-
Osigwe, C.C.: ¬The effect of semantic and syntactic relationships in the choice of descriptor elements for precision in document indexing and information retrieval (1992)
0.06
0.062422417 = product of:
0.16645978 = sum of:
0.089885905 = weight(_text_:storage in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089885905 = score(doc=4238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1866346 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
0.047981054 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047981054 = score(doc=4238,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10360982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
0.02859283 = weight(_text_:systems in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02859283 = score(doc=4238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10526281 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Examines some of the problems arising from the interaction between semantic and syntactic relationships in the working of information retrieval systems and proposes the introduction of a generalised thesaurus, universal programs for database storage and retrieval and for the construction of a common data input format for international information exchange
-
Amirhosseini, M.; Avidan, G.: ¬A dialectic perspective on the evolution of thesauri and ontologies (2021)
0.04
0.03916688 = product of:
0.10444501 = sum of:
0.05617869 = weight(_text_:storage in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05617869 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1866346 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.30100897 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
0.01731367 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01731367 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10360982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
0.03095265 = weight(_text_:systems in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03095265 = score(doc=592,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10526281 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.29405114 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowledge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowledge organization systems to increase information and knowledge storage and retrieval performance.
-
Williamson, N.J.: Thesauri in the digital age : stability and dynamism in their development and use (2000)
0.03
0.029396944 = product of:
0.117587775 = sum of:
0.089885905 = weight(_text_:storage in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089885905 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1866346 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.48161435 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.027701873 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027701873 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10360982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The latest thesaurus guidelines, ISO 2788 and ANSI/NISO Z39.19-1993, were published before many recent changes in the nature of databases, and before the full impact of the Internet on information storage and retrieval. The major changes are addressed in light of implications for reconsideration and possible revision of the guidelines
-
Amirhosseini, M.: Quantitative evaluation of the movement from complexity toward simplicity in the structure of thesaurus descriptors (2015)
0.02
0.01837309 = product of:
0.07349236 = sum of:
0.05617869 = weight(_text_:storage in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05617869 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1866346 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.30100897 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4488444 = idf(docFreq=516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
0.01731367 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01731367 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10360982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.034252144 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The concepts of simplicity and complexity play major roles in information storage and retrieval in knowledge organizations. This paper reports an investigation of these concepts in the structure of descriptors. The main purpose of simplicity is to decrease the number of words in the construction of descriptors as this idea affects semantic relations, recall and precision. ISO 25964 has affirmed the purpose of simplicity by requiring splitting compound terms into simpler concepts. This work aims to elaborate the standard methods of evaluation by providing a more detailed evaluation of the descriptors structure and identifying effective factors in simplicity and complexity results in the structure of thesauri descriptors. The research population is taken from the descriptors of the Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (CAB) Thesaurus, the Persian Cultural Thesaurus (ASFA) and the Chemical Thesaurus. This research was conducted using the statistical and content analysis method. In this research we propose a new quantitative approach as well as novel indicators and indices involving Simplicity and Factoring Ratios to evaluate the descriptors structure. The results will be useful in the verification, selection and maintenance purposes in knowledge organizations and the inquiry method can be further developed in the field of ontology evaluation.
