Search (137 results, page 7 of 7)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Clavel-Merrin, G.: MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects): a virtual authority file across languages (2004) 0.00
    0.0012665315 = product of:
      0.0063326578 = sum of:
        0.0063326578 = weight(_text_:a in 5680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063326578 = score(doc=5680,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5680, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5680)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Shared authority files and cooperation in the development of national lists, both author and subject, have enabled libraries to share resources and improve access to their collections. As we move from national resource sharing to a more international approach, we face problems accessing catalogues in other languages. By creating links between existing subject heading languages (initially in French, German, and English), MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects) allows users to carry out searches in major national library collections in Europe using subject headings in their own languages. An operational service will be available in 2004.
    Type
    a
  2. Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022) 0.00
    0.0012665315 = product of:
      0.0063326578 = sum of:
        0.0063326578 = weight(_text_:a in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063326578 = score(doc=1141,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records can include information from controlled vocabularies to capture identities about individuals, especially about authors or intended audiences; personal name authority records can also contain information about identity. Employing a systematic analysis of the overlap of the Homosaurus, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), this article explores the extent to which LGBTQ+ identities are represented in the three vocabularies. Despite LCSH's long, iterative history of development and the faceted, post-coordinate nature of LCDGT, neither vocabulary was found to be adequate in covering the complex, LGBTQ+ identities represented in the Homosaurus.
    Type
    a
  3. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control on the Web (2001) 0.00
    0.0012535411 = product of:
      0.0062677055 = sum of:
        0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062677055 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.00
    0.0012535411 = product of:
      0.0062677055 = sum of:
        0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062677055 = score(doc=5682,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
    Type
    a
  5. Ansorge, K.: Das was 2007 (2007) 0.00
    0.0012030456 = product of:
      0.003007614 = sum of:
        0.0011609735 = weight(_text_:s in 2405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011609735 = score(doc=2405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.030030979 = fieldWeight in 2405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2405)
        0.0018466405 = weight(_text_:a in 2405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0018466405 = score(doc=2405,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.045040898 = fieldWeight in 2405, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2405)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    "DDC-Deutsch - Bereits im Jahr 2006 wurde die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) für die inhaltliche Erschließung der in den Reihen B (Monografien und Periodika außerhalb des Verlagsbuchhandels) und H (Hochschulschriften) der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie angezeigten Publikationen eingeführt. Mit Heft 1/2007 hat die DDC auch in der Reihe A (Monografien und Periodika des Verlagsbuchhandels) Einzug gehalten. Die dort angezeigten Publikationen werden zusätzlich wie bisher vollständig mit RSWK Schlagwortketten erschlossen. Die DNB wird damit zum größten europäischen Lieferanten von Dewey-Notationen und nimmt nach der LoC weltweit die zweite Stelle ein. Durch die Integration der Daten der DNB in den WorldCat werden Sichtbarkeit und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten dieses Angebots auch über den deutschsprachigen Raum hinaus verbessert. Um den Informationsaustausch unter den europäischen DDC-Anwendern zu verbessern, europäische Belange in der Klassifikation stärker durchzusetzen und die Verbreitung in Europa gemeinsam mit OCLC zu koordinieren, wurde die EDUG (European DDC Users' Group) gegründet."
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 20(2008) H.1, S.7-13
    Type
    a
  6. Memer, G.: ¬The German Name Authority File (PND) in the Bavarian Union Catalogue : principles, experiences, and costs (2004) 0.00
    0.0011818499 = product of:
      0.005909249 = sum of:
        0.005909249 = weight(_text_:a in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005909249 = score(doc=5557,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper gives a short overview of the library situation in the Bavarian Library Network and the authority files used in German libraries. It deals with the implementation of the authority file for personal names into the Bavarian Union Catalogue and the experiences in using it. Finally, it looks into costs and benefits of the use of authority files in the Bavarian Network Catalogue.
    Type
    a
  7. WissKI - SPARQL endpoints for authority files : an experimental service provided by the WissKI project (2011) 0.00
    0.0011818499 = product of:
      0.005909249 = sum of:
        0.005909249 = weight(_text_:a in 4433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005909249 = score(doc=4433,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4433, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4433)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This service is a spin-off of WissKI, a project funded by the German Research Foundation 2009-2011. It is an experimental service only. It might be inaccessible, broken or flawed without any notice. We take no responsibility for the reliability of the service or the data. Do not use in production environments!
  8. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.00
    0.0010855984 = product of:
      0.005427992 = sum of:
        0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005427992 = score(doc=310,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Type
    a
  9. Petrucciani, A.: ¬The other half of cataloguing : new models and perspectives for the control of authors and works (2004) 0.00
    0.0010446175 = product of:
      0.0052230875 = sum of:
        0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052230875 = score(doc=5669,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Today's electronic catalogue makes retrieval of specific records very simple and quick in most (not all) cases, but searches aimed at the reliable retrieval of all material answering a well-defined need (author, work, theme, form, etc.) are still long and tiring, and sometimes impossible, in crowded bibliographic databases. In spite of its great relevance, authority control has been and still is the "poor relative" of cataloguing, the often neglected or overlooked "other half" if we compare it to the creation of bibliographic records. The FRBR study and the new authority control standards (GARR and UNIMARC Authorities) are important steps towards future perspectives. Even today, cataloguing codes do not make clear the difference between the access points for bibliographic records and the relationships (work-to-work, author-to-work, etc.) that are independent from spoecific publications. With the development of richer authority records and relationships, the bibliographic record might be relieved of information related to entities different from publications and of all the functions more suitably worked out upstream or downstream in access systems or by links to the images and/or the texts of the publications themselves. A "light" bibliographic record would no longer be the paramount component of library information systems; it would keep its central role rather as nimble, swift turntable between access and content organization systems and systems for management and display of digital resources themselves.
    Type
    a
  10. Plassard, M.-F.: IFLA and authority control (2004) 0.00
    8.35694E-4 = product of:
      0.00417847 = sum of:
        0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00417847 = score(doc=293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Zhu, L.: OCLC's MARS and innovative's millenium : authority control procedures (2004) 0.00
    8.35694E-4 = product of:
      0.00417847 = sum of:
        0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00417847 = score(doc=5694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  12. Patton, G.E.: From FRBR to FRAD : extending the Model (2009) 0.00
    8.35694E-4 = product of:
      0.00417847 = sum of:
        0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00417847 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A report on the completion of the work of the IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records which was charged by the IFLA Division of Bibliographic Control to extend the FRBR model to authority data.
  13. Dobreski, B.: Authority and universalism : conventional values in descriptive catalog codes (2017) 0.00
    8.35694E-4 = product of:
      0.00417847 = sum of:
        0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00417847 = score(doc=3876,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Every standard embodies a particular set of values. Some aspects are privileged while others are masked. Values embedded within knowledge organization standards have special import in that they are further perpetuated by the data they are used to generate. Within libraries, descriptive catalog codes serve as prominent knowledge organization standards, guiding the creation of resource representations. Though the historical and functional aspects of these standards have received significant attention, less focus has been placed on the values associated with such codes. In this study, a critical, historical analysis of ten Anglo-American descriptive catalog codes and surrounding discourse was conducted as an initial step towards uncovering key values associated with this lineage of standards. Two values in particular were found to be highly significant: authority and universalism. Authority is closely tied to notions of power and control, particularly over practice or belief. Increasing control over resources, identities, and viewpoints are all manifestations of the value of authority within descriptive codes. Universalism has guided the widening coverage of descriptive codes in regards to settings and materials, such as the extension of bibliographic standards to non-book resources. Together, authority and universalism represent conventional values focused on facilitating orderly social exchanges. A comparative lack of emphasis on values concerning human welfare and empowerment may be unsurprising, but raises questions concerning the role of human values in knowledge organization standards. Further attention to the values associated with descriptive codes and other knowledge organization standards is important as libraries and other institutions seek to share their resource representation data more widely
    Type
    a
  14. Boddaert, N.: French Official Corporate Bodies of the Ancient Regime (COPAR) and Religious Corporate Bodies (CORELI) : two operations in creating authority records in order to standardise the entries of bibliographic records in Bibliothèque Nationale de France retrospective conversion (2004) 0.00
    7.386562E-4 = product of:
      0.003693281 = sum of:
        0.003693281 = weight(_text_:a in 5691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003693281 = score(doc=5691,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 5691, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5691)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    During the retrospective conversion of its printed and card catalogues, the Bibliothèque nationale de France was confronted with the existence of old bibliographic records without corporate body headings, because this concept was unknown when the books were catalogued. The Library launched two programs aimed at creating authority records for specific fields important for the access to the national bibliographic heritage, respectively named COFAR -- for the official corporate bodies, mainly national and preceding the French Revolution - and CORELI - for the religious corporate bodies (parishes, dioceses, confraternities, orders and congregations, etc.). The 2550 records created by the COFAR and CORELI programs have been included in the authority file of BNOPALE PLUS; so they are visible either via the online catalogue or separately with other authority records. They give librarians an extra tool for identifying entities. They represent also a valuable source of information accessible to anyone who takes an interest in the history of French government institutions or religious entities.
    Type
    a
  15. Salo, D.: Name authority control in institutional repositories (2009) 0.00
    7.312323E-4 = product of:
      0.0036561615 = sum of:
        0.0036561615 = weight(_text_:a in 2976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036561615 = score(doc=2976,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2976, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2976)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  16. Gorman, M.: Authority control in the context of bibliographic control in the electronic environment (2004) 0.00
    6.2677055E-4 = product of:
      0.0031338527 = sum of:
        0.0031338527 = weight(_text_:a in 5662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031338527 = score(doc=5662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5662)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004) 0.00
    6.2677055E-4 = product of:
      0.0031338527 = sum of:
        0.0031338527 = weight(_text_:a in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031338527 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 129
  • el 12
  • b 2
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…