associative relationships are surveyed.
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Kaula, P.N.: Canons in analytico-synthetic classification (1979)
0.00
0.0025451102 = product of:
0.02290599 = sum of:
0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582737 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.019323254 = weight(_text_:der in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019323254 = score(doc=1428,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017)
0.00
0.0024847728 = product of:
0.014908636 = sum of:
0.003878427 = weight(_text_:in in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003878427 = score(doc=3849,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.0060385168 = weight(_text_:der in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060385168 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.0049916925 = product of:
0.0149750775 = sum of:
0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149750775 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:58:02
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979)
0.00
0.0024001906 = product of:
0.021601714 = sum of:
0.007109274 = weight(_text_:in in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007109274 = score(doc=1427,freq=14.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.01449244 = weight(_text_:der in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01449244 = score(doc=1427,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.00
0.0019162666 = product of:
0.0172464 = sum of:
0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053741056 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.011872293 = product of:
0.03561688 = sum of:
0.03561688 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561688 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.2, S.129-134.
-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.00
0.0016938191 = product of:
0.015244371 = sum of:
0.009308225 = weight(_text_:in in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009308225 = score(doc=1428,freq=24.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.0059361467 = product of:
0.01780844 = sum of:
0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01780844 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.00
0.001675593 = product of:
0.0150803365 = sum of:
0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165474 = score(doc=7242,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.007914863 = product of:
0.023744587 = sum of:
0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744587 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Loehrlein, A.J.; Lemieux, V.L.; Bennett, M.: ¬The classification of financial products (2014)
0.00
0.0016088464 = product of:
0.014479617 = sum of:
0.006008433 = weight(_text_:in in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006008433 = score(doc=1196,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.0084711835 = product of:
0.02541355 = sum of:
0.02541355 = weight(_text_:29 in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02541355 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- In the wake of the global financial crisis, the U.S. Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) was enacted to provide increased transparency in financial markets. In response to Dodd-Frank, a series of rules relating to swaps record keeping have been issued, and one such rule calls for the creation of a financial products classification system. The manner in which financial products are classified will have a profound effect on data integration and analysis in the financial industry. This article considers various approaches that can be taken when classifying financial products and recommends the use of facet analysis. The article argues that this type of analysis is flexible enough to accommodate multiple viewpoints and rigorous enough to facilitate inferences that are based on the hierarchical structure. Various use cases are examined that pertain to the organization of financial products. The use cases confirm the practical utility of taxonomies that are designed according to faceted principles.
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:29:52
-
Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004)
0.00
0.0015553564 = product of:
0.013998208 = sum of:
0.0070098387 = weight(_text_:in in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070098387 = score(doc=2640,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.006988369 = product of:
0.020965107 = sum of:
0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020965107 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The classification of documents about topics relating to people of mixed race is problematic, partly because of the obscurity of racial categorization in general, and partly because of the limitations and inherent biases of bibliographic classification schemes designed primarily for usage in non-digital environments. Critical race theory is an approach that may prove useful in deterrnining how classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification should most appropriately be stuctured.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:38:42
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
-
Kleineberg, M.: Integrative levels (2017)
0.00
0.0015553564 = product of:
0.013998208 = sum of:
0.0070098387 = weight(_text_:in in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070098387 = score(doc=3840,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
0.006988369 = product of:
0.020965107 = sum of:
0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020965107 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- This article provides a historical overview and conceptual clarification of the idea of integrative levels as an organizing principle. It will be demonstrated that this concept has found different articulations (e.g., levels of integration, levels of organization, levels of complexity, levels of granularity, nested hierarchy, specification hierarchy, hierarchical integration, progressive integration, holarchy, superformation, self-organization cycles) and widespread applications based on various, often unrelated theoretical and disciplinary backgrounds. In order to determine its role in the field of knowledge organization, some common misconceptions and major criticisms will be reconsidered in light of a broader multidisciplinary context. In particular, it will be shown how this organizing principle has been fruitfully applied to human-related research areas such as psychology, social sciences, or humanities in terms of integrative levels of knowing.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:49:44
-
Olson, H.A.: Cultural discourse of classification : indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Durkheim, and Foucault (2001)
0.00
0.0015426357 = product of:
0.013883721 = sum of:
0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005429798 = score(doc=1594,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.008453923 = weight(_text_:der in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008453923 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The paper explores the cultural construction of classification by identifying fundamental characteristics of classification and examining how these fit with other cultures. Foucault's method of discourse analysis is applied to selected texts an classification in two areas. The first area is classification originated in the dominant Western culture. The second area is classifications from indigenous cultures. It is concluded that classification research needs to have an increasing awareness of the cultural construction of classification schemes and to work with alternatives to approaches of fundamental universal principles of classification.
- Source
- Advances in classification research, vol.10: proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Ed.: Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003)
0.00
0.0015100182 = product of:
0.0135901645 = sum of:
0.007600134 = weight(_text_:in in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007600134 = score(doc=2632,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.005990031 = product of:
0.017970093 = sum of:
0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017970093 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the need for knowledge organization (KO) tools, such as library classifications, thesauri and subject heading systems, to be fully disclosed and available in the open network environment. The authors look at the place and value of traditional library knowledge organization tools in relation to the technical environment and expectations of the Semantic Web. Future requirements in this context are explored, stressing the need for KO systems to support semantic interoperability. In order to be fully shareable KO tools need to be reframed and reshaped in terms of conceptual and data models. The authors suggest that some useful approaches to this already exist in methodological and technical developments within the fields of ontology modelling and lexicographic and terminological data interchange.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:26:23
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.8
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004)
0.00
0.0015100182 = product of:
0.0135901645 = sum of:
0.007600134 = weight(_text_:in in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007600134 = score(doc=2663,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.005990031 = product of:
0.017970093 = sum of:
0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017970093 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 17:33:13
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
-
Gnoli, C.: Phylogenetic classification (2006)
0.00
0.0015100182 = product of:
0.0135901645 = sum of:
0.007600134 = weight(_text_:in in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007600134 = score(doc=164,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.005990031 = product of:
0.017970093 = sum of:
0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017970093 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- One general principle in the construction of classification schemes is that of grouping phenomena to be classified according to their shared origin in evolution or history (phylogenesis). In general schemes, this idea has been applied by several classificationists in identifying a series of integrative levels, each originated from the previous ones, and using them as the main classes. In special schemes, common origin is a key principle in many domains: examples are given from the classification of climates, of organisms, and of musical instruments. Experience from these domains, however, suggests that using common origin alone, as done in cladistic taxonomy, can produce weird results, like having birds as a subclass of reptiles; while the most satisfying classifications use a well balanced mix of common origin and similarity. It is discussed how this could be applied to the development of a general classification of phenomena in an emergentist perspective, and how the resulting classification tree could be structured. Charles Bennett's notion of logical depth appears to be a promising conceptual tool for this purpose.
- Date
- 11. 3.2007 14:19:29
-
Zhonghong, W.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.: Potential and prospects of taxonomies for content organization (2006)
0.00
0.0014731288 = product of:
0.013258159 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=169,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
0.006988369 = product of:
0.020965107 = sum of:
0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020965107 = score(doc=169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- While taxonomies are being increasingly discussed in published and grey literature, the term taxonomy still seems to be stated quite loosely and obscurely. This paper aims at explaining and clarifying the concept of taxonomy in the context of information organization. To this end, the salient features of taxonomies are identified and their scope, nature, and role are further elaborated based on an extensive literature review. In the meantime, the connection and distinctions between taxonomies and classification schemes and thesauri are also identified, and the rationale that taxonomies are chosen as a viable knowledge organization system used in organization-wide websites to support browsing and aid navigation is clarified.
- Date
- 11. 3.2007 14:20:29
-
Olson, H.A.: ¬The ubiquitous hierarchy : an army to overcome the threat of a mob (2004)
0.00
0.0014715961 = product of:
0.013244364 = sum of:
0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582737 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.009661627 = weight(_text_:der in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009661627 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Poli, R.: Framing information (2003)
0.00
0.0014503849 = product of:
0.013053464 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=2711,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.007986708 = product of:
0.023960123 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 15:29:04
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.8
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016)
0.00
0.0014503849 = product of:
0.013053464 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=4889,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.007986708 = product of:
0.023960123 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.15
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
