Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014641746 = product of:
  0.043925237 = sum of:
    0.043925237 = product of:
      0.06588785 = sum of:
        0.023671897 = weight(_text_:science in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023671897 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
        0.04221596 = weight(_text_:29 in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04221596 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

Series

Lecture notes in computer science; no.3298

0.006640667 = product of:
  0.019922001 = sum of:
    0.019922001 = product of:
      0.059766002 = sum of:
        0.059766002 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059766002 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

26.12.2011 13:22:07

0.0053607575 = product of:
  0.016082272 = sum of:
    0.016082272 = product of:
      0.048246812 = sum of:
        0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048246812 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

0.004200951 = product of:
  0.012602853 = sum of:
    0.012602853 = product of:
      0.037808556 = sum of:
        0.037808556 = weight(_text_:science in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037808556 = score(doc=3276,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.32538348 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The originality of this book, which deals with such a new subject matter, lies in the application of methods and concepts never used before - such as Ontologies and Taxonomies, as well as Thesauri - to the ordering of knowledge based on primary information. Chapters in the book also examine the study of Ontologies, Taxonomies and Thesauri from the perspective of Systematics and General Systems Theory. "Ontologies, Taxonomy and Thesauri in Information Organisation and Retrieval" will be extremely useful to those operating within the network of related fields, which includes Documentation and Information Science.

Content

Inhalt: 1. From classifications to ontologies Knowledge - A new concept of knowledge - Knowledge and information - Knowledge organisation - Knowledge organisation and representation - Cognitive sciences - Talent management - Learning systematisation - Historical evolution - From classification to knowledge organisation - Why ontologies exist - Ontologies - The structure of ontologies 2. Taxonomies and thesauri From ordering to taxonomy - The origins of taxonomy - Hierarchical and horizontal order - Correlation with classifications - Taxonomy in computer science - Computing taxonomy - Definitions - Virtual taxonomy, cybernetic taxonomy - Taxonomy in Information Science - Similarities between taxonomies and thesauri - ifferences between taxonomies and thesauri 3. Thesauri Terminology in classification systems - Terminological languages - Thesauri - Thesauri definitions - Conditions that a thesaurus must fulfil - Historical evolution - Classes of thesauri 4. Thesauri in (cladist) systematics Systematics - Systematics as a noun - Definitions and historic evolution over time - Differences between taxonomy and systematics - Systematics in thesaurus construction theory - Classic, numerical and cladist systematics - Classic systematics in information science - Numerical systematics in information science - Thesauri in cladist systematics - Systematics in information technology - Some examples 5. Thesauri in systems theory Historical evolution - Approach to systems - Systems theory applied to the construction of thesauri - Components - Classes of system - Peculiarities of these systems - Working methods - Systems theory applied to ontologies and taxonomies

0.004020568 = product of:
  0.012061703 = sum of:
    0.012061703 = product of:
      0.036185108 = sum of:
        0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036185108 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

0.004020568 = product of:
  0.012061703 = sum of:
    0.012061703 = product of:
      0.036185108 = sum of:
        0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036185108 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

0.0031882972 = product of:
  0.009564891 = sum of:
    0.009564891 = product of:
      0.028694674 = sum of:
        0.028694674 = weight(_text_:science in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028694674 = score(doc=4729,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The task of an information architect is to create web sites where users can actually find the information they are looking for. As the ocean of information rises and leaves what we seek ever more deeply buried in what we don't seek, this discipline becomes ever more relevant. Information architecture involves many different aspects of web site creation and organization, but its principal tools are information organization techniques developed in other disciplines. Most of these techniques come from library science, such as thesauri, taxonomies, and faceted classification. Topic maps are a relative newcomer to this area and bring with them the promise of better-organized web sites, compared to what is possible with existing techniques. However, it is not generally understood how topic maps relate to the traditional techniques, and what advantages and disadvantages they have, compared to these techniques. The aim of this paper is to help build a better understanding of these issues.

Source

Journal of information science. 30(2005) no.4, S.378-391

0.0026803787 = product of:
  0.008041136 = sum of:
    0.008041136 = product of:
      0.024123406 = sum of:
        0.024123406 = weight(_text_:29 in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024123406 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

0.0018787221 = product of:
  0.0056361663 = sum of:
    0.0056361663 = product of:
      0.016908498 = sum of:
        0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016908498 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Malaysian journal of library and information science. 20(2015), no.3, S.47-62

0.0018787221 = product of:
  0.0056361663 = sum of:
    0.0056361663 = product of:
      0.016908498 = sum of:
        0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016908498 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1348-1366

0.0018787221 = product of:
  0.0056361663 = sum of:
    0.0056361663 = product of:
      0.016908498 = sum of:
        0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016908498 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowl­edge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowl­edge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowl­edge organization systems to increase information and knowl­edge storage and retrieval performance.

0.0015029777 = product of:
  0.004508933 = sum of:
    0.004508933 = product of:
      0.013526798 = sum of:
        0.013526798 = weight(_text_:science in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013526798 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

LCSH is known as such since 1975. It always has created headings to serve the LC collections instead of a theoretical basis. It started to replace cross reference codes by thesaural codes in 1986, in a mechanical fashion. It was in no way transformed into a thesaurus. Its encyclopedic coverage, its pre-coordinate concepts make it substantially distinct, considering that thesauri usually map a restricted field of knowledge and use uniterms. The questions raised are whether the new symbols comply with thesaurus standards and if they are true to one or to several models. Explanations and definitions from other lists of subject headings and thesauri, literature in the field of classification and subject indexing will provide some answers. For instance, see refers from a subject heading not used to another or others used. Exceptionally it will lead from a specific term to a more general one. Some equate a see reference with the equivalence relationship. Such relationships are pointed by USE in LCSH. See also references are made from the broader subject to narrower parts of it and also between associated subjects. They suggest lateral or vertical connexions as well as reciprocal relationships. They serve a coordination purpose for some, lay down a methodical search itinerary for others. Since their inception in the 1950's thesauri have been devised for indexing and retrieving information in the fields of science and technology. Eventually they attended to a number of social sciences and humanities. Research derived from thesauri was voluminous. Numerous guidelines are designed. They did not discriminate between the "hard" sciences and the social sciences. RT relationships are widely but diversely used in numerous controlled vocabularies. LCSH's aim is to achieve a list almost free of RT and SA references. It thus restricts relationships to BT/NT, USE and UF. This raises the question as to whether all fields of knowledge can "fit" in the Procrustean bed of RT/NT, i.e., genus/species relationships. Standard codes were devised. It was soon realized that BT/NT, well suited to the genus/species couple could not signal a whole-part relationship. In LCSH, BT and NT function as reciprocals, the whole-part relationship is taken into account by ISO. It is amply elaborated upon by authors. The part-whole connexion is sometimes studied apart. The decision to replace cross reference codes was an improvement. Relations can now be distinguished through the distinct needs of numerous fields of knowledge are not attended to. Topic inclusion, and topic-subtopic, could provide the missing link where genus/species or whole/part are inadequate. Distinct codes, BT/NT and whole/part, should be provided. Sorting relationships with mechanical means can only lead to confusion.

0.0015029777 = product of:
  0.004508933 = sum of:
    0.004508933 = product of:
      0.013526798 = sum of:
        0.013526798 = weight(_text_:science in 4800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013526798 = score(doc=4800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044112243 = queryNorm
            0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 4800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4800)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Article Outline 1. Introduction 2. SKOS-based multilingual thesaurus of geological time scale 2.1. Addressing the insufficiency of SKOS in the context of the Semantic Web 2.2. Addressing semantics and syntax/lexicon in multilingual GTS terms 2.3. Extending SKOS model to capture GTS structure 2.4. Summary of building the SKOS-based MLTGTS 3. Recognizing and translating GTS terms retrieved from WMS 4. Pilot system, results, and evaluation 5. Discussion 6. Conclusions Vgl. unter: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MiamiImageURL&_cid=271720&_user=3865853&_pii=S0098300411000744&_check=y&_origin=&_coverDate=31-Oct-2011&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlt-zSkzS&_valck=1&md5=e2c1daf53df72d034d22278212578f42&ie=/sdarticle.pdf.