-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.02
0.022454113 = product of:
0.03368117 = sum of:
0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009195981 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
- Type
- a
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.02
0.022454113 = product of:
0.03368117 = sum of:
0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009195981 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
- Type
- a
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.02
0.022454113 = product of:
0.03368117 = sum of:
0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009195981 = score(doc=1953,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
- Type
- a
-
Bueno-de-la-Fuente, G.; Hernández-Pérez, T.; Rodríguez-Mateos, D.; Méndez-Rodríguez, E.M.; Martín-Galán, B.: Study on the use of metadata for digital learning objects in University Institutional Repositories (MODERI) (2009)
0.02
0.022192208 = product of:
0.03328831 = sum of:
0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0056313644 = score(doc=2981,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
0.027656946 = product of:
0.055313893 = sum of:
0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055313893 = score(doc=2981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a core issue for the creation of repositories. Different institutional repositories have chosen and use different metadata models, elements and values for describing the range of digital objects they store. Thus, this paper analyzes the current use of metadata describing those Learning Objects that some open higher educational institutions' repositories include in their collections. The goal of this work is to identify and analyze the different metadata models being used to describe educational features of those specific digital educational objects (such as audience, type of educational material, learning objectives, etc.). Also discussed is the concept and typology of Learning Objects (LO) through their use in University Repositories. We will also examine the usefulness of specifically describing those learning objects, setting them apart from other kind of documents included in the repository, mainly scholarly publications and research results of the Higher Education institution.
- Type
- a
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.02
0.021869322 = product of:
0.032803982 = sum of:
0.011379444 = weight(_text_:a in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011379444 = score(doc=3383,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
White, H.C.; Carrier, S.; Thompson, A.; Greenberg, J.; Scherle, R.: ¬The Dryad Data Repository : a Singapore framework metadata architecture in a DSpace environment (2008)
0.02
0.021869322 = product of:
0.032803982 = sum of:
0.011379444 = weight(_text_:a in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011379444 = score(doc=2592,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This report presents recent metadata developments for Dryad, a digital repository hosting datasets underlying publications in the field of evolutionary biology. We review our efforts to bring the Dryad application profile into conformance with the Singapore Framework and discuss practical issues underlying the application profile implementation in a DSpace environment. The report concludes by outlining the next steps planned as Dryad moves into the next phase of development.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.02
0.021329116 = product of:
0.031993672 = sum of:
0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075084865 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
- Type
- a
-
Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997)
0.02
0.021329116 = product of:
0.031993672 = sum of:
0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075084865 = score(doc=903,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
- Type
- a
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.02
0.021329116 = product of:
0.031993672 = sum of:
0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075084865 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018)
0.02
0.021329116 = product of:
0.031993672 = sum of:
0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075084865 = score(doc=4826,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 18. 1.2019 19:13:22
- Type
- a
-
Liechti, O.; Sifer, M.J.; Ichikawa, T.: Structured graph format : XML metadata for describing Web site structure (1998)
0.02
0.021208337 = product of:
0.031812504 = sum of:
0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010387965 = score(doc=3597,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Warner, S.: E-prints and the Open Archives Initiative (2003)
0.02
0.021208337 = product of:
0.031812504 = sum of:
0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010387965 = score(doc=4772,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Open Archives Initiative (OAI) was created as a practical way to promote interoperability between e-print repositories. Although the scope of the OAI has been broadened, e-print repositories still represent a significant fraction of OAI data providers. This article presents a brief survey of OAI e-print repositories, and of services using metadata harvested from e-print repositories using the OAI protocol for metadata harvesting (OAI-PMH). It then discusses several situations where metadata harvesting may be used to further improve the utility of e-print archives as a component of the scholarly communication infrastructure.
- Date
- 18.12.2005 13:18:22
- Type
- a
-
Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998)
0.02
0.020477211 = product of:
0.030715816 = sum of:
0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009291277 = score(doc=5165,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
- Date
- 9. 9.2000 17:22:23
- Type
- a
-
Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998)
0.02
0.020477211 = product of:
0.030715816 = sum of:
0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009291277 = score(doc=57,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Conceptual Knowledge Markup Language (CKML), an application of XML, is a new standard being promoted for the specification of online conceptual knowledge (Kent and Shrivastava, 1998). CKML follows the philosophy of Conceptual Knowledge Processing (Wille, 1982), a principled approach to knowledge representation and data analysis, which advocates the development of methodologies and techniques to support people in their rational thinking, judgement and actions. CKML was developed and is being used in the WAVE networked information discovery and retrieval system (Kent and Neuss, 1994) as a standard for the specification of conceptual knowledge
- Date
- 30.12.2001 16:22:41
- Type
- a
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.02
0.020477211 = product of:
0.030715816 = sum of:
0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009291277 = score(doc=2837,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
- Type
- a
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.02
0.020477211 = product of:
0.030715816 = sum of:
0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009291277 = score(doc=4750,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata schema and standards are now a part of the information landscape. Librarianship has slowly realized that MARC is only one of a proliferation of metadata standards, and that MARC has many pros and cons related to its age, original conception, and biases. Should librarianship continue to promote the MARC standard? Are there better metadata standards out there that are more robust, user-friendly, and dynamic in the organization and presentation of information? This special issue examines current initiatives that are actively incorporating MARC standards and concepts into new metadata schemata, while also predicting a future where MARC may not be the metadata schema of choice for the organization and description of information.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
- Type
- a
-
Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000)
0.02
0.020477211 = product of:
0.030715816 = sum of:
0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009291277 = score(doc=180,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.02142454 = product of:
0.04284908 = sum of:
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004)
0.02
0.019862993 = product of:
0.029794488 = sum of:
0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053093014 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105
- Type
- a
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.02
0.019862993 = product of:
0.029794488 = sum of:
0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053093014 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
- Type
- a
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.02
0.019862993 = product of:
0.029794488 = sum of:
0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053093014 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
