-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.07
0.07070447 = product of:
0.14140894 = sum of:
0.14140894 = sum of:
0.056415144 = weight(_text_:research in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056415144 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08499379 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
- Source
- Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.05
0.04713631 = product of:
0.09427262 = sum of:
0.09427262 = sum of:
0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037610095 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.056662526 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056662526 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998)
0.04
0.04124427 = product of:
0.08248854 = sum of:
0.08248854 = sum of:
0.03290883 = weight(_text_:research in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03290883 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957971 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Getty has a lenghty history in the research and development of thesauri and other structured vocabulary tools to make the use and exchange of electronic information easier
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004)
0.04
0.04124427 = product of:
0.08248854 = sum of:
0.08248854 = sum of:
0.03290883 = weight(_text_:research in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03290883 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957971 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this selected bibliography is to introduce issues and problems in relation to thesaurus construction and to present a set of readings that may be used in practical thesaurus design. The concept of thesaurus is discussed, the purpose of the thesaurus and how the concept has evolved over the years according to new IR technologies. Different approaches to thesaurus construction are introduced, and readings dealing with specific problems and developments in the collection, formation and organisation of thesaurus concepts and terms are presented. Primarily manual construction methods are discussed, but the bibliography also refers to research about techniques for automatic thesaurus construction.
- Date
- 18. 5.2006 20:06:22
-
Bagheri, M.: Development of thesauri in Iran (2006)
0.04
0.04119421 = product of:
0.08238842 = sum of:
0.08238842 = sum of:
0.03989153 = weight(_text_:research in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03989153 = score(doc=260,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042496894 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The need for Persian thesauri became apparent during the late 1960s with the advent of documentation centres in Iran. The first Persian controlled vocabulary was published by IRANDOC in 1977. Other centres worked on translations of existing thesauri, but it was soon realised that these efforts did not meet the needs of the centres. After the Islamic revolution in 1979, the foundation of new centres intensified the need for Persian thesauri, especially in the fields of history and government documents. Also, during the Iran-Iraq war, Iranian research centres produced reports in scientific and technical fields, both to support military requirements and to meet society's needs. In order to provide a comprehensive thesaurus, the Council of Scientific Research of Iran approved a project for the compilation of such a work. Nowadays, 12 Persian thesauri are available and others are being prepared, based on the literary corpus and conformity with characteristics of Iranian culture.
- Source
- Indexer. 25(2006) no.1, S.19-22
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.02
0.024029957 = product of:
0.048059914 = sum of:
0.048059914 = sum of:
0.02327006 = weight(_text_:research in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02327006 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.15602253 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.024789855 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024789855 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.02
0.021248447 = product of:
0.042496894 = sum of:
0.042496894 = product of:
0.08499379 = sum of:
0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08499379 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
-
Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995)
0.01
0.0141656315 = product of:
0.028331263 = sum of:
0.028331263 = product of:
0.056662526 = sum of:
0.056662526 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056662526 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
-
Soergel, D.: Data structure and software support for for integrated thesauri (1996)
0.01
0.014103786 = product of:
0.028207572 = sum of:
0.028207572 = product of:
0.056415144 = sum of:
0.056415144 = weight(_text_:research in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056415144 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Compatibility and integration of order systems: Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995
-
Hudon, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri : the Canadian Literacy Thesaurus experience (1992)
0.01
0.013297176 = product of:
0.026594352 = sum of:
0.026594352 = product of:
0.053188704 = sum of:
0.053188704 = weight(_text_:research in 2107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053188704 = score(doc=2107,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 2107, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Roulin, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus (1992)
0.01
0.013297176 = product of:
0.026594352 = sum of:
0.026594352 = product of:
0.053188704 = sum of:
0.053188704 = weight(_text_:research in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053188704 = score(doc=2112,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Eastman, C.M.: Overlaps in postings to thesaurus terms : a preliminary study (1988)
0.01
0.012394927 = product of:
0.024789855 = sum of:
0.024789855 = product of:
0.04957971 = sum of:
0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957971 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:52:34
-
Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990)
0.01
0.012394927 = product of:
0.024789855 = sum of:
0.024789855 = product of:
0.04957971 = sum of:
0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957971 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1996 3:39:53
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.01
0.012394927 = product of:
0.024789855 = sum of:
0.024789855 = product of:
0.04957971 = sum of:
0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957971 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
-
Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005)
0.01
0.012394927 = product of:
0.024789855 = sum of:
0.024789855 = product of:
0.04957971 = sum of:
0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957971 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.2007 19:55:22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.01
0.012394927 = product of:
0.024789855 = sum of:
0.024789855 = product of:
0.04957971 = sum of:
0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04957971 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri (2004)
0.01
0.012214238 = product of:
0.024428476 = sum of:
0.024428476 = product of:
0.04885695 = sum of:
0.04885695 = weight(_text_:research in 5008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04885695 = score(doc=5008,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.3275791 = fieldWeight in 5008, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5008)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While information retrieval thesauri may improve search results, there is little research documenting whether general information system users employ these vocabulary tools. This article explores user comprehension and searching with thesauri. Data was gathered as part of a larger empirical query-expansion study involving the ProQuest Controlled Vocabulary. The results suggest that users' knowledge of thesauri is extremely limited. After receiving a basic thesaurus introduction, however, users indicate a desire to employ these tools. The most significant result was that users expressed a preference for thesauri employment through interactive processing or a combination of automatic and interactive processing, compared to exclusively automatic processing. This article defines information retrieval thesauri, summarizes research results, considers circumstances underlying users' knowledge and searching with thesauri, and highlights future research needs.
-
Muraszkiewicz, M.; Rybinski, H.; Struk, W.: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri (1996)
0.01
0.011753156 = product of:
0.023506312 = sum of:
0.023506312 = product of:
0.047012623 = sum of:
0.047012623 = weight(_text_:research in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047012623 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Compatibility and integration of order systems: Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999)
0.01
0.010624223 = product of:
0.021248447 = sum of:
0.021248447 = product of:
0.042496894 = sum of:
0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042496894 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
-
Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004)
0.01
0.010624223 = product of:
0.021248447 = sum of:
0.021248447 = product of:
0.042496894 = sum of:
0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042496894 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:46:13
