Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Seeliger, F.: ¬A tool for systematic visualization of controlled descriptors and their relation to others as a rich context for a discovery system (2015) 0.02
    0.016983882 = product of:
      0.033967763 = sum of:
        0.023722902 = weight(_text_:management in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023722902 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
        0.010244861 = product of:
          0.020489722 = sum of:
            0.020489722 = weight(_text_:science in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020489722 = score(doc=2547,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.16463245 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery service (a search engine and service called WILBERT) used at our library at the Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau (TUAS Wildau) is comprised of more than 8 million items. If we were to record all licensed publications in this tool to a higher level of articles, including their bibliographic records and full texts, we would have a holding estimated at a hundred million documents. A lot of features, such as ranking, autocompletion, multi-faceted classification, refining opportunities reduce the number of hits. However, it is not enough to give intuitive support for a systematic overview of topics related to documents in the library. John Naisbitt once said: "We are drowning in information, but starving for knowledge." This quote is still very true today. Two years ago, we started to develop micro thesauri for MINT topics in order to develop an advanced indexing of the library stock. We use iQvoc as a vocabulary management system to create the thesaurus. It provides an easy-to-use browser interface that builds a SKOS thesaurus in the background. The purpose of this is to integrate the thesauri in WILBERT in order to offer a better subject-related search. This approach especially supports first-year students by giving them the possibility to browse through a hierarchical alignment of a subject, for instance, logistics or computer science, and thereby discover how the terms are related. It also supports the students with an insight into established abbreviations and alternative labels. Students at the TUAS Wildau were involved in the developmental process of the software regarding the interface and functionality of iQvoc. The first steps have been taken and involve the inclusion of 3000 terms in our discovery tool WILBERT.
    Content
    Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2015 - Cape Town, South Africa in Session 141 - Science and Technology.
  2. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.02
    0.015035374 = product of:
      0.060141496 = sum of:
        0.060141496 = sum of:
          0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021732632 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
          0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038408864 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Rieh, S.Y.; Kim, Y.-M.; Markey, K.: Amount of invested mental effort (AIME) in online searching (2012) 0.01
    0.007413407 = product of:
      0.029653627 = sum of:
        0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029653627 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 48(2012) no.6, S.1136-1150
  4. Rodríguez Bravo, B.; Travieso Rodríguez, C.; Simões, M.G. de M.; Freitas, M.C.V. de: Evaluating discovery tools in Portuguese and Spanish academic libraries (2014) 0.00
    0.004801108 = product of:
      0.019204432 = sum of:
        0.019204432 = product of:
          0.038408864 = sum of:
            0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038408864 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Wilson, V.: Catalog users "in the wild" : the potential of an ethnographic approach to studies of library catalogs and their users (2015) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 2016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=2016,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2016, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2016)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    An increasing number of library user studies are employing ethnographic techniques as an alternative to more traditional qualitative methods such as surveys. Such techniques, however, are only beginning to see significant application to catalog user studies. Beginning with a discussion of the applied ethnographic method and its current usage within the field of Library and Information Science research, this article will assess methods that have traditionally been applied to studies of catalog users and present the case for the potential of an ethnographic approach for future catalog evaluation and design.
  6. Willson, R.; Given, L.M.: ¬The effect of spelling and retrieval system familiarity on search behavior in online public access catalogs : a mixed methods study (2010) 0.00
    0.0022638158 = product of:
      0.009055263 = sum of:
        0.009055263 = product of:
          0.018110527 = sum of:
            0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018110527 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2461-2476
  7. Kules, B.; Capra, R.: Influence of training and stage of search on gaze behavior in a library catalog faceted search interface (2012) 0.00
    0.0022638158 = product of:
      0.009055263 = sum of:
        0.009055263 = product of:
          0.018110527 = sum of:
            0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018110527 = score(doc=4129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.114-138
  8. Ramdeen, S.; Hemminger, B.M.: ¬A tale of two interfaces : how facets affect the library catalog search (2012) 0.00
    0.0022638158 = product of:
      0.009055263 = sum of:
        0.009055263 = product of:
          0.018110527 = sum of:
            0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018110527 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.702-715