-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.03
0.03057753 = product of:
0.07644382 = sum of:
0.031760663 = weight(_text_:information in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031760663 = score(doc=4407,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.044683155 = product of:
0.08936631 = sum of:
0.08936631 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08936631 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
- Source
- Government information quarterly. 18(2001) S.155-165
-
Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000)
0.02
0.020820383 = product of:
0.052050956 = sum of:
0.02970938 = weight(_text_:information in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02970938 = score(doc=4866,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:54
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.40-45
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.019183239 = product of:
0.0479581 = sum of:
0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016041556 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.03191654 = product of:
0.06383308 = sum of:
0.06383308 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06383308 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.02
0.019183239 = product of:
0.0479581 = sum of:
0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016041556 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.03191654 = product of:
0.06383308 = sum of:
0.06383308 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06383308 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.02
0.019183239 = product of:
0.0479581 = sum of:
0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016041556 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.03191654 = product of:
0.06383308 = sum of:
0.06383308 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06383308 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.02
0.019104427 = product of:
0.047761068 = sum of:
0.022227835 = weight(_text_:information in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022227835 = score(doc=4867,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.02
0.019104427 = product of:
0.047761068 = sum of:
0.022227835 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022227835 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998)
0.02
0.018980235 = product of:
0.047450587 = sum of:
0.02510901 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02510901 = score(doc=5165,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
- Date
- 9. 9.2000 17:22:23
-
Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018)
0.02
0.017472873 = product of:
0.04368218 = sum of:
0.01814895 = weight(_text_:information in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01814895 = score(doc=4826,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 18. 1.2019 19:13:22
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.02
0.016716374 = product of:
0.041790932 = sum of:
0.019449355 = weight(_text_:information in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019449355 = score(doc=4750,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Metadata schema and standards are now a part of the information landscape. Librarianship has slowly realized that MARC is only one of a proliferation of metadata standards, and that MARC has many pros and cons related to its age, original conception, and biases. Should librarianship continue to promote the MARC standard? Are there better metadata standards out there that are more robust, user-friendly, and dynamic in the organization and presentation of information? This special issue examines current initiatives that are actively incorporating MARC standards and concepts into new metadata schemata, while also predicting a future where MARC may not be the metadata schema of choice for the organization and description of information.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
-
Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005)
0.02
0.015567391 = product of:
0.038918477 = sum of:
0.023576178 = weight(_text_:information in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023576178 = score(doc=4729,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.015342298 = weight(_text_:und in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015342298 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The task of an information architect is to create web sites where users can actually find the information they are looking for. As the ocean of information rises and leaves what we seek ever more deeply buried in what we don't seek, this discipline becomes ever more relevant. Information architecture involves many different aspects of web site creation and organization, but its principal tools are information organization techniques developed in other disciplines. Most of these techniques come from library science, such as thesauri, taxonomies, and faceted classification. Topic maps are a relative newcomer to this area and bring with them the promise of better-organized web sites, compared to what is possible with existing techniques. However, it is not generally understood how topic maps relate to the traditional techniques, and what advantages and disadvantages they have, compared to these techniques. The aim of this paper is to help build a better understanding of these issues.
- Source
- Journal of information science. 30(2005) no.4, S.378-391
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.02
0.015346591 = product of:
0.038366478 = sum of:
0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012833246 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.02
0.015346591 = product of:
0.038366478 = sum of:
0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012833246 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.02
0.015346591 = product of:
0.038366478 = sum of:
0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012833246 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
-
Liechti, O.; Sifer, M.J.; Ichikawa, T.: Structured graph format : XML metadata for describing Web site structure (1998)
0.02
0.015288765 = product of:
0.03822191 = sum of:
0.015880331 = weight(_text_:information in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015880331 = score(doc=3597,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.02
0.015288765 = product of:
0.03822191 = sum of:
0.015880331 = weight(_text_:information in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015880331 = score(doc=2848,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.02
0.015288765 = product of:
0.03822191 = sum of:
0.015880331 = weight(_text_:information in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015880331 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Minas, M.; Shklar, L.: Visualizing information repositories on the World-Wide Web (1996)
0.01
0.014939481 = product of:
0.037348703 = sum of:
0.019449355 = weight(_text_:information in 6267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019449355 = score(doc=6267,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 6267, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6267)
0.017899347 = weight(_text_:und in 6267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017899347 = score(doc=6267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 6267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6267)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The main objective of the proposed high-level 'Visual Repository Definition Language' is to anbale advanced Web presentation of large amounts of exisitng heterogeneous information. Statements of the language serve to describe the desired structure of information repositories, which are composed of metadata entities encapsulating the original data. Such approach helps to to avoid the usual relocation and restructuring of data that occurs when providing Web access to it. The language has been designed to be useful even for inexperienced programmers. Its applicability is demonstrated by a real example, creating a repository of judicial opinions from publicly available raw data
- Source
- Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
-
Masanès, J.; Lupovici, C.: Preservation metadata : the NEDLIB's proposal Bibliothèque Nationale de France (2001)
0.01
0.013836867 = product of:
0.034592167 = sum of:
0.019249868 = weight(_text_:information in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019249868 = score(doc=6013,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
0.015342298 = weight(_text_:und in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015342298 = score(doc=6013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Preservation of digital documents for the long term requires above all to solve the problem of technological obsolescence. Accessing to digital documents in 20 or loo years will be impossible if we, or our successor, can't process the bit stream underlying digital documents. We can be sure that the modality of data processing will be different in 20 or loo years. It is then our task to collect key information about today's data processing to ensure future access to these documents. In this paper we present the NEDLIB's proposal for a preservation metadata set. This set gathers core metadata that are mandatory for preservation management purposes. We propose to define 8 metadata elements and 38 sub-elements following the OAIS taxonomy of information object. A layered information analysis of the digital document is proposed in order to list all information involved in the data processing of the bit stream. These metadata elements are intended to be populate, as much as possible, in an automatic way to make it possible to handle large amounts of documents
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 48(2001) H.3/4, S.194-199
-
Hakala, J.: Dublin core in 1997 : a report from Dublin Core metadata workshops 4 & 5 (1998)
0.01
0.013428268 = product of:
0.03357067 = sum of:
0.01122909 = weight(_text_:information in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01122909 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Creation of more and better metadata, or resource descriptions, is the best means to solve the problems of massive recall and lack of precision associated with Internet information retrieval. Dublin Core Metadata workshops aim to develop the resource descriptions. Describes the 4th workshop held in Canberra March 1997 and the 5th held in Oct. 1997 in Helsinki. DC-4 dealt with element structure with qualifiers language, scheme and type; extensibility issues; and element refinement. DC-5 dealt with element refinement and stability; definition of sub-elements and resource types; and sharing of Dublin Core implementation experiences, one of which is the Nordic Metadata project. The Nordic countries are now well prepared to implement useful new tools built by the Internet metadata community
- Source
- Nordinfo Nytt. 1997, nos.3/4, S.10-22
