Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.01 
    0.007977327 = product of:
  0.035897974 = sum of:
    0.014666359 = weight(_text_:of in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014666359 = score(doc=2832,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
    0.021231614 = product of:
      0.042463228 = sum of:
        0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042463228 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Reference librarians, who are thoroughly familiar with the purpose, scope and arrangement of abstract periodicals, are uniquely qualified for the task of writing abstracts. The procedures described here offer a relatively simple way for them to write acceptable abstracts from the outset. Although research is being conducted in the area of machine generated abstracts, there wll continue to be a role for human abstractors.
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  2. Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987) 0.00 
    0.002661118 = product of:
  0.023950063 = sum of:
    0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023950063 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Informatics 9: Meaning: the frontier of informatics: proceedings of a conference. Ed.: K.P. Jones
  3. Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986) 0.00 
    0.002489248 = product of:
  0.022403233 = sum of:
    0.022403233 = weight(_text_:of in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022403233 = score(doc=684,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    A survey of abstracting policies by producers of bibliographical databases examined abstracting guidelines which aim to enhance free- text retrieval. Of the 123 database policies examined, fifty-seven (46 per cent) included such instructions. Editors consider contents of abstracts and their language as a primary factor in retrieval enhancement. Most recommend that once abstractors decide which concepts to include in abstracts and in which form to represent them, these terms should be co-ordinated with index terms assigned from a controlled vocabulary. Guidelines about the type of abstracts, i.e., informative or indicative, and about their length are not affected by the capability of free-text retrieval
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 42(1986), S.11-21
  4. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989) 0.00 
    0.0023521183 = product of:
  0.021169065 = sum of:
    0.021169065 = weight(_text_:of in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021169065 = score(doc=3549,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Presents a theoretical model, based on the Flower/Hayes model of expository writing, of the process involved in content analysis for abstracting and indexing.
    Source
    Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by S. Koshiala and R. Launo
  5. Abstracting and indexing services in perspective : Miles Conrad memorial lectures 1969-1983. Commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services (1983) 0.00 
    0.0016295954 = product of:
  0.014666359 = sum of:
    0.014666359 = weight(_text_:of in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014666359 = score(doc=689,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BAKER, D.B.: Abstracting and indexing services: past, present, and future; KENNEDY, H.E.: A perspective on fifteen years in the abstracting and indexing field; WEIL, B.H.: Will abstracts survive technological developments? and will "cheaper is better" win out?; KILGOUR, F.G.: Comparative development of abstracting and indexing, and monograph cataloging; ROWLETT, R.J.: Abstracts, who needs them?

Authors

Types