-
Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992)
1.10
1.0973651 = product of:
1.5363111 = sum of:
0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067897044 = score(doc=821,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.089272216 = weight(_text_:classification in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089272216 = score(doc=821,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.93359995 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.053737402 = product of:
0.107474804 = sum of:
0.107474804 = weight(_text_:schemes in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107474804 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.66890633 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1796588 = product of:
0.3593176 = sum of:
0.3593176 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3593176 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.23108649 = weight(_text_:henry in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23108649 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23560001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9808425 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.30325162 = weight(_text_:evelyn in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30325162 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26989174 = queryWeight, product of:
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.1236047 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.3593176 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3593176 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21478812 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.106416434 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106416434 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9104023 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.089272216 = weight(_text_:classification in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089272216 = score(doc=821,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.93359995 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.056401204 = product of:
0.11280241 = sum of:
0.11280241 = weight(_text_:texts in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11280241 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6852849 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.71428573 = coord(10/14)
- COMPASS
- Documents / Subject classification
- LCSH
- Classification, Bibliographic
Bliss Bibliographic classification
- PRECIS
- Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
- Subject
- Classification, Bibliographic
Bliss Bibliographic classification
Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
Documents / Subject classification
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.10
0.10096708 = product of:
0.2827078 = sum of:
0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048010457 = score(doc=7242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.071214594 = weight(_text_:classification in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071214594 = score(doc=7242,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7447551 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.07599616 = product of:
0.15199232 = sum of:
0.15199232 = weight(_text_:schemes in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15199232 = score(doc=7242,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9459764 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071214594 = weight(_text_:classification in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071214594 = score(doc=7242,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7447551 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
- Object
- NLM Classification
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1996) no.2, S.89-104
-
Hurt, C.D.: Classification and subject analysis : looking to the future at a distance (1997)
0.06
0.062728494 = product of:
0.21954973 = sum of:
0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 6929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948522 = score(doc=6929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 6929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6929)
0.0659319 = weight(_text_:classification in 6929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0659319 = score(doc=6929,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 6929, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6929)
0.053737402 = product of:
0.107474804 = sum of:
0.107474804 = weight(_text_:schemes in 6929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107474804 = score(doc=6929,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.66890633 = fieldWeight in 6929, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0659319 = weight(_text_:classification in 6929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0659319 = score(doc=6929,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 6929, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6929)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Classic classification schemes are uni-dimensional, with few exceptions. One of the challenges of distance education and new learning strategies is that the proliferation of course work defies the traditional categorization. The rigidity of most present classification schemes does not mesh well with the burgeoning fluidity of the academic environment. One solution is a return to a largely forgotten area of study - classification theory. Some suggestions for exploration are nonmonotonic logic systems, neural network models, and non-library models.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and classification: trends, transformations, teaching, and training."
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.97-112
-
Kochar, R.S.: Library classification systems (1998)
0.06
0.06054551 = product of:
0.21190928 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
0.074478 = weight(_text_:classification in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074478 = score(doc=931,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
0.03324832 = product of:
0.06649664 = sum of:
0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649664 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.074478 = weight(_text_:classification in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074478 = score(doc=931,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Library classification traces the origins of the subject and leads an to the latest developments in it. This user-friendly text explains concepts through analogies, diagrams, and tables. The fundamental but important topics an terminology of classification has been uniquely explained. The book deals with the recent trends in the use of computers in cataloguing including on-line systems, artificial intelligence systems etc. With its up-to-date and comprehensive coverage the book will serve as a degree students of Library and Information Science and also prove to be invaluable reference material to professionals and researchers.
- Content
- Contents: Preface. 1. Classification systems. 2. Automatic classification. 3. Knowledge classification. 4. Reflections on library classification. 5. General classification schemes. 6. Hierarchical classification. 7. Faceted classification. B. Present methods and future directions. Index.
-
Svenonius, E.: Ranganathan and classification science (1992)
0.06
0.058418572 = product of:
0.20446499 = sum of:
0.058800567 = weight(_text_:subject in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058800567 = score(doc=2654,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.03799808 = product of:
0.07599616 = sum of:
0.07599616 = weight(_text_:schemes in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07599616 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- This article discusses some of Ranganathan's contributions to the productive, practical and theoretical aspects of classification science. These include: (1) a set of design criteria to guide the designing of schemes for knowledge / subject classification; (2) a conceptual framework for organizing the universe of subjects; and (3) an understanding of the general principles underlying subject disciplines and classificatory languages. It concludes that Ranganathan has contributed significantly to laying the foundations for a science of subject classification.
-
Pocock, H.: Classification schemes : development and survival (1997)
0.05
0.04646811 = product of:
0.21685117 = sum of:
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=762,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.08226826 = product of:
0.16453652 = sum of:
0.16453652 = weight(_text_:schemes in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16453652 = score(doc=762,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.0240495 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06729146 = weight(_text_:classification in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06729146 = score(doc=762,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the development of classification schemes and their ability to adapt to and accomodate changes in the information world in order to survive. Examines the revision plans for the major classification schemes and the future use of classification search facilities for OPACs
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.04
0.042900864 = product of:
0.15015301 = sum of:
0.05319857 = weight(_text_:classification in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05319857 = score(doc=5562,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55634534 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.033585876 = product of:
0.06717175 = sum of:
0.06717175 = weight(_text_:schemes in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06717175 = score(doc=5562,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41806644 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05319857 = weight(_text_:classification in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05319857 = score(doc=5562,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55634534 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.010170003 = product of:
0.020340007 = sum of:
0.020340007 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020340007 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Husain, S.: Library classification : facets and analyses (1993)
0.04
0.040601723 = product of:
0.1894747 = sum of:
0.07811319 = weight(_text_:classification in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07811319 = score(doc=3752,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
0.03324832 = product of:
0.06649664 = sum of:
0.06649664 = weight(_text_:schemes in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06649664 = score(doc=3752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.07811319 = weight(_text_:classification in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07811319 = score(doc=3752,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Kapitel: (1) Definition, need and purpose of classification, (2) History of library classification, (3) Terminology of classification, (4) Development of a theory of classification, (5) Work of classification in three planes and their interrelationship, (6) Work of classification in idea plane, (7) Verbal plane, (8) Notation, definition, need functions, (9) Multidimensional nature of subjects, (10) Growing universe of subjects: problems and solutions, (11) Postulational approach to classification, (12) Formation of sharpening of isolates, (13) Species of classification schemes, (14) DDC, UDC and CC, (15) Designing the depth schedules of classification, (16) Recent trends in classification
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.04
0.039471716 = product of:
0.138151 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=7241,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047104023 = score(doc=7241,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the reasons for the decision, taken at Florida International University Library to develop an in house classification system for their local documents collections. Reviews the structures of existing classification systems, noting their strengths and weaknesses in relation to the development of an in house system and describes the 5 components of the new system; geography, subject categories, extensions for population group and/or function, extensions for type of publication, and title/series designator
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
-
Holman, E.E.: Statistical properties of large published classifications (1992)
0.03
0.028215542 = product of:
0.13167253 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=4250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=4250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=4250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of a survey of 23 published classifications taken from a variety of subject fields
- Source
- Journal of classification. 9(1992) no.2, S.187-210
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The classification of psychology : a case study in the classification of a knowledge field (1998)
0.03
0.026927019 = product of:
0.12565942 = sum of:
0.044909675 = weight(_text_:subject in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044909675 = score(doc=3783,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41819993 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
0.040374875 = weight(_text_:classification in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040374875 = score(doc=3783,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4222364 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
0.040374875 = weight(_text_:classification in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040374875 = score(doc=3783,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4222364 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Different approaches to the classification of a knowledge field include empiristic, rationalistic, historistic, and pragmatic methods. This paper demonstrates how these different methids have been applied to the classification of psychology. An etymological apporach is insufficient to define the subject matter of psychology, because other terms can be used to describe the same domain. To define the subject matter of psychology from the point of view of its formal establishment as a science and academic discipline (in Leipzig, 1879) it is also insufficient because this was done in specific historical circumstances, which narrowed the subject matter to physiologically-related issues. When defining the subject area of a scientific field it is necessary to consider how different ontological and epistemological views have made their influences. A subject area and the approaches by which this subject area has been studied cannot be separated from each other without tracing their mutual historical interactions. The classification of a subject field is theory-laden and thus cannot be neutral or ahistorical. If classification research can claim to have a method that is more general than the study of concrete developments in the single knowledge fields the key is to be found in the general epistemological theories. It is shown how basic epistemological assumptions have formed the different approaches to psychology during the 20th century. The progress in the understanding of basic philosophical questions is decisive both for the development of a knowledge field and as the point of departure of classification. The theoretical principles developed in this paper are applied in a brief analysis of some concrete classification systems, including the one used by PsycINFO / Psychologcal Abstracts. The role of classification in modern information retrieval is also briefly discussed
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.03
0.026421826 = product of:
0.123301856 = sum of:
0.012730695 = weight(_text_:subject in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012730695 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.11854853 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.05528558 = weight(_text_:classification in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05528558 = score(doc=2072,freq=60.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5781711 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
60.0 = termFreq=60.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.05528558 = weight(_text_:classification in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05528558 = score(doc=2072,freq=60.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5781711 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
60.0 = termFreq=60.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.228-229 (B.C. Vickery); Journal of classification 11(1994) no.2, S.255-256 (W. Gödert)
- LCSH
- Classification / Congresses
- Subject
- Classification / Congresses
-
Khanna, J.K.: Analytico-synthetic classification : (a study in CC-7) (1994)
0.03
0.026280444 = product of:
0.12264207 = sum of:
0.029400283 = weight(_text_:subject in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029400283 = score(doc=1471,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2737761 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=1471,freq=24.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=1471,freq=24.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- ANALYTICO-SYNTHETIC CLASSIFICATION- the brain-child of S.R. Ranganathan has brought about an intellectual revolution in the theory and methodology of library classification by generating new ideas. By his vast erudition and deeper research in the Universe of Subjects, Ranganathan applied a postulation approach to classification based on the concept of facet analysis, Phase Analysis, Sector Analysis and Zone Analysis. His enquiry into the concept of fundamental Categories as well as the Analytico-Synthetic quality associated with it, the use of different connecting symbols as in the Meccano apparatus for constructing expressive class numbers for subjects of any depth, the versality of Notation, the analysis of Rounds and Levels, the formation and sharpening of Isolates through various devices, the introduction of the novel concepts of Specals, Systems, Speciators, and Environment Constituents has systematized the whole study of classification into principles, rules and canons. These new methodologies in classification invented as a part of Colon Classification have not only lifted practical classification form mere guess work to scientific methodology but also form an important theme in international conferences. The present work discusses in details the unique methodologies of Ranganathan as used in CC-7. The concepts of Primary Basic Subjects and Non -Primary Basic Subjects have also been discussed at length.
- Content
- Inhalt: 1. Species of Clasification 2. The Making of an Analytico -Synthetic Classification 3. Analytico -Synthetic Classification 4. Basic Subject 5. Primary Basic Subject 6. Non-Primary Basic Subject 7. Notation 8. Fundamental Categories 9. Rounds and Lvels 10. Facet Analyysis and Facet Sequence 11. Phase Realtion 12. Devices in Colon Classification 13. Common Isolates 14. Spece Isolates 15. Lnaguage Isolates 16. Time Isolates 17. Call Number-Class Numbers-Book Number 18. Ranganathan's nfluence on International Classification Thought 19. Alphabetical Index to the Schedule of Basic Subjects
-
Dahlberg, I.: Classification structure principles : Investigations, experiences, conclusions (1998)
0.02
0.024435379 = product of:
0.11403177 = sum of:
0.044100422 = weight(_text_:subject in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044100422 = score(doc=47,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=47,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=47,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- For the purpose of establishing compatibility between the major universal classification systems in use, their structure principles were investigated and crucial points of difficulty for this undertaking were looked for, in order to relate the guiding classes, e.g. of the DDC, UDC, LCC, BC, and CC, to the subject groups of the ICC. With the help of a matrix into whose fields all subject groups of the ICC were inserted, it was not difficult at all to enter the notations of the universal classification systems mentioned. However, differences in terms of level of subdivision were found, as well as differences of occurrences. Most, though not all, of the fields of the ICC matrix could be completely filled with the corresponding notations of the other systems. Through this matrix, a first table of some 81 equivalences was established on which further work regarding the next levels of subject fields can be based
-
Donovan, J.M.: Patron expectations about collocation : measuring the difference between the psychologically real and the really real (1991)
0.02
0.024350438 = product of:
0.113635376 = sum of:
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
0.047020227 = product of:
0.09404045 = sum of:
0.09404045 = weight(_text_:schemes in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09404045 = score(doc=510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.58529305 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033307575 = weight(_text_:classification in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033307575 = score(doc=510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Library patrons have innate expectations about how documents should be arranged. Useful classification schemes are those which conform to these expectations and are thereby psychologically comfortable. All schemes necessarily deviate from these expectations, but not to the same degree. The greater the divergence from this mental standard with a scheme, the greater the psychological discomfort the patron will experience and the less useful the patron will find it. Using as an example the discipline of anthropology, this article develops a measure of the deviation of library classifications from collocation in mental space
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.23-43
-
Beghtol, C.: General classification systems : structural principles for multidisciplinary specification (1998)
0.02
0.02376771 = product of:
0.110915974 = sum of:
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=44,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030166224 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=44,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- In this century, knowledge creation, production, dissemination and use have changed profoundly. Intellectual and physical barriers have been substantially reduced by the rise of multidisciplinarity and by the influence of computerization, particularly by the spread of the World Wide Web (WWW). Bibliographic classification systems need to respond to this situation. Three possible strategic responses are described: 1) adopting an existing system; 2) adapting an existing system; and 3) finding new structural principles for classification systems. Examples of these three responses are given. An extended example of the third option uses the knowledge outline in the Spectrum of Britannica Online to suggest a theory of "viewpoint warrant" that could be used to incorporate differing perspectives into general classification systems
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.021961067 = product of:
0.10248498 = sum of:
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=2464,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.045140486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045140486 = score(doc=2464,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.0122040035 = product of:
0.024408007 = sum of:
0.024408007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024408007 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998)
0.02
0.020441301 = product of:
0.095392734 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=3842,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=3842,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Ranganathan's canons, principles, and postulates can easily confuse readers, especially because he revised and added to them in various editions of his many books. The Classification Research Group, who drew on Ranganathan's work as their basis for classification theory but developed it in their own way, has never clearly organized all their equivalent canons and principles. In this article Spiteri gathers the fundamental rules from both systems and compares and contrasts them. She makes her own clearer set of principles for constructing facets, stating the subject of a document, and designing notation. Spiteri's "simplified model" is clear and understandable, but certainly not simplistic. The model does not include methods for making a faceted system, but will serve as a very useful guide in how to turn initial work into a rigorous classification. Highly recommended
-
Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999)
0.02
0.020441301 = product of:
0.095392734 = sum of:
0.02546139 = weight(_text_:subject in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02546139 = score(doc=726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=726,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
0.03496567 = weight(_text_:classification in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496567 = score(doc=726,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This paper documents the continuing relevance of facet analysis as a technique for searching and organising WWW based materials. The 2 approaches underlying WWW searching and indexing - word and concept based indexing - are outlined. It is argued that facet analysis as an a posteriori approach to classification using words from the subject field as the concept terms in the classification derived represents an excellent approach to searching and organising the results of WWW searches using either search engines or search directories. Finally it is argued that the underlying philosophy of facet analysis is better suited to the disparate nature of WWW resources and searchers than the assumptions of contemporaray IR research.
This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
-
¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval : Memorandum of the Classification Research Group (1997)
0.02
0.018837687 = product of:
0.1318638 = sum of:
0.0659319 = weight(_text_:classification in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0659319 = score(doc=562,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.0659319 = weight(_text_:classification in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0659319 = score(doc=562,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck aus: Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, Dorking. London: Aslib 1957.
- Source
- From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
