-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.01560256 = product of:
0.03120512 = sum of:
0.03120512 = product of:
0.06241024 = sum of:
0.06241024 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06241024 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004)
0.00
0.0014889077 = product of:
0.0029778155 = sum of:
0.0029778155 = product of:
0.005955631 = sum of:
0.005955631 = weight(_text_:s in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005955631 = score(doc=4644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a method for converting existing thesauri and related resources from their native format to RDF(S) and OWL. The method identifies four steps in the conversion process. In each step, decisions have to be taken with respect to the syntax or semantics of the resulting representation. Each step is supported through a number of guidelines. The method is illustrated through conversions of two large thesauri: MeSH and WordNet.
- Pages
- S.17-31
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.00
0.0012762066 = product of:
0.0025524131 = sum of:
0.0025524131 = product of:
0.0051048263 = sum of:
0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051048263 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.24-34
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Kless, D.; Milton, S.: Comparison of thesauri and ontologies from a semiotic perspective (2010)
0.00
0.0012762066 = product of:
0.0025524131 = sum of:
0.0025524131 = product of:
0.0051048263 = sum of:
0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051048263 = score(doc=756,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.35-44
-
Maculan, B.C.M. dos; Lima, G.A. de; Oliveira, E.D.: Conversion methods from thesaurus to ontologies : a review (2016)
0.00
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = product of:
0.004812876 = sum of:
0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004812876 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.300-307
-
Kless, D.; Milton, S.; Kazmierczak, E.; Lindenthal, J.: Thesaurus and ontology structure : formal and pragmatic differences and similarities (2015)
0.00
0.0010635054 = product of:
0.0021270108 = sum of:
0.0021270108 = product of:
0.0042540217 = sum of:
0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042540217 = score(doc=2036,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1348-1366
-
Fischer, D.H.: From thesauri towards ontologies? (1998)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=2176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.18-30
-
Assem, M. van; Gangemi, A.; Schreiber, G.: Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation (2006)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an overview of the work in progress at the W3C to produce a standard conversion of WordNet to the RDF/OWL representation language in use in the SemanticWeb community. Such a standard representation is useful to provide application developers a high-quality resource and to promote interoperability. Important requirements in this conversion process are that it should be complete and should stay close to WordNet's conceptual model. The paper explains the steps taken to produce the conversion and details design decisions such as the composition of the class hierarchy and properties, the addition of suitable OWL semantics and the chosen format of the URIs. Additional topics include a strategy to incorporate OWL and RDFS semantics in one schema such that both RDF(S) infrastructure and OWL infrastructure can interpret the information correctly, problems encountered in understanding the Prolog source files and the description of the two versions that are provided (Basic and Full) to accommodate different usages of WordNet.
-
Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 30(2005) no.4, S.378-391
-
Rolland-Thomas, P.: Thesaural codes : an appraisal of their use in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (1993)
0.00
8.508044E-4 = product of:
0.0017016088 = sum of:
0.0017016088 = product of:
0.0034032175 = sum of:
0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034032175 = score(doc=549,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- LCSH is known as such since 1975. It always has created headings to serve the LC collections instead of a theoretical basis. It started to replace cross reference codes by thesaural codes in 1986, in a mechanical fashion. It was in no way transformed into a thesaurus. Its encyclopedic coverage, its pre-coordinate concepts make it substantially distinct, considering that thesauri usually map a restricted field of knowledge and use uniterms. The questions raised are whether the new symbols comply with thesaurus standards and if they are true to one or to several models. Explanations and definitions from other lists of subject headings and thesauri, literature in the field of classification and subject indexing will provide some answers. For instance, see refers from a subject heading not used to another or others used. Exceptionally it will lead from a specific term to a more general one. Some equate a see reference with the equivalence relationship. Such relationships are pointed by USE in LCSH. See also references are made from the broader subject to narrower parts of it and also between associated subjects. They suggest lateral or vertical connexions as well as reciprocal relationships. They serve a coordination purpose for some, lay down a methodical search itinerary for others. Since their inception in the 1950's thesauri have been devised for indexing and retrieving information in the fields of science and technology. Eventually they attended to a number of social sciences and humanities. Research derived from thesauri was voluminous. Numerous guidelines are designed. They did not discriminate between the "hard" sciences and the social sciences. RT relationships are widely but diversely used in numerous controlled vocabularies. LCSH's aim is to achieve a list almost free of RT and SA references. It thus restricts relationships to BT/NT, USE and UF. This raises the question as to whether all fields of knowledge can "fit" in the Procrustean bed of RT/NT, i.e., genus/species relationships. Standard codes were devised. It was soon realized that BT/NT, well suited to the genus/species couple could not signal a whole-part relationship. In LCSH, BT and NT function as reciprocals, the whole-part relationship is taken into account by ISO. It is amply elaborated upon by authors. The part-whole connexion is sometimes studied apart. The decision to replace cross reference codes was an improvement. Relations can now be distinguished through the distinct needs of numerous fields of knowledge are not attended to. Topic inclusion, and topic-subtopic, could provide the missing link where genus/species or whole/part are inadequate. Distinct codes, BT/NT and whole/part, should be provided. Sorting relationships with mechanical means can only lead to confusion.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.2, S.71-91
-
Curras, E.: Ontologies, taxonomy and thesauri in information organisation and retrieval (2010)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 200 S
-
Amirhosseini, M.: Quantitative evaluation of the movement from complexity toward simplicity in the structure of thesaurus descriptors (2015)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Malaysian journal of library and information science. 20(2015), no.3, S.47-62
-
Amirhosseini, M.: Theoretical base of quantitative evaluation of unity in a thesaurus term network based on Kant's epistemology (2010)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=5854,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5854, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5854)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.3, S.185-202
-
Amirhosseini, M.; Avidan, G.: ¬A dialectic perspective on the evolution of thesauri and ontologies (2021)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 48(2021) no.6, S.403-429
-
Assem, M. van: Converting and integrating vocabularies for the Semantic Web (2010)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- IV, 186 S
-
Ma, X.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Wu, C.; Meer, F.D. van der; Liu, G.: ¬A SKOS-based multilingual thesaurus of geological time scale for interoperability of online geological maps (2011)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 4800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=4800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4800)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computers & Geosciences. 37(2011), no.10, S.1602-1615
