Search (105 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Weibel, S.: ¬The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative : The Frankfurt Focus and the Year 2000 (2000) 0.03
    0.025349235 = product of:
      0.0760477 = sum of:
        0.05012741 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05012741 = score(doc=4450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 4450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4450)
        0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 4450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025920296 = score(doc=4450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 4450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4450)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core Metadata Iniative (DCMI) is nearing the fifth anniversary of what has become the broadest international, interdisciplinary effort in resource description on the Internet. It is the leading initiative for improving resource discovery on the Web. Die Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt hosted the 7th of the series of international metadata workshops of this 5-year-old-initiative. This article reviews the progress made during 1999 and summarizes some of the developments resulting from the Frankfurt meeting and how these developments can be expected to shape DCMI activities for the year 2000
  2. Lam, V.-T.: Cataloging Internet resources : Why, what, how (2000) 0.02
    0.02340877 = product of:
      0.07022631 = sum of:
        0.05795955 = weight(_text_:internet in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05795955 = score(doc=967,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.5105517 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
        0.012266762 = product of:
          0.036800284 = sum of:
            0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800284 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Internet resources have brought great excitement but also grave concerns to the library world, especially to the cataloging community. In spite of the various problematic aspects presented by Internet resources (poorly organized, lack of stability, variable quality), catalogers have decided that they are worth cataloging, in particular those meeting library selection criteria. This paper tries to trace the decade-long history of the library comrnunity's efforts in providing an effective way to catalog Internet resources. Basically, its olbjective is to answer the following questions: Why catalog? What to catalog? and, How to catalog. Some issues of cataloging electronic journals and developments of the Dublin Core Metadata system are also discussed.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.49-61
    Theme
    Internet
  3. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01
    0.014505414 = product of:
      0.04351624 = sum of:
        0.029623196 = weight(_text_:internet in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029623196 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.0138930455 = product of:
          0.041679136 = sum of:
            0.041679136 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041679136 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  4. Schroeder, K.: Persistent Identifiers im Kontext der Langzeitarchivierung : EPICUR auf dem 2. Bibliothekskongress in Leipzig (2004) 0.01
    0.014485277 = product of:
      0.04345583 = sum of:
        0.028644232 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028644232 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.18144052 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
        0.014811598 = weight(_text_:internet in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014811598 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Mit elektronischem Publizieren werden folgende Eigenschaften verbunden: »schnell, kostengünstig, weltweit«. Aber ist das aus Nutzersicht bzw. aus der Perspektive der Autoren ausreichend, um eine Online-Veröffentlichung dauerhaft zu nutzen und zuverlässig zu zitieren? Ein Mechanismus, mit dem netzbasierte Publikationen eindeutig gekennzeichnet werden und jederzeit auffindbar sind, wird durch flüchtige Uniform Resource Locator (URLs) nicht bereitgestellt. Eine Lösung bieten Persistent Identifiers (Pls), wie z. B. Uniform Resource Names (URN)". Damit die Anwendung eines persistenten Adressierungsschemas wie den URNs langfristig gewährleistet werden kann, muss eine Infrastruktur mit einer institutionellen Unterstützung geschaffen werden. Ein wesentlicher Aspekt in diesem Kontext ist die Langzeitarchivierung der digitalen Objekte. Die Darstellung und Erläuterung der Schnittstellen zwischen Langzeitarchivierung und Pls sowie der damit verbundenen Aktivitäten und Ergebnisse des EPICUR-Projektes war Gegenstand des Vortrages von Kathrin Schroeder auf dem diesjährigen z. Bibliothekskongress in Leipzig im Rahmen des Workshops »Technische Aspekte der Langzeitarchivierung«". Es besteht ein enger Zusammenhang zwischen den Bereichen Pls (standortunabhängige, eindeutige Bezeichner für digitale Objekte) und Langzeitarchivierung (Maßnahmen, die dazu dienen, digitale Objekte für die Nachwelt dauerhaft zu erhalten): Pls werden als stabiler Zugriffsmechanismus für digitale Objekte verwendet, die in einem Depotsystem archiviert werden. Ein Depotsystem ist ein »( ...) Archiv für digitale Objekte, in dem Menschen und Systeme als 'Organisation' mit der Aufgabenstellung zusammenwirken, Informationen zu erhalten und einer definierten Nutzerschaft verfügbar zu machen.« Dazu gehören im erweiterten Sinne auch eine Infrastruktur vor der Eingangsschnittstelle des Depotsystems, die zum Transfer digitaler Objekte von den Produzenten in das Archiv dient, und die Infrastruktur der Endnutzer-Umgebungen hinter der Auslieferungsschnittstelle des Depotsystems, in denen die digitalen Objekte benutzt werden sollen. In diesem Umfeld werden Pls in folgenden Bereichen angewendet: - Metadaten, - Datenaustauschformate, - Automatisierte Lieferungen von Objekten in ein Archivsystem, - Depotsystem und - Nutzung von Pls als stabiler Zugriffsmechanismus auf ein Objekt als wichtigster Aspekt für den Endnutzer (Wissenschaftler und Autoren). Im Folgenden werden zu den einzelnen Bereichen die Ergebnisse des EPICUR-Projektes und die Aktivitäten Der Deutschen Bibliothek diskutiert.
    Theme
    Internet
  5. Strötgen, R.: Treatment of semantic heterogeneity using meta-data extraction and query translation (2002) 0.01
    0.012729019 = product of:
      0.038187057 = sum of:
        0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025920296 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
        0.012266762 = product of:
          0.036800284 = sum of:
            0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800284 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The project CARMEN ("Content Analysis, Retrieval and Metadata: Effective Networking") aimed - among other goals - at improving the expansion of searches in bibliographic databases into Internet searches. We pursued a set of different approaches to the treatment of semantic heterogeneity (meta-data extraction, query translation using statistic relations and Cross-concordances). This paper describes the concepts and implementation of these approaches and the evaluation of the impact for the retrieval result.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  6. Aulik, J.L.; Burt, H.A.; Gruby, E.; Morgan, A.; O'Halloran, C.: Online mentoring : a student experience at Dominican University (2002) 0.01
    0.012729019 = product of:
      0.038187057 = sum of:
        0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025920296 = score(doc=5465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
        0.012266762 = product of:
          0.036800284 = sum of:
            0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800284 = score(doc=5465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the online learning experience of seven students in the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at Dominican University. In a class entitled Metadata for Internet Resources, the students developed a distance learning relationship with professional catalogers. Student assignments included posting bibliographic records on the WebBoardTM for mentor input. In an online exchange, the mentors responded by posting their suggestions for improving student records. The interaction between students and mentors is discussed, as is the educational value of distance learning.
    Date
    29. 7.2006 18:19:46
  7. Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05) 0.01
    0.012692237 = product of:
      0.03807671 = sum of:
        0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025920296 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.012156415 = product of:
          0.036469243 = sum of:
            0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036469243 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:35:22
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 7(2004/05) nos.3/4, S.1-15
  8. Korb, N.; Wollschläger, T.: Koordinierungsstelle DissOnline auf dem 2. Bibliothekskongress in Leipzig : Strategien zur Lösung von technischen und Rechtsfragen bei Online-Hochschulschriften (2004) 0.01
    0.010127267 = product of:
      0.060763597 = sum of:
        0.060763597 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060763597 = score(doc=2385,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.38489348 = fieldWeight in 2385, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2385)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Zur Unterstützung von Autoren, Bibliotheken, Verlagen und weiteren Institutionen bei der Publikation von elektronischen Hochschulschriften sowie zur Förderung ihrer Verbreitung und Nutzung wurde 2001 auf Empfehlung des Projektes der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) »Dissertationen Online« die Koordinierungsstelle DissOnline an Der Deutschen Bibliothek eingerichtet. Die Koordinierungsstelle hat sich inzwischen in Deutschland etabliert. Seit ihrer Gründung 2001 führte die Koordinierungsstelle auf jedem Bibliothekartag eine Veranstaltung durch. Auf dem diesjährigen 2. Bibliothekskongress in Leipzig wurde in einer Einführung von Dr. Thomas Wollschläger (die Deutsche Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main) über die aktuelle Arbeit der Koordinierungsstelle berichtet. Es wurden neue Entwicklungen bei der Informationsvermittlung mittels DissOnline vorgestellt und es konnte sowohl eine wachsende Nutzung der Möglichkeit zur OnlinePublikation als auch ein verstärkter Zugriff - auf Online-Hochschulschriften selbst verzeichnet werden. Deutlich wurden dabei auch die Vorteile der Metadaten für eine effektive Nutzung der Online-Veröffentlichungen.
  9. Weibel, S.L.; Miller, E.J.: Image Description on the Internet : Summary of CNI/OCLC Image Metadata Workshop (2001) 0.01
    0.008727819 = product of:
      0.05236691 = sum of:
        0.05236691 = weight(_text_:internet in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05236691 = score(doc=1045,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.46128747 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part I
  10. O'Neill, E.T.; Lavoie, B.F.; McClain, P.D.: Web Characterization Project : An Analysis of Metadata Usage on the Web (2001) 0.01
    0.008727819 = product of:
      0.05236691 = sum of:
        0.05236691 = weight(_text_:internet in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05236691 = score(doc=1061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.46128747 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part II
    Theme
    Internet
  11. Weinheimer, J.L.: How to keep the practice of librarianship relevant in the age of the Internet (2000) 0.01
    0.008640099 = product of:
      0.051840592 = sum of:
        0.051840592 = weight(_text_:internet in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051840592 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  12. Zhang, J.; Dimitroff, A.: Internet search engines' response to Metadata Dublin Core implementation (2005) 0.01
    0.008640099 = product of:
      0.051840592 = sum of:
        0.051840592 = weight(_text_:internet in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051840592 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  13. Hunter, J.L.: ¬A survey of metadata research for organizing the Web (2004) 0.01
    0.00855148 = product of:
      0.05130888 = sum of:
        0.05130888 = weight(_text_:internet in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05130888 = score(doc=2117,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.45196757 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article attempts to provide an overview of the key metadata research issues and the current projects and initiatives that are investigating methods and developing technologies aimed at improving our ability to discover, access, retrieve, and assimilate information on the Internet through the use of metadata.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Organizing the Internet
    Theme
    Internet
  14. Henshaw, R.; Valauskas, E.J.: Metadata as a catalyst: : experiments with metadata and search engines in the Internet journal, First Monday (2001) 0.01
    0.007405799 = product of:
      0.044434793 = sum of:
        0.044434793 = weight(_text_:internet in 7098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044434793 = score(doc=7098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.3914154 = fieldWeight in 7098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7098)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  15. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.01
    0.007252707 = product of:
      0.02175812 = sum of:
        0.014811598 = weight(_text_:internet in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014811598 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
        0.0069465227 = product of:
          0.020839568 = sum of:
            0.020839568 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020839568 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Dublin Core is often presented as a modern form of catalog card -- a set of elements (and now qualifiers) that describe resources in a complete package. Sometimes it is proposed as an exchange format for sharing records among multiple collections. The founding principle that "every element is optional and repeatable" reinforces the notion that a Dublin Core description is to be taken as a whole. This paper, in contrast, is based on a much different premise: Dublin Core is a language. More precisely, it is a small language for making a particular class of statements about resources. Like natural languages, it has a vocabulary of word-like terms, the two classes of which -- elements and qualifiers -- function within statements like nouns and adjectives; and it has a syntax for arranging elements and qualifiers into statements according to a simple pattern. Whenever tourists order a meal or ask directions in an unfamiliar language, considerate native speakers will spontaneously limit themselves to basic words and simple sentence patterns along the lines of "I am so-and-so" or "This is such-and-such". Linguists call this pidginization. In such situations, a small phrase book or translated menu can be most helpful. By analogy, today's Web has been called an Internet Commons where users and information providers from a wide range of scientific, commercial, and social domains present their information in a variety of incompatible data models and description languages. In this context, Dublin Core presents itself as a metadata pidgin for digital tourists who must find their way in this linguistically diverse landscape. Its vocabulary is small enough to learn quickly, and its basic pattern is easily grasped. It is well-suited to serve as an auxiliary language for digital libraries. This grammar starts by defining terms. It then follows a 200-year-old tradition of English grammar teaching by focusing on the structure of single statements. It concludes by looking at the growing dictionary of Dublin Core vocabulary terms -- its registry, and at how statements can be used to build the metadata equivalent of paragraphs and compositions -- the application profile.
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  16. Hickey, T.R.: CORC : a system for gateway creation (2000) 0.01
    0.0061094724 = product of:
      0.036656834 = sum of:
        0.036656834 = weight(_text_:internet in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036656834 = score(doc=4870,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    CORC is an OCLC project that id developing tools and systems to enable libraries to provide enhanced access to Internet resources. By adapting and extending library techniques and procedures, we are developing a self-supporting system capable of describing a large and useful subset of the Web. CORC is more a system for hosting and supporting subject gateways than a gateway itself and relies on large-scale cooperation among libraries to maintain a centralized database. By supporting emerging metadata standards such as Dublin Core and other standards such as Unicode and RDF, CORC broadens the range of libraries and librarians able to participate. Current plans are for OCLC as a full service in July 2000
    Theme
    Internet
  17. Zhang, J.; Jastram, I.: ¬A study of the metadata creation behavior of different user groups on the Internet (2006) 0.01
    0.0061094724 = product of:
      0.036656834 = sum of:
        0.036656834 = weight(_text_:internet in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036656834 = score(doc=982,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is designed to improve information organization and information retrieval effectiveness and efficiency on the Internet. The way web publishers respond to metadata and the way they use it when publishing their web pages, however, is still a mystery. The authors of this paper aim to solve this mystery by defining different professional publisher groups, examining the behaviors of these user groups, and identifying the characteristics of their metadata use. This study will enhance the current understanding of metadata application behavior and provide evidence useful to researchers, web publishers, and search engine designers.
  18. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.00
    0.0046310155 = product of:
      0.027786091 = sum of:
        0.027786091 = product of:
          0.08335827 = sum of:
            0.08335827 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08335827 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  19. Crowston, K.; Kwasnik, B.H.: Can document-genre metadata improve information access to large digital collections? (2004) 0.00
    0.0043639094 = product of:
      0.026183454 = sum of:
        0.026183454 = weight(_text_:internet in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026183454 = score(doc=824,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.23064373 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Organizing the Internet
    Theme
    Internet
  20. Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001) 0.00
    0.0043200497 = product of:
      0.025920296 = sum of:
        0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025920296 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 4(2001) nos.1/2, S.35-47

Types