Search (117 results, page 6 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Mealia, A.; Jenkins, C.: COPAC service (1997) 0.01 
    0.0059021143 = product of:
  0.011804229 = sum of:
    0.011804229 = product of:
      0.035412684 = sum of:
        0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035412684 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Zeitlyn, D.; Bex, J.; David, M.: Making sense of online information (1997) 0.01 
    0.0059021143 = product of:
  0.011804229 = sum of:
    0.011804229 = product of:
      0.035412684 = sum of:
        0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 1098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035412684 = score(doc=1098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1098)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Electronic library and visual information research: Proceedings of the 4th ELVIRA Conference (ELVIRA 4), Electronic Library and Visual Information Research, De Montfort University, Milton Keynes, May 1997. Ed. by C. Davies u. A. Ramsden
  3. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : records clustering for works of fiction (2000) 0.01 
    0.0059021143 = product of:
  0.011804229 = sum of:
    0.011804229 = product of:
      0.035412684 = sum of:
        0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035412684 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  4. De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Cellentani, D.; Hawk, J.; Jenkins, L.; Wilson, A.: Perceptions of libraries and information resources : A Report to the OCLC Membership (2005) 0.01 
    0.0059021143 = product of:
  0.011804229 = sum of:
    0.011804229 = product of:
      0.035412684 = sum of:
        0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035412684 = score(doc=5018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Whitney , C.; Schiff, L.: ¬The Melvyl Recommender Project : developing library recommendation services (2006) 0.01 
    0.0059021143 = product of:
  0.011804229 = sum of:
    0.011804229 = product of:
      0.035412684 = sum of:
        0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035412684 = score(doc=1173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Gödert, W.; Horny, S.: ¬The design of subject access elements in Online Public Access Catalogs (1990) 0.01 
    0.0059021143 = product of:
  0.011804229 = sum of:
    0.011804229 = product of:
      0.035412684 = sum of:
        0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035412684 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Experiences with retrieval in OPACs suggest that there are major problems for the users of such systems, such as choosing the 'correct' subject access vocabulary, narrowing or broadening the set of items retrieved regarding the search interest. Such problems relate to two facts: (1) that in the early OPACs subject access has not been considered seriously enough and (2) that the complexity of the topic has not been really recognized. Using a typology of users' questions it is demonstrated which requirements musts be met by a successful online subject access. Improvements of subject access tools are primarily aimed at, pinpointing the interplay between the different subcomponents of any subject facility: a) the features of the indexing languages used; b) the indexing principles used; c) the design and structuring of the database; and d) the possibilities of the technical retrieval facility, the search mode, and query languages. The contribution summarizes the manifold interactions between the four subcomponents listed. Any successful retrieval will heavily depend on the design of these components considering their interactions.
  7. Enhancing access to information : designing catalogs for the 21st century (1992) 0.01 
    0.0058314553 = product of:
  0.011662911 = sum of:
    0.011662911 = product of:
      0.03498873 = sum of:
        0.03498873 = weight(_text_:g in 1009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03498873 = score(doc=1009,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 1009, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1009)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: TYCKOSON, D.A.: Enhancing access to information: building catalogs for the future; TYCKOSON, D.A.: The twenty-first century limited: desinging catalogs for the next century; DWYER, J.: Bibliographic records enhancement: from the drawing board to the catalog screen; SYRACUSE, R.O. u. R.K. POYER: Enhancing access to the library's collections: a view from an academic health center library; STUDWELL, W.E.: Of eggs and baskets: getting more access out of LC Subject Headings in an online environment; STEPHENS, I.E.: Getting more out of call numbers: displaying holdings, locations and circulation status; MICCO, M.: The next generation of online public access catalogs: a new look at subject access using hypermedia; SLOAN, B.G.: Remote access: design implications for the online catalog; ENGEL, G.: User instruction for access to catalogs and database on the Internet; BARNES, S. u. J. McCUE: Linking library records to bibliographic databases: an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola and the OPAC; HARWOOD, R.: Adding a nonlibrary campus collection to the library database; CARTER, K., H. OLSEN u. S. AQUILA: Bulk loading of records for microform sets into the online catalogue; DYKEMAN, A. u. J. ZIMMERMAN: The Georgia Institute of Technology Electronic Library: issues to consider; MOLHOLT, P. u. K. FORSYTHE: Opening up information access through the electronic catalog
  8. Craven, J.; Johnson, F.; Butters, G.: ¬The usability and functionality of an online catalogue (2010) 0.01 
    0.0058314553 = product of:
  0.011662911 = sum of:
    0.011662911 = product of:
      0.03498873 = sum of:
        0.03498873 = weight(_text_:g in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03498873 = score(doc=3952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.01 
    0.0050690663 = product of:
  0.010138133 = sum of:
    0.010138133 = product of:
      0.030414397 = sum of:
        0.030414397 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030414397 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22
  10. Hildreth, C.R.: Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors? : an experimental study (2000) 0.00 
    0.004918428 = product of:
  0.009836856 = sum of:
    0.009836856 = product of:
      0.029510569 = sum of:
        0.029510569 = weight(_text_:c in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029510569 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  11. Ihadjadene, M.; Bouché, R.; Zâafrani, R.: ¬The dynamic nature of searching and browsing on Web-OPACs : the CATHIE experience (2000) 0.00 
    0.004918428 = product of:
  0.009836856 = sum of:
    0.009836856 = product of:
      0.029510569 = sum of:
        0.029510569 = weight(_text_:c in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029510569 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  12. Kules, B.; Capra, R.: Influence of training and stage of search on gaze behavior in a library catalog faceted search interface (2012) 0.00 
    0.004918428 = product of:
  0.009836856 = sum of:
    0.009836856 = product of:
      0.029510569 = sum of:
        0.029510569 = weight(_text_:c in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029510569 = score(doc=4129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study examined how searchers interact with a web-based, faceted library catalog when conducting exploratory searches. It applied multiple methods, including eye tracking and stimulated recall interviews, to investigate important aspects of faceted search interface use, specifically: (a) searcher gaze behavior-what components of the interface searchers look at; (b) how gaze behavior differs when training is and is not provided; (c) how gaze behavior changes as searchers become familiar with the interface; and (d) how gaze behavior differs depending on the stage of the search process. The results confirm previous findings that facets account for approximately 10-30% of interface use. They show that providing a 60-second video demonstration increased searcher use of facets. However, searcher use of the facets did not evolve during the study session, which suggests that searchers may not, on their own, rapidly apply the faceted interfaces. The findings also suggest that searcher use of interface elements varied by the stage of their search during the session, with higher use of facets during decision-making stages. These findings will be of interest to librarians and interface designers who wish to maximize the value of faceted searching for patrons, as well as to researchers who study search behavior.
  13. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.00 
    0.004055253 = product of:
  0.008110506 = sum of:
    0.008110506 = product of:
      0.024331518 = sum of:
        0.024331518 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024331518 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.00 
    0.004055253 = product of:
  0.008110506 = sum of:
    0.008110506 = product of:
      0.024331518 = sum of:
        0.024331518 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024331518 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
  15. Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000) 0.00 
    0.0035483462 = product of:
  0.0070966925 = sum of:
    0.0070966925 = product of:
      0.021290077 = sum of:
        0.021290077 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021290077 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  16. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.00 
    0.0035483462 = product of:
  0.0070966925 = sum of:
    0.0070966925 = product of:
      0.021290077 = sum of:
        0.021290077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021290077 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  17. Oberhauser, O.: Card-Image Public Access Catalogues (CIPACs) : a critical consideration of a cost-effective alternative to full retrospective catalogue conversion (2002) 0.00 
    0.0034428998 = product of:
  0.0068857996 = sum of:
    0.0068857996 = product of:
      0.020657398 = sum of:
        0.020657398 = weight(_text_:c in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020657398 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044896673 = queryNorm
            0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ABI-Technik 21(2002) H.3, S.292 (E. Pietzsch): "Otto C. Oberhauser hat mit seiner Diplomarbeit eine beeindruckende Analyse digitalisierter Zettelkataloge (CIPACs) vorgelegt. Die Arbeit wartet mit einer Fülle von Daten und Statistiken auf, wie sie bislang nicht vorgelegen haben. BibliothekarInnen, die sich mit der Digitalisierung von Katalogen tragen, finden darin eine einzigartige Vorlage zur Entscheidungsfindung. Nach einem einführenden Kapitel bringt Oberhauser zunächst einen Überblick über eine Auswahl weltweit verfügbarer CIPACs, deren Indexierungsmethode (Binäre Suche, partielle Indexierung, Suche in OCR-Daten) und stellt vergleichende Betrachtungen über geographische Verteilung, Größe, Software, Navigation und andere Eigenschaften an. Anschließend beschreibt und analysiert er Implementierungsprobleme, beginnend bei Gründen, die zur Digitalisierung führen können: Kosten, Umsetzungsdauer, Zugriffsverbesserung, Stellplatzersparnis. Er fährt fort mit technischen Aspekten wie Scannen und Qualitätskontrolle, Image Standards, OCR, manueller Nacharbeit, Servertechnologie. Dabei geht er auch auf die eher hinderlichen Eigenschaften älterer Kataloge ein sowie auf die Präsentation im Web und die Anbindung an vorhandene Opacs. Einem wichtigen Aspekt, nämlich der Beurteilung durch die wichtigste Zielgruppe, die BibliotheksbenutzerInnen, hat Oberhauser eine eigene Feldforschung gewidmet, deren Ergebnisse er im letzten Kapitel eingehend analysiert. Anhänge über die Art der Datenerhebung und Einzelbeschreibung vieler Kataloge runden die Arbeit ab. Insgesamt kann ich die Arbeit nur als die eindrucksvollste Sammlung von Daten, Statistiken und Analysen zum Thema CIPACs bezeichnen, die mir bislang begegnet ist. Auf einen schön herausgearbeiteten Einzelaspekt, nämlich die weitgehende Zersplitterung bei den eingesetzten Softwaresystemen, will ich besonders eingehen: Derzeit können wir grob zwischen Komplettlösungen (eine beauftragte Firma führt als Generalunternehmung sämtliche Aufgaben von der Digitalisierung bis zur Ablieferung der fertigen Anwendung aus) und geteilten Lösungen (die Digitalisierung wird getrennt von der Indexierung und der Softwareerstellung vergeben bzw. im eigenen Hause vorgenommen) unterscheiden. Letztere setzen ein Projektmanagement im Hause voraus. Gerade die Softwareerstellung im eigenen Haus aber kann zu Lösungen führen, die kommerziellen Angeboten keineswegs nachstehen. Schade ist nur, daß die vielfältigen Eigenentwicklungen bislang noch nicht zu Initiativen geführt haben, die, ähnlich wie bei Public Domain Software, eine "optimale", kostengünstige und weithin akzeptierte Softwarelösung zum Ziel haben. Einige kritische Anmerkungen sollen dennoch nicht unerwähnt bleiben. Beispielsweise fehlt eine Differenzierung zwischen "Reiterkarten"-Systemen, d.h. solchen mit Indexierung jeder 20. oder 50. Karte, und Systemen mit vollständiger Indexierung sämtlicher Kartenköpfe, führt doch diese weitreichende Designentscheidung zu erheblichen Kostenverschiebungen zwischen Katalogerstellung und späterer Benutzung. Auch bei den statistischen Auswertungen der Feldforschung hätte ich mir eine feinere Differenzierung nach Typ des CIPAC oder nach Bibliothek gewünscht. So haben beispielsweise mehr als die Hälfte der befragten BenutzerInnen angegeben, die Bedienung des CIPAC sei zunächst schwer verständlich oder seine Benutzung sei zeitaufwendig gewesen. Offen beibt jedoch, ob es Unterschiede zwischen den verschiedenen Realisierungstypen gibt.

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 101
  • s 6
  • el 5
  • r 5
  • m 4
  • b 2
  • i 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications