-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.04
0.039634123 = product of:
0.11890237 = sum of:
0.11890237 = sum of:
0.080192536 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080192536 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038709838 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Hooland, S. van; Bontemps, Y.; Kaufman, S.: Answering the call for more accountability : applying data profiling to museum metadata (2008)
0.02
0.024857676 = product of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.03586319 = weight(_text_:management in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03586319 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038709838 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although the issue of metadata quality is recognized as an important topic within the metadata research community, the cultural heritage sector has been slow to develop methodologies, guidelines and tools for addressing this topic in practice. This paper concentrates on metadata quality specifically within the museum sector and describes the potential of data-profiling techniques for metadata quality evaluation. A case study illustrates the application of a generalpurpose data-profiling tool on a large collection of metadata records from an ethnographic collection. After an analysis of the results of the case-study the paper reviews further steps in our research and presents the implementation of a metadata quality tool within an open-source collection management software.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008)
0.02
0.02071473 = product of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.029885992 = weight(_text_:management in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029885992 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032258198 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999)
0.02
0.019723749 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = product of:
0.11834249 = sum of:
0.11834249 = weight(_text_:management in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11834249 = score(doc=1915,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.02
0.017204374 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = product of:
0.10322624 = sum of:
0.10322624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10322624 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
Philips, J.T.: Metadata - information about electronic records (1995)
0.02
0.015939197 = product of:
0.047817588 = sum of:
0.047817588 = product of:
0.095635176 = sum of:
0.095635176 = weight(_text_:management in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095635176 = score(doc=4556,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a term to describe the information required to documents the characteristics of information contained within databases. Describes the elements that make up metadata. A number of software tools exist to help apply document management principles to electronic records but they have, so far, been inadequately applied. Describes 2 initiative currently under way to develop software to automate many records management functions. Understanding document management principles as applied to electronic records are vital to records managers
- Source
- Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.53-55
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.015053826 = product of:
0.04516148 = sum of:
0.04516148 = product of:
0.09032296 = sum of:
0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09032296 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
Chivers, A.; Feather, J.: ¬The management of digital data : a metadata approach (1998)
0.01
0.014088392 = product of:
0.042265177 = sum of:
0.042265177 = product of:
0.08453035 = sum of:
0.08453035 = weight(_text_:management in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453035 = score(doc=2363,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports on a research study, conducted at the Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, to investigate the potential of metadata for universal data management and explore the attitudes of UK information professionals to these issues
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.01
0.012165329 = product of:
0.036495987 = sum of:
0.036495987 = product of:
0.072991975 = sum of:
0.072991975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072991975 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.012165329 = product of:
0.036495987 = sum of:
0.036495987 = product of:
0.072991975 = sum of:
0.072991975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072991975 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Madsen, M.S.; Fogg, I.; Ruggles, C.: Metadata systems : integrative information technologies (1994)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=1055,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata systems are concerned with the management of data which describes other data (datasets, catalogues, or actual database management systems) and are presently the subject of intensive research. Metadata systems can be used to store richly detailed forms of information, perform seamless wide ranging searches of information distributed across networks, and to integrate information stored in disparate repositories. Describes a model design and methods of implementation derived from the experience of the Leicester University Metadata Project. The approach utilizes the incorporation of semantic metadata in addition to resource metadata, resulting in a generally more powerful system than existing global directory services. Feature of the class of design is flexibility or implementation, with the ability to provide a coherent metadata system functioning above heterogeneous autonomous distributed databases
-
Reed, B.: Metadata: core record or core business? (1997)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=1764,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Raises critical questions about the way archivists should be managing the metadata associated with records management and recordkeeping processes in order to maintain records in their context through time in complex and rapidly changing environments. Explores some current models for specifying record metadata, drawing on the outcomes of research projects and standards activities. Speculates on the potential value of defining a core set of record metadata. The mapping of the overlap between the metadata specified in the Pittsburgh University and British Columbia University projects, and the Australian Records Management Standards, reveals a possible core set of record metadada, analysis of which has shown that it would essentially enable the descriptions of the records as passive objects
-
Hood, A.; Eschedor Voelker, T.J.; Salem, J.A.: Using metadata to design a database-driven Website (2008)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=2972,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- After a review of the Kent State Libraries and Media Services Web site, a committee of librarians and staff gathered user feedback and developed a library-specific content management system (CMS) to make the move from a static HTML environment to database-driven design. This article focuses on the significant role of metadata in the CMS from the perspective of one of the site's architects and one of its content developers. This article includes figures and a biography for further reading. The work of the redesign was earlier described in a poster presentation for the 12th Annual ACRL conference.
- Theme
- Content Management System
-
Kleeck, D. Van; Langford, G.; Lundgren, J.; Nakano, H.; O'Dell, A.J.; Shelton, T.: Managing bibliographic data quality in a consortial academic library : a case study (2016)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 5133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=5133,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 5133, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5133)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article presents a case study of quality management for print and electronic resource metadata, summarizing problems and solutions encountered by the Cataloging and Discovery Services Department in the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida. The authors discuss national, state, and local standards for cataloging, automated and manual record enhancements for data, user feedback, and statewide consortial factors. Findings show that adherence to standards, proactive cleanup of data via manual processes and automated tools, collaboration with vendors and stakeholders, and continual assessment of workflows are key to the management of biblio-graphic data quality in consortial academic libraries.
-
Chilvers, A.: ¬The super-metadata framework for managing long-term access to digital data objects : a possible way forward with specific reference to the UK (2002)
0.01
0.008627344 = product of:
0.02588203 = sum of:
0.02588203 = product of:
0.05176406 = sum of:
0.05176406 = weight(_text_:management in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05176406 = score(doc=4468,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the reasons why existing management practices designed to cope with paper-based data objects appear to be inadequate for managing digital data objects (DDOs). The research described suggests the need for a reassessment of the way we view long-term access to DDOs. There is a need for a shift in emphasis which embraces the fluid nature of such objects and addresses the multifaceted issues involved in achieving such access. It would appear from the findings of this research that a conceptual framework needs to be developed which addresses a range of elements. The research achieved this by examining the issues facing stakeholders involved in this field; examining the need for and structure of a new generic conceptual framework, the super-metadata framework; identifying and discussing the issues central to the development of such a framework; and justifying the feasibility through the creation of an interactive cost model and stakeholder evaluation. The wider conceptual justification for such a framework is discussed and this involves an examination of the "public good" argument for the long-term retention of DDOs and the importance of selection in the management process. The paper concludes by considering the benefits to practitioners and the role they might play in testing the feasibility of such a framework. The paper also suggests possible avenues researchers may wish to consider to develop further the management of this field. (Note: This paper is derived from the author's Loughborough University phD thesis, "Managing long-term access to digital data objects: a metadata approach", written while holding a research studentship funded by the Department of Information Science.)
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
