Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003) 0.03
    0.029657505 = product of:
      0.11863002 = sum of:
        0.11863002 = weight(_text_:objects in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11863002 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the way in which classification schemes can be applied to the organization of digital resources. The case is argued for the particular suitability of schemes based an faceted principles for the organization of complex digital objects. Details are given of a co-operative project between the School of Library Archive & Information Studies, University College London, and the United Kingdom Higher Education gateways Arts and Humanities Data Service and Humbul, in which a faceted knowledge structure is being developed for the indexing and display of digital materials within a new combined humanities portal.
  2. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.02
    0.02471459 = product of:
      0.09885836 = sum of:
        0.09885836 = weight(_text_:objects in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09885836 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
  3. Howarth, L.C.: Creating pathways to memory : enhancing life histories through category clusters (2008) 0.02
    0.02471459 = product of:
      0.09885836 = sum of:
        0.09885836 = weight(_text_:objects in 2281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09885836 = score(doc=2281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 2281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2281)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    For individuals whose memory and language are intact, making sense of unfamiliar information or objects is a process of matching what is unknown, to what is known through previous learning or experience. The unfamiliar is linked to clusters or categories of the familiar, identifying what is "like" or "nearly like" and excluding all others (De Mey 1982). Most commonly, these are categories on which there is general agreement, sometimes collocated under established terms, labels, or shared naming devices. Classification systems are built on the basis of shared understandings of human knowledge and culture. When memory and/or language are impaired, how does such contextualizing and categorizing occur? Since perception is individual, can a person with cognitive impairment "make sense" of information, an object, a situation, using alternative modes of expression that are less or not language-dependent? This paper reports on preliminary results from a pilot study undertaken as part of exploratory mixed methods research examining the sense-making, sorting, categorization, and recall strategies of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) resulting from early stage dementia.
  4. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.02
    0.015019425 = product of:
      0.0600777 = sum of:
        0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0600777 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.012873792 = product of:
      0.05149517 = sum of:
        0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05149517 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  6. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.01
    0.010728161 = product of:
      0.042912643 = sum of:
        0.042912643 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042912643 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  7. Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003) 0.01
    0.008582529 = product of:
      0.034330115 = sum of:
        0.034330115 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034330115 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    12. 9.2004 17:22:35
  8. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.01
    0.008582529 = product of:
      0.034330115 = sum of:
        0.034330115 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034330115 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04