-
Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997)
0.04
0.038344346 = product of:
0.07668869 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066389285 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
-
Yee, M.M.: System design and cataloging meet the user : user interfaces to online public access catalogs (1991)
0.04
0.038344346 = product of:
0.07668869 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066389285 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Current research on user interfaces to online public access catalogs is reviewed in an attempt to identify research methods and findings applicable to the design of effective user interfaces to online public access catalogs. A broad definition of user interface is employed which includes data structures, in addition to searching and indexing software. The following features of online public access catalogs are discussed: the demonstration of relationships between records, the provision of entry vocabularies, the arrangement of multiple entries on the screen, the provision of access points, the display of single records, and the division of the catalog into separate files or indexes. For each feature, user studies and other research on online public access catalogs are reviewed and those findings summarized which provide insight into user needs concerning that particular feature; issues are identified and directions for further research are suggested. Implications for cataloging codes and standards and system design are discussed
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.78-98
-
Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994)
0.04
0.038329873 = product of:
0.1533195 = sum of:
0.1533195 = weight(_text_:standards in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1533195 = score(doc=10,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.68232906 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
-
Stewart, M.R.: Users, standards, and access : in search of the standard user (1992)
0.03
0.03353864 = product of:
0.13415456 = sum of:
0.13415456 = weight(_text_:standards in 2725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13415456 = score(doc=2725,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5970379 = fieldWeight in 2725, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2725)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Standards for user interfaces for access to bibliographic data bases cannot be developed without more complete understanding of the current user, user attitude and capabilities. Gives 3 means of achieving this based on observing the user. 45% of access points in subject searches results in no retrievals. Errors in searching on-line catalogues occur with a 40% no hit title search rate and a 51% no hit author search rate when those records were on the data base. Stresses the importance of fundamental user interface components contained in the IBM staff publication systems guide. Concludes that although there is no such thing as a standard user it is still vital to develop user standards
-
Fattahi, R.: ¬A comparison between the online catalogue and the card catalogue : some considerations for redesigning bibliographic standards (1995)
0.03
0.027384182 = product of:
0.10953673 = sum of:
0.10953673 = weight(_text_:standards in 3828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10953673 = score(doc=3828,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.4874794 = fieldWeight in 3828, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3828)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Suggests that an appropriate approach in comparing online and card catalogues is to compare the 2 in relation to the processes in which bibliographic records are created (the input stage), manipulated (the storage stage) and retrieved (the output stage). Studies the concepts underlying these processes and reveals major differences between online and card catalogues. These differences are multiplied and widened when moving from input to output to such an extent that online catalogues can be considered as a significant departure from manual catalogues. The redesign for use in an online environment of bibliographical standards which are based on the card catalogue should be based on conceptual as well as practical differences between the online and card catalogues
-
Marco, J.G.: Hypertext and indexing languages : common challenges and perspectives (1996)
0.03
0.026893519 = product of:
0.053787038 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=5161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5161)
0.040054493 = product of:
0.080108985 = sum of:
0.080108985 = weight(_text_:organization in 5161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080108985 = score(doc=5161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.44566956 = fieldWeight in 5161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5161)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Conceptual considerations on possible synergies between hypertext and indexing languages' research. The existence of a common conceptual and theoretical background encourages and facilitates cooperation. It is concluded that the conjunction of the almost biological flexibility of the hypertext and the logical and conceptual consistency of indexing languages is a promise of better and more effective information management systems in the future
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
- Source
- Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
-
Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages (2006)
0.03
0.026020419 = product of:
0.052040838 = sum of:
0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01699316 = score(doc=232,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.03504768 = product of:
0.07009536 = sum of:
0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07009536 = score(doc=232,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.10
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Walker, S.: ¬The Okapi online catalogue research projects (1989)
0.03
0.025659401 = product of:
0.051318802 = sum of:
0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017165681 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.03415312 = product of:
0.06830624 = sum of:
0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06830624 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 11:22:08
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.424-435.
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A framework for indexing and representation of information based on work domain analysis : a fiction classification example (1994)
0.02
0.023939986 = product of:
0.04787997 = sum of:
0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017839102 = score(doc=5838,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
0.030040871 = product of:
0.060081743 = sum of:
0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060081743 = score(doc=5838,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Information retrieval and exploration of work domains through databases and integrated information systems has become increasingly important in many modern work settings (as well as in libraries). The problem space of the users is defined on occasion by the dynamically changing requirements from their tasks and goals. it is argued that IR system design should be based on an analysis of the properties of the work domain, the task situation and the user characteristics. The paper describes a general framework for IR system design that has been used in the design of a library system. A special problem identified from use of the framework in domain analysis of fiction retrieval is treated in more detail: mapping the authors' domain structures to the domain structures expressed in users' needs in indexing and representation of fiction
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.4
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
-
Fattahi, R.: ¬A comparison between the online catalogue and the card catalogue : some considerations for redesigning bibliographic standards (1995)
0.02
0.023472156 = product of:
0.093888626 = sum of:
0.093888626 = weight(_text_:standards in 6431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093888626 = score(doc=6431,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.41783947 = fieldWeight in 6431, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6431)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Online catalogues and card catalogues can be compared from different perspectives and according to different criteria. Compares the 2 types of catalogue according to the processes in which bibliographic records are created (input stage), manipulated (storage stage) and retrieval (output stage). The concepts underlying these stages are studied, revealing major differences between online and card catalogues, which are multiplied and widened when moving from input and output stage to such an extent that online catalogues can be considered as a significant departure from manual catalogues. The redesign for use in the online environment of bibliographic standards (cataloguing codes, MARC formats and ISBDs) which have been based on the concept of the card catalogue should instead be based on the conceptual as well as the practical differences between the online and the card catalogue
-
Goldberg, T.; Neagle, E.: Serials information in the OPAC : a model for shared responsibility (1996)
0.02
0.023371622 = product of:
0.046743244 = sum of:
0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019420752 = score(doc=662,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Two departments at Louisville University, Kentucky, one in public services and the other in technical services, share responsibility for creating and maintaing serials information in the NOTIS order/pay/receipt (OPR) record. Explains the various notes kept in OPR statements, as well as the benefits of this cooperative effort to usrs and staff
- Source
- Serials review. 22(1996) no.4, S.55-63
-
Sharma, A.: ¬The Z39.50 information retrieval protocol (1998)
0.02
0.023371622 = product of:
0.046743244 = sum of:
0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019420752 = score(doc=1406,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of the work of a new member of the ELINOR project team to review the development taking place in Z39.50 networked information retrieval protocol with a view to bringing the University's electronic library pilot systems, including ELINOR and the online catalogue into a single, unified system. Focuses particularly on the WWW client server environment
- Series
- British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
-
Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996)
0.02
0.022359734 = product of:
0.04471947 = sum of:
0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020812286 = score(doc=6958,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.023907183 = product of:
0.047814365 = sum of:
0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814365 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Wrigth, C.; Friend, L.: Ergonomics for online searching (1992)
0.02
0.022129761 = product of:
0.088519044 = sum of:
0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088519044 = score(doc=2350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Summarises some of the recommendations, made by standards and other bodies, regarding the ergonomics of on-line searching and the planning and design of on-line terminals and workstations. Factors included in the planning process are: physical arrangement of equipment and seating; lighting; screen glare; individual vision factors (corrective lenses, viewing distance, placement of documentation, adjustable screens, blink rates); acoustic factors; radiation; screen flickers; screen image characteristics (colour, positive/negative images, screen size, scrolling); statue. Furniture and equipment configurations are discussed in considerable detail
-
Massicotte, M.: Improved browsable displays for online subject access (1988)
0.02
0.021027675 = product of:
0.04205535 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.028322803 = product of:
0.056645606 = sum of:
0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056645606 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A browsable display under a specific search term can often frustrate users if the display is carried over several screens. This article investigates methods of compressing headings identified by MARC subfield codes to reduce the size of browsable displays. Arguments are presented that a more efficient system design can be achieved by machine sorting of subdivisions via a conceptual, rather than alphabetical, approach. The author concludes that system architecture for browsable subject index displays must be redesigned to relieve the user of the burden of data organization
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 7(1988), S.373-380
-
Cherry, J.M.; Clinton, M.: ¬An experimental investigation of two types of instruction for OPAC users (1991)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22
-
Seruga, J.: Object-oriented modeling of a library information system (1997)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- LASIE. 28(1997) no.4, S.22-34
-
Sandlian, P.: Rethinking the rules (1995)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Rules regarding cataloguing, subject headings, the way information in bibliographic records is organised and the catalogue's interface, or the way the screen is set up, are barriers to the use of online catalogues by children Describes the background to and implementation of a project to create a child orientation catalogue with a graphical user interface, or one that relies on pictures instead of text, within Denver Public Library in Colorado. Now called the Kid's catalog and commercially available from the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries Co., the catalogue's software acts as a front end to a library's regular catalogue
- Source
- School library journal. 41(1995) no.7, S.22-25
-
Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
-
Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Searching behaviour and the evaluation of online catalogues (1991)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a brief report on a study, carried out by the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, to investigate the techniques used for evaluating OPACs: to explore and assess different data gathering methods in studying information seeking behaviour at the on-line catalogue; and to examine how a transaction logging facility could be enhanced to serve as a more effective diagnostic tool. For a full report see British Library research paper 78
- Pages
- S.20-22
