-
Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004)
0.02
0.017751606 = product of:
0.035503212 = sum of:
0.035503212 = product of:
0.10650963 = sum of:
0.10650963 = weight(_text_:themes in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10650963 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3748681 = queryWeight, product of:
6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
0.058308665 = queryNorm
0.28412563 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The results of a small qualitative study of gay and lesbian information users suggest that facet analysis as it is increasingly practised in the field of information architecture provides a promising avenue for improving information access to gay and lesbian information resources. Findings indicated that gay and lesbian information users have an acute sense of categorization grounded in the need to identify gay-positive physical and social spaces, and in their finely-honed practices of detecting gay "facets" to general information themes. They are also, however, very flexible and adaptable in their application of gay-related facet values, which suggests that browsing systems will have to be designed with considerable care.
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.01
0.013825033 = product of:
0.027650066 = sum of:
0.027650066 = product of:
0.05530013 = sum of:
0.05530013 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05530013 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.204187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058308665 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.011850028 = product of:
0.023700057 = sum of:
0.023700057 = product of:
0.047400113 = sum of:
0.047400113 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047400113 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.204187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058308665 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008)
0.01
0.011094753 = product of:
0.022189505 = sum of:
0.022189505 = product of:
0.066568516 = sum of:
0.066568516 = weight(_text_:themes in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066568516 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3748681 = queryWeight, product of:
6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
0.058308665 = queryNorm
0.17757851 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Several of the papers are clearly written as primers and neatly address the second agenda item: attracting others to the study and use of facet analysis. The most valuable papers are written in clear, approachable language. Vickery's paper (p. 145-160) is a clarion call for faceted classification and facet analysis. The heart of the paper is a primer for central concepts and techniques. Vickery explains the value of using faceted classification in document retrieval. Also provided are potential solutions to thorny interface and display issues with facets. Vickery looks to complementary themes in knowledge organization, such as thesauri and ontologies as potential areas for extending the facet concept. Broughton (p. 193-210) describes a rigorous approach to the application of facet analysis in the creation of a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Classification (BC2). This discussion of exemplary faceted thesauri, recent standards work, and difficulties encountered in the project will provide valuable guidance for future research in this area. Slavic (p. 257-271) provides a challenge to make faceted classification come 'alive' through promoting the use of machine-readable formats for use and exchange in applications such as Topic Maps and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization Systems), and as supported by the standard BS8723 (2005) Structured Vocabulary for Information Retrieval. She also urges designers of faceted classifications to get involved in standards work. Cheti and Paradisi (p. 223-241) outline a basic approach to converting an existing subject indexing tool, the Nuovo Soggetario, into a faceted thesaurus through the use of facet analysis. This discussion, well grounded in the canonical literature, may well serve as a primer for future efforts. Also useful for those who wish to construct faceted thesauri is the article by Tudhope and Binding (p. 211-222). This contains an outline of basic elements to be found in exemplar faceted thesauri, and a discussion of project FACET (Faceted Access to Cultural heritage Terminology) with algorithmically-based semantic query expansion in a dataset composed of items from the National Museum of Science and Industry indexed with AAT (Art and Architecture Thesaurus). This paper looks to the future hybridization of ontologies and facets through standards developments such as SKOS because of the "lightweight semantics" inherent in facets.
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.01
0.009875024 = product of:
0.019750047 = sum of:
0.019750047 = product of:
0.039500095 = sum of:
0.039500095 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039500095 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.204187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058308665 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.19-22
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.01
0.007900019 = product of:
0.015800038 = sum of:
0.015800038 = product of:
0.031600077 = sum of:
0.031600077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031600077 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.204187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058308665 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.01
0.007900019 = product of:
0.015800038 = sum of:
0.015800038 = product of:
0.031600077 = sum of:
0.031600077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031600077 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.204187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058308665 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
