Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Rechtsfragen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Maxwell, T.A.: Mapping information policy frames : the politics of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (2004) 0.05
    0.054190125 = product of:
      0.10838025 = sum of:
        0.10838025 = product of:
          0.2167605 = sum of:
            0.2167605 = weight(_text_:policy in 2063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2167605 = score(doc=2063,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.79479396 = fieldWeight in 2063, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was a significant milestone in congressional information policy legislation. However, the results were widely criticized in some circles as providing too much Power to certain stakeholder groups. This paper uses computerbased content analysis and a theoretical taxonomy of information policy values to analyze congressional hearing testimony. The results of document coding were then analyzed using a variety of statistical tools to map how different stakeholders framed issues in the debate and determine if congressional value statements about the legislation conformed more closely to certain stakeholders. Results of the analysis indicate that significant differences in the use of information policy terms occurred across stakeholders, and showed varying degrees of convergence between congressional or other stakeholders when framing information policy issues.
  2. Noble, S.: Web access and the law : a public policy framework (2002) 0.04
    0.03998499 = product of:
      0.07996998 = sum of:
        0.07996998 = product of:
          0.15993996 = sum of:
            0.15993996 = weight(_text_:policy in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15993996 = score(doc=4784,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article details the public policy framework that establishes the legal foundation for requiring access to Web-based information resources for people with disabilities. Particular areas of focus include: the application of the fair use doctrine to an understanding of disability access to digital information; the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act to Web-based services; and the application of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act to Federal Web-based resources and the extent to which Section 508 may be applicable to states through linkage under the Assistive Technology Act.
  3. Yu, H.: Web accessibility and the law : recommendations for implementation (2002) 0.03
    0.028273653 = product of:
      0.056547306 = sum of:
        0.056547306 = product of:
          0.11309461 = sum of:
            0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 4785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11309461 = score(doc=4785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 4785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of information in electronic format does not guarantee its accessibility. The fact that many Web sites are not accessible to large segments of the disabled community has created a "digital divide". The accessibility barriers are systemic. In recent years, there has been a growing body of significant laws and standards concerning Web accessibility that impact people with disabilities. Ways of breaking down these barriers to a fuller accessibility implementation do exist, including education to raise awareness of Web accessibility, nationwide policy and guidelines for accessibility, and Web-based applications and tools to facilitate Web accessibility, to name a few.
  4. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01
    0.013782796 = product of:
      0.027565593 = sum of:
        0.027565593 = product of:
          0.055131186 = sum of:
            0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055131186 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  5. Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003) 0.01
    0.012059947 = product of:
      0.024119893 = sum of:
        0.024119893 = product of:
          0.048239786 = sum of:
            0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048239786 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05086421 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.12.2005 11:22:13