Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.01 
    0.007579556 = product of:
  0.03789778 = sum of:
    0.03789778 = weight(_text_:r in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03789778 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14802969 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04471847 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  2. Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008) 0.01 
    0.0063569443 = product of:
  0.03178472 = sum of:
    0.03178472 = weight(_text_:u in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03178472 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14642814 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04471847 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  3. Kless, D.; Milton, S.: Comparison of thesauri and ontologies from a semiotic perspective (2010) 0.01 
    0.0063569443 = product of:
  0.03178472 = sum of:
    0.03178472 = weight(_text_:u in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03178472 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14642814 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04471847 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Advances in ontologies: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Ontology Workshop Adelaide, Australia, 7 December 2010. Eds.: K. Taylor, T.Meyer u. M.Orgun [http://krr.meraka.org.za/~aow2010/AOW2010-preproceedings.pdf]
  4. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01 
    0.006058736 = product of:
  0.030293679 = sum of:
    0.030293679 = product of:
      0.060587358 = sum of:
        0.060587358 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060587358 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15659647 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04471847 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  5. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.00 
    0.0038967242 = product of:
  0.01948362 = sum of:
    0.01948362 = product of:
      0.07793448 = sum of:
        0.07793448 = weight(_text_:editors in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07793448 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30020764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04471847 = queryNorm
            0.25960192 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."

Authors

Years

Types

Themes