-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.02
0.020863095 = product of:
0.04172619 = sum of:
0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02586502 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.01586117 = product of:
0.03172234 = sum of:
0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03172234 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of 2 studies to determine if structured abstracts offer any advantage to users in terms of whether they are easier to search. In study 1, using a specially prepared electronic database of abstracts in either their original format or the structured format, 52 users were asked to find the answers to 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts in traditional format followed by 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts set in the structured format. Time and error data were recorded automatically. In study 2, using a printed database, 56 users were asked to to find 5 abstracts that reprted a particular kind of study and then find 5 more references that reported another kind of study. In study 1 users performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts but there were some unexplainable practice effects. In study 2, the users again performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts. However, there were asymmetrical transfer effects: users who responded first to the structured abstracts responded more quickly to the following traditional abstracts than did those users who responded first to the traditional abstracts. Nevertheless, the overall findings support the hypothesis that it is easier for user to search structured abstracts than it is to search traditional abstracts
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Summarizing text : [Themenheft] (1995)
0.02
0.016956951 = product of:
0.067827806 = sum of:
0.067827806 = product of:
0.13565561 = sum of:
0.13565561 = weight(_text_:processing in 3872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13565561 = score(doc=3872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.7156181 = fieldWeight in 3872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-784
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995)
0.01
0.010491579 = product of:
0.041966315 = sum of:
0.041966315 = product of:
0.08393263 = sum of:
0.08393263 = weight(_text_:processing in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08393263 = score(doc=2930,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.4427661 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- 4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
-
Molina, M.P.: Documentary abstracting : toward a methodological approach (1995)
0.01
0.0103460075 = product of:
0.04138403 = sum of:
0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04138403 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In the general abstracting process (GAP), there are 2 types of data: textual, within a particular framed trilogy (surface, deep, and rhetoric); and documentary (abstractor, means of production, and user demands). Proposes its development, the use of the following disciplines, among others: linguistics (structural, tranformational, and textual), logic (formal and fuzzy), and psychology (cognitive). The model for that textual transformation is based on a system of combined strategies with 4 key stages: reading understanding, selection, interpretation, and synthesis
-
Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.008478476 = product of:
0.033913903 = sum of:
0.033913903 = product of:
0.067827806 = sum of:
0.067827806 = weight(_text_:processing in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067827806 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 36(1996) no.5, S.1050 (V.K. Raman); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573 (H.R. Tibbo)
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.01
0.007930585 = product of:
0.03172234 = sum of:
0.03172234 = product of:
0.06344468 = sum of:
0.06344468 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06344468 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995)
0.01
0.007418666 = product of:
0.029674664 = sum of:
0.029674664 = product of:
0.05934933 = sum of:
0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05934933 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.769-776
-
Rothkegel, A.: Abstracting from the perspective of text production (1995)
0.01
0.007418666 = product of:
0.029674664 = sum of:
0.029674664 = product of:
0.05934933 = sum of:
0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05934933 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.777-784
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarising text for intelligent communication : results of the Dagstuhl seminar (1994)
0.01
0.0063588563 = product of:
0.025435425 = sum of:
0.025435425 = product of:
0.05087085 = sum of:
0.05087085 = weight(_text_:processing in 8867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05087085 = score(doc=8867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 8867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- As a result of the transition to full-text storage, multimedia and networking, information systems are becoming more efficient but at the same time more difficult to use, in particular because users are confronted with information volumes that increasingly exceed individual processing capacities. Consequently, there is an increase in the demand for user aids such as summarising techniques. Against this background, the interdisciplinary Dagstuhl Seminar 'Summarising Text for Intelligent Communication' (Dec. 1993) outlined the academic state of the art with regard to summarising (abstracting) and proposed future directions for research and system development. Research is currently shifting its attention from text summarising to summarising states of affairs. Recycling solutions are put forward in order to satisfy short-term needs for summarisation products. In the medium and long term, it is necessary to devise concepts and methods of intelligent summarising which have a better formal and empirical grounding and a more modular organisation
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.00
0.0047583506 = product of:
0.019033402 = sum of:
0.019033402 = product of:
0.038066804 = sum of:
0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038066804 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.00
0.0047583506 = product of:
0.019033402 = sum of:
0.019033402 = product of:
0.038066804 = sum of:
0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038066804 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
