Search (62 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Brown, C.: Communication in the sciences (2010) 0.02
    0.015737087 = product of:
      0.031474173 = sum of:
        0.031474173 = product of:
          0.09442252 = sum of:
            0.09442252 = weight(_text_:c in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09442252 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.01
    0.014191686 = product of:
      0.028383372 = sum of:
        0.028383372 = product of:
          0.085150115 = sum of:
            0.085150115 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085150115 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  3. Wellisch, H.H.: Indexing and abstracting 1977-1981 : an international bibliography (1984) 0.01
    0.014111667 = product of:
      0.028223334 = sum of:
        0.028223334 = product of:
          0.08467 = sum of:
            0.08467 = weight(_text_:i in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08467 = score(doc=1453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International classification 13(1986) S.103 (I. Dahlberg)
  4. ¬The year in reference (1994) 0.01
    0.014111667 = product of:
      0.028223334 = sum of:
        0.028223334 = product of:
          0.08467 = sum of:
            0.08467 = weight(_text_:i in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08467 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    i
  5. ¬The year in reference (1994) 0.01
    0.014111667 = product of:
      0.028223334 = sum of:
        0.028223334 = product of:
          0.08467 = sum of:
            0.08467 = weight(_text_:i in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08467 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    i
  6. Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The use of Web search engines in information science research (2003) 0.01
    0.014111667 = product of:
      0.028223334 = sum of:
        0.028223334 = product of:
          0.08467 = sum of:
            0.08467 = weight(_text_:i in 4271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08467 = score(doc=4271,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 4271, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web was created in 1989, but it has already become a major information channel and source, influencing our everyday lives, commercial transactions, and scientific communication, to mention just a few areas. The seventeenth-century philosopher Descartes proclaimed, "I think, therefore I am" (cogito, ergo sum). Today the Web is such an integral part of our lives that we could rephrase Descartes' statement as "I have a Web presence, therefore I am." Because many people, companies, and organizations take this notion seriously, in addition to more substantial reasons for publishing information an the Web, the number of Web pages is in the billions and growing constantly. However, it is not sufficient to have a Web presence; tools that enable users to locate Web pages are needed as well. The major tools for discovering and locating information an the Web are search engines. This review discusses the use of Web search engines in information science research. Before going into detail, we should define the terms "information science," "Web search engine," and "use" in the context of this review.
  7. Blake, C.: Text mining (2011) 0.01
    0.01376995 = product of:
      0.0275399 = sum of:
        0.0275399 = product of:
          0.0826197 = sum of:
            0.0826197 = weight(_text_:c in 1599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0826197 = score(doc=1599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 1599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1599)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Yu, N.: Readings & Web resources for faceted classification 0.01
    0.012221063 = product of:
      0.024442125 = sum of:
        0.024442125 = product of:
          0.07332637 = sum of:
            0.07332637 = weight(_text_:i in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07332637 = score(doc=4394,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" has been used in various places, while in most cases it is just a buzz word to replace what is indeed "aspect" or "category". The references below either define and explain the original concept of facet or provide guidelines for building 'real' faceted search/browse. I was interested in faceted classification because it seems to be a natural and efficient way for organizing and browsing Web collections. However, to automatically generate facets and their isolates is extremely difficult since it involves concept extraction and concept grouping, both of which are difficult problems by themselves. And it is almost impossible to achieve mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive 'true' facets without human judgment. Nowadays, faceted search/browse widely exists, implicitly or explicitly, on a majority of retail websites due to the multi-aspects nature of the data. However, it is still rarely seen on any digital library sites. (I could be wrong since I haven't kept myself updated with this field for a while.)
  9. Bober, C.; Poulin, S.; Vileno, L.: Evaluating library instruction in academic libraries : a critical review of the literature, 1980-1993 (1995) 0.01
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.02360563 = sum of:
        0.02360563 = product of:
          0.07081689 = sum of:
            0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 5349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07081689 = score(doc=5349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 5349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5349)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. T.1: Classification systems and thesauri, 1950-1982 (1982) // T.2: Reference tools and conferences in classification and indexing (1984) // T.3: Classification- and indexing systems: theory - structure - methodology, 1950-1982 (1985) // T.4: On universal and special classification systems and thesauri (in Vorb.) // T.5: Language foundation, apllication and environment of classification and indexing (in Vorb.) : International classification and indexing bibliography (ICIB) (1982-) 0.01
    0.011641531 = product of:
      0.023283063 = sum of:
        0.023283063 = product of:
          0.069849186 = sum of:
            0.069849186 = weight(_text_:i in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069849186 = score(doc=2839,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Diese (zum Thema umfangreichste) Bibliographie wird durch eine ständige Rubrik in der Zeitschrift 'International Classification' laufend ergänzt; danach fortgesetzt in: Knowledge organization. - Vgl. zum verwendeten Klassifikationssystem: Dahlberg, I. u.a. in: International classification 9(1982) S.87-93; 12(1985) S.143-152.
    Editor
    Dahlberg, I.
  11. Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994) 0.01
    0.010136919 = product of:
      0.020273838 = sum of:
        0.020273838 = product of:
          0.060821515 = sum of:
            0.060821515 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060821515 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
  12. Efthimiadis, E.N.; Neilson, C.: ¬A classified bibliography on online public access catalogues (1989) 0.01
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.019671358 = sum of:
        0.019671358 = product of:
          0.05901407 = sum of:
            0.05901407 = weight(_text_:c in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05901407 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Ruschoff, C.: ¬The year's work in descriptive cataloging : 1989 (1990) 0.01
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.019671358 = sum of:
        0.019671358 = product of:
          0.05901407 = sum of:
            0.05901407 = weight(_text_:c in 3316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05901407 = score(doc=3316,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3316, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3316)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Franklin, C.: ¬A bibliography on hypertext and hypermedia with selected annotations (1990) 0.01
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.019671358 = sum of:
        0.019671358 = product of:
          0.05901407 = sum of:
            0.05901407 = weight(_text_:c in 3511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05901407 = score(doc=3511,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3511, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3511)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Drabenstott, K.M.; Burman, C.M.: Analytical review of the library of the future (1994) 0.01
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.019671358 = sum of:
        0.019671358 = product of:
          0.05901407 = sum of:
            0.05901407 = weight(_text_:c in 3658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05901407 = score(doc=3658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3658)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.1, S.60-61 (C. Oppenheim)
  16. Robertson, S.E.: Theories and models in information retrieval (1977) 0.01
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.018815555 = sum of:
        0.018815555 = product of:
          0.056446664 = sum of:
            0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 1844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056446664 = score(doc=1844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1844)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is concerned with recent work in the theory of information retrieval. More particularly, it is concerned with theories which tackle the problem of retrieval performance, in a sense which will be explained. The aim is not an exhaustive survey of such work; rather it is an analysis and synthesis of those contributions which I feel to be important or find interesting
  17. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996) 0.01
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.018815555 = sum of:
        0.018815555 = product of:
          0.056446664 = sum of:
            0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056446664 = score(doc=7170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Blair, D.C.: Information retrieval and the philosophy of language (2002) 0.01
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.018815555 = sum of:
        0.018815555 = product of:
          0.056446664 = sum of:
            0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056446664 = score(doc=4283,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval - the retrieval, primarily, of documents or textual material - is fundamentally a linguistic process. At the very least we must describe what we want and match that description with descriptions of the information that is available to us. Furthermore, when we describe what we want, we must mean something by that description. This is a deceptively simple act, but such linguistic events have been the grist for philosophical analysis since Aristotle. Although there are complexities involved in referring to authors, document types, or other categories of information retrieval context, here I wish to focus an one of the most problematic activities in information retrieval: the description of the intellectual content of information items. And even though I take information retrieval to involve the description and retrieval of written text, what I say here is applicable to any information item whose intellectual content can be described for retrieval-books, documents, images, audio clips, video clips, scientific specimens, engineering schematics, and so forth. For convenience, though, I will refer only to the description and retrieval of documents. The description of intellectual content can go wrong in many obvious ways. We may describe what we want incorrectly; we may describe it correctly but in such general terms that its description is useless for retrieval; or we may describe what we want correctly, but misinterpret the descriptions of available information, and thereby match our description of what we want incorrectly. From a linguistic point of view, we can be misunderstood in the process of retrieval in many ways. Because the philosophy of language deals specifically with how we are understood and mis-understood, it should have some use for understanding the process of description in information retrieval. First, however, let us examine more closely the kinds of misunderstandings that can occur in information retrieval. We use language in searching for information in two principal ways. We use it to describe what we want and to discriminate what we want from other information that is available to us but that we do not want. Description and discrimination together articulate the goals of the information search process; they also delineate the two principal ways in which language can fail us in this process. Van Rijsbergen (1979) was the first to make this distinction, calling them "representation" and "discrimination.""
  19. Oppenheim, C.; Morris, A.; McKnight, C.: ¬The evaluation of WWW search engines (2000) 0.01
    0.008345851 = product of:
      0.016691701 = sum of:
        0.016691701 = product of:
          0.050075103 = sum of:
            0.050075103 = weight(_text_:c in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050075103 = score(doc=4546,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992) 0.01
    0.008109535 = product of:
      0.01621907 = sum of:
        0.01621907 = product of:
          0.04865721 = sum of:
            0.04865721 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04865721 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22

Years

Types

  • a 51
  • b 14
  • m 4
  • i 3
  • el 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…