Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × type_ss:"m"
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Testing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1995) 0.03
    0.030111905 = product of:
      0.09033571 = sum of:
        0.09033571 = weight(_text_:resources in 385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09033571 = score(doc=385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.483971 = fieldWeight in 385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=385)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
  2. Drabenstott, K.M.: Enhancing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1994) 0.03
    0.025093256 = product of:
      0.075279765 = sum of:
        0.075279765 = weight(_text_:resources in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075279765 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.40330917 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science research 18(1996) no.1, S.87-89 (C.A. Hert), Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
  3. Matthews, J.R.; Lawrence, G.S.; Ferguson, D.K.: Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey, a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.02
    0.017565278 = product of:
      0.052695833 = sum of:
        0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052695833 = score(doc=4168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000) 0.02
    0.015570745 = product of:
      0.046712235 = sum of:
        0.046712235 = sum of:
          0.022464553 = weight(_text_:management in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022464553 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.13034125 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.02424768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02424768 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 28(2001) no.2, S.97-100 (S. Betrand-Gastaldy); Information processing and management 37(2001) no.5, S.766-767 (H. Borko); JASIST 23(2002) no.1, S.58-60 (A.T.D. Petrou); Library and information science research 23(2001) S.200-202 (D.J. Karpuk)
  5. Guidelines for Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) Displays : Final Report May 2005. Recommended by the IFLA Task Force on Guidelines for OPACD Displays. Approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section (2005) 0.01
    0.012546628 = product of:
      0.037639882 = sum of:
        0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037639882 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Existing Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) demonstrate differences in the range and complexity of their functional features, terminology, and help facilities. Many libraries already have OPACs and many of them have a need for guidelines that help them to design or redesign the displays for their OPACs, taking their users' needs into account. This book provides such guidelines, recommendations and a corpus of good practice to assist libraries in this process. The audience for these guidelines is librarians charged with customising OPAC software and vendors and producers of this software. The guidelines are mainly designed for general libraries with collections of resources in the humanities, the social sciences, and the pure and applied sciences. They are intended to apply to any type of catalogue, independently of the kind of interface and technology used. This is the Final Report of a Task Force an the matter, which was approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section.