Search (327 results, page 1 of 17)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012) 0.05
    0.050041467 = product of:
      0.08340244 = sum of:
        0.02767241 = weight(_text_:information in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02767241 = score(doc=2086,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.017301466 = weight(_text_:und in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017301466 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.038428567 = product of:
          0.076857135 = sum of:
            0.076857135 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076857135 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21059684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.36494914 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    An overview of the field of information organization that examines resource description as both a product and process of the contemporary digital environment. This timely book employs the unifying mechanism of the semantic web and the resource description framework to integrate the various traditions and practices of information and knowledge organization. Uniquely, it covers both the domain-specific traditions and practices and the practices of the 'metadata movement' through a single lens - that of resource description in the broadest, semantic web sense. This approach more readily accommodates coverage of the new Resource Description and Access (RDA) standard, which aims to move library cataloguing into the centre of the semantic web. The work surrounding RDA looks set to revolutionise the field of information organization, and this book will bring both the standard and its model and concepts into focus.
    BK
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
    Classification
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
    Content
    Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
    LCSH
    Libraries / information technology
    RSWK
    Information / Beschreibung (BVB)
    Subject
    Information / Beschreibung (BVB)
    Libraries / information technology
  2. Rannharter, N.; Teetor, S.: Maintaining an image data base : a use case based on the Digital Research Archive for Byzantium (DIFAB) (2017) 0.03
    0.031576604 = product of:
      0.07894151 = sum of:
        0.032827225 = weight(_text_:und in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032827225 = score(doc=3914,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.328536 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
        0.046114285 = product of:
          0.09222857 = sum of:
            0.09222857 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09222857 = score(doc=3914,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21059684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.437939 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Mit Metadaten versehene, digital archivierte Bilder sind aufgrund ihrer hohen Komplexität eine ständige Herausforderung für den Aufbau von Metadatenstrukturen und für das Beibehalten von adäquaten Metadatenstandards in Bilddatenbanken. Besonders bei Bildern über eine materielle Kultur zeichnet sich diese Komplexität in den diversen Ebenen ab. Zur Verdeutlichung dieser Problematik dient ein einzelnes Monument mit seiner fotographischen Dokumentation als geisteswissenschaftliches Anwendungsbeispiel aus dem Digitalen Forschungsarchiv Byzanz (DiFAB) der Universität Wien. Unter der grundsätzlichen Berücksichtigung der künftigen Anforderungen und der einfachen Navigation von Metadaten beinhaltet dieser Beitrag u. a. die Herausforderungen mit den diversen analogen und digitalen Formen der Dokumentation, der historischen Geographie, der kulturspezifischen Terminologie sowie mit der kunsthistorischen Bedeutung einer exakten und unscharfen Datierung für Forschungsarchive.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2017) H.2, S.208-224
  3. Gartner, R.: Metadata in the digital library : building an integrated strategy with XML (2021) 0.03
    0.03077303 = product of:
      0.05128838 = sum of:
        0.0065124077 = weight(_text_:information in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065124077 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.08228803 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
        0.01038088 = weight(_text_:und in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01038088 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.10389221 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
        0.034395095 = product of:
          0.06879019 = sum of:
            0.06879019 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06879019 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25721565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.2674417 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The range of metadata needed to run a digital library and preserve its collections in the long term is much more extensive and complicated than anything in its traditional counterpart. It includes the same 'descriptive' information which guides users to the resources they require but must supplement this with comprehensive 'administrative' metadata: this encompasses technical details of the files that make up its collections, the documentation of complex intellectual property rights and the extensive set needed to support its preservation in the long-term. To accommodate all of this requires the use of multiple metadata standards, all of which have to be brought together into a single integrated whole.
    Classification
    AN 73700: Digitale Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    Content
    Inhalt: 1 Introduction, Aims and Definitions -- 1.1 Origins -- 1.2 From information science to libraries -- 1.3 The central place of metadata -- 1.4 The book in outline -- 2 Metadata Basics -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Three types of metadata -- 2.2.1 Descriptive metadata -- 2.2.2 Administrative metadata -- 2.2.3 Structural metadata -- 2.3 The core components of metadata -- 2.3.1 Syntax -- 2.3.2 Semantics -- 2.3.3 Content rules -- 2.4 Metadata standards -- 2.5 Conclusion -- 3 Planning a Metadata Strategy: Basic Principles -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Principle 1: Support all stages of the digital curation lifecycle -- 3.3 Principle 2: Support the long-term preservation of the digital object -- 3.4 Principle 3: Ensure interoperability -- 3.5 Principle 4: Control metadata content wherever possible -- 3.6 Principle 5: Ensure software independence -- 3.7 Principle 6: Impose a logical system of identifiers -- 3.8 Principle 7: Use standards whenever possible -- 3.9 Principle 8: Ensure the integrity of the metadata itself -- 3.10 Summary: the basic principles of a metadata strategy -- 4 Planning a Metadata Strategy: Applying the Basic Principles -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Initial steps: standards as a foundation -- 4.2.1 'Off-the shelf' standards -- 4.2.2 Mapping out an architecture and serialising it into a standard -- 4.2.3 Devising a local metadata scheme -- 4.2.4 How standards support the basic principles -- 4.3 Identifiers: everything in its place -- 5 XML: The Syntactical Foundation of Metadata -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 What XML looks like -- 5.3 XML schemas -- 5.4 Namespaces -- 5.5 Creating and editing XML -- 5.6 Transforming XML -- 5.7 Why use XML? -- 6 METS: The Metadata Package -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Why use METS?.
    RVK
    AN 73700: Digitale Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
  4. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.03
    0.029259114 = product of:
      0.07314778 = sum of:
        0.030391235 = weight(_text_:information in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030391235 = score(doc=4407,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
        0.042756546 = product of:
          0.08551309 = sum of:
            0.08551309 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08551309 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Source
    Government information quarterly. 18(2001) S.155-165
  5. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.02
    0.019922668 = product of:
      0.04980667 = sum of:
        0.028428398 = weight(_text_:information in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028428398 = score(doc=4866,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.021378273 = product of:
          0.042756546 = sum of:
            0.042756546 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042756546 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.40-45
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  6. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.018356113 = product of:
      0.045890283 = sum of:
        0.015349891 = weight(_text_:information in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015349891 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
        0.030540392 = product of:
          0.061080784 = sum of:
            0.061080784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061080784 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  7. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.02
    0.018356113 = product of:
      0.045890283 = sum of:
        0.015349891 = weight(_text_:information in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015349891 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
        0.030540392 = product of:
          0.061080784 = sum of:
            0.061080784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061080784 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  8. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.02
    0.018356113 = product of:
      0.045890283 = sum of:
        0.015349891 = weight(_text_:information in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015349891 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
        0.030540392 = product of:
          0.061080784 = sum of:
            0.061080784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061080784 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  9. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.02
    0.0182807 = product of:
      0.04570175 = sum of:
        0.021269435 = weight(_text_:information in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021269435 = score(doc=4867,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.024432313 = product of:
          0.048864625 = sum of:
            0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048864625 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  10. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.02
    0.0182807 = product of:
      0.04570175 = sum of:
        0.021269435 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021269435 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
        0.024432313 = product of:
          0.048864625 = sum of:
            0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048864625 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  11. Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998) 0.02
    0.018161861 = product of:
      0.045404654 = sum of:
        0.02402638 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02402638 = score(doc=5165,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
        0.021378273 = product of:
          0.042756546 = sum of:
            0.042756546 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042756546 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
    Date
    9. 9.2000 17:22:23
  12. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.02
    0.016719494 = product of:
      0.041798733 = sum of:
        0.01736642 = weight(_text_:information in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01736642 = score(doc=2686,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
        0.024432313 = product of:
          0.048864625 = sum of:
            0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048864625 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : National Information Standards Organization
  13. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.02
    0.016719494 = product of:
      0.041798733 = sum of:
        0.01736642 = weight(_text_:information in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01736642 = score(doc=4826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
        0.024432313 = product of:
          0.048864625 = sum of:
            0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048864625 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  14. Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004) 0.02
    0.015995612 = product of:
      0.039989028 = sum of:
        0.018610755 = weight(_text_:information in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018610755 = score(doc=4750,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
        0.021378273 = product of:
          0.042756546 = sum of:
            0.042756546 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042756546 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata schema and standards are now a part of the information landscape. Librarianship has slowly realized that MARC is only one of a proliferation of metadata standards, and that MARC has many pros and cons related to its age, original conception, and biases. Should librarianship continue to promote the MARC standard? Are there better metadata standards out there that are more robust, user-friendly, and dynamic in the organization and presentation of information? This special issue examines current initiatives that are actively incorporating MARC standards and concepts into new metadata schemata, while also predicting a future where MARC may not be the metadata schema of choice for the organization and description of information.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
  15. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.02
    0.015995612 = product of:
      0.039989028 = sum of:
        0.018610755 = weight(_text_:information in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018610755 = score(doc=3283,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
        0.021378273 = product of:
          0.042756546 = sum of:
            0.042756546 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042756546 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
  16. Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005) 0.01
    0.014896169 = product of:
      0.037240423 = sum of:
        0.02255964 = weight(_text_:information in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255964 = score(doc=4729,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
        0.014680781 = weight(_text_:und in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014680781 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The task of an information architect is to create web sites where users can actually find the information they are looking for. As the ocean of information rises and leaves what we seek ever more deeply buried in what we don't seek, this discipline becomes ever more relevant. Information architecture involves many different aspects of web site creation and organization, but its principal tools are information organization techniques developed in other disciplines. Most of these techniques come from library science, such as thesauri, taxonomies, and faceted classification. Topic maps are a relative newcomer to this area and bring with them the promise of better-organized web sites, compared to what is possible with existing techniques. However, it is not generally understood how topic maps relate to the traditional techniques, and what advantages and disadvantages they have, compared to these techniques. The aim of this paper is to help build a better understanding of these issues.
    Source
    Journal of information science. 30(2005) no.4, S.378-391
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  17. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.01
    0.01468489 = product of:
      0.036712226 = sum of:
        0.012279914 = weight(_text_:information in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012279914 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
        0.024432313 = product of:
          0.048864625 = sum of:
            0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048864625 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  18. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.01
    0.01468489 = product of:
      0.036712226 = sum of:
        0.012279914 = weight(_text_:information in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012279914 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.024432313 = product of:
          0.048864625 = sum of:
            0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048864625 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.01
    0.01468489 = product of:
      0.036712226 = sum of:
        0.012279914 = weight(_text_:information in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012279914 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
        0.024432313 = product of:
          0.048864625 = sum of:
            0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048864625 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
  20. Liechti, O.; Sifer, M.J.; Ichikawa, T.: Structured graph format : XML metadata for describing Web site structure (1998) 0.01
    0.014629557 = product of:
      0.03657389 = sum of:
        0.015195617 = weight(_text_:information in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015195617 = score(doc=3597,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
        0.021378273 = product of:
          0.042756546 = sum of:
            0.042756546 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042756546 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045082662 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 287
  • el 35
  • m 21
  • s 14
  • n 4
  • b 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects