-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.04
0.039634123 = product of:
0.11890237 = sum of:
0.11890237 = sum of:
0.080192536 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080192536 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038709838 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Hooland, S. van; Bontemps, Y.; Kaufman, S.: Answering the call for more accountability : applying data profiling to museum metadata (2008)
0.02
0.024857676 = product of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.03586319 = weight(_text_:management in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03586319 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038709838 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although the issue of metadata quality is recognized as an important topic within the metadata research community, the cultural heritage sector has been slow to develop methodologies, guidelines and tools for addressing this topic in practice. This paper concentrates on metadata quality specifically within the museum sector and describes the potential of data-profiling techniques for metadata quality evaluation. A case study illustrates the application of a generalpurpose data-profiling tool on a large collection of metadata records from an ethnographic collection. After an analysis of the results of the case-study the paper reviews further steps in our research and presents the implementation of a metadata quality tool within an open-source collection management software.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008)
0.02
0.02071473 = product of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.029885992 = weight(_text_:management in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029885992 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032258198 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.02
0.017204374 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = product of:
0.10322624 = sum of:
0.10322624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10322624 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.017204374 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = product of:
0.10322624 = sum of:
0.10322624 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10322624 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.015053826 = product of:
0.04516148 = sum of:
0.04516148 = product of:
0.09032296 = sum of:
0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09032296 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.015053826 = product of:
0.04516148 = sum of:
0.04516148 = product of:
0.09032296 = sum of:
0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09032296 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.015053826 = product of:
0.04516148 = sum of:
0.04516148 = product of:
0.09032296 = sum of:
0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09032296 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.01290328 = product of:
0.038709838 = sum of:
0.038709838 = product of:
0.077419676 = sum of:
0.077419676 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077419676 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.012165329 = product of:
0.036495987 = sum of:
0.036495987 = product of:
0.072991975 = sum of:
0.072991975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072991975 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Hood, A.; Eschedor Voelker, T.J.; Salem, J.A.: Using metadata to design a database-driven Website (2008)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=2972,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- After a review of the Kent State Libraries and Media Services Web site, a committee of librarians and staff gathered user feedback and developed a library-specific content management system (CMS) to make the move from a static HTML environment to database-driven design. This article focuses on the significant role of metadata in the CMS from the perspective of one of the site's architects and one of its content developers. This article includes figures and a biography for further reading. The work of the redesign was earlier described in a poster presentation for the 12th Annual ACRL conference.
- Theme
- Content Management System
-
Chilvers, A.: ¬The super-metadata framework for managing long-term access to digital data objects : a possible way forward with specific reference to the UK (2002)
0.01
0.008627344 = product of:
0.02588203 = sum of:
0.02588203 = product of:
0.05176406 = sum of:
0.05176406 = weight(_text_:management in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05176406 = score(doc=4468,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the reasons why existing management practices designed to cope with paper-based data objects appear to be inadequate for managing digital data objects (DDOs). The research described suggests the need for a reassessment of the way we view long-term access to DDOs. There is a need for a shift in emphasis which embraces the fluid nature of such objects and addresses the multifaceted issues involved in achieving such access. It would appear from the findings of this research that a conceptual framework needs to be developed which addresses a range of elements. The research achieved this by examining the issues facing stakeholders involved in this field; examining the need for and structure of a new generic conceptual framework, the super-metadata framework; identifying and discussing the issues central to the development of such a framework; and justifying the feasibility through the creation of an interactive cost model and stakeholder evaluation. The wider conceptual justification for such a framework is discussed and this involves an examination of the "public good" argument for the long-term retention of DDOs and the importance of selection in the management process. The paper concludes by considering the benefits to practitioners and the role they might play in testing the feasibility of such a framework. The paper also suggests possible avenues researchers may wish to consider to develop further the management of this field. (Note: This paper is derived from the author's Loughborough University phD thesis, "Managing long-term access to digital data objects: a metadata approach", written while holding a research studentship funded by the Department of Information Science.)
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.01
0.008602187 = product of:
0.02580656 = sum of:
0.02580656 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05161312 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
