-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.0068805874 = product of:
0.061925285 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.055655494 = product of:
0.08348324 = sum of:
0.041930214 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041930214 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.041553028 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041553028 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 20. 4.2002 19:29:54
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.00
0.0039317645 = product of:
0.03538588 = sum of:
0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582737 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.031803142 = product of:
0.04770471 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744587 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.00
0.0030919719 = product of:
0.055655494 = sum of:
0.055655494 = product of:
0.08348324 = sum of:
0.041930214 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041930214 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.041553028 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041553028 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
- Date
- 21. 4.2002 9:29:38
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Kells, K.: Indexing classes offered by the Graduate School (USDA) (2007)
0.00
0.002710001 = product of:
0.02439001 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=741,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 741, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=741)
0.019323254 = weight(_text_:der in 741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019323254 = score(doc=741,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 741, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=741)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Dieser Artikel liefert einen Überblick über die beiden von der Graduate School (USDA) angebotenen Indexierungs-Kurse, die jedes Jahr mehrere Hundert Teilnehmer haben. Diese beiden Kurse sind der populärste Indexierungs-Unterricht in den Vereinigten Staaten und bis vor nicht allzu langer Zeit auch der einzige praxisorientierte, dem eigenen Lerntempo folgende Indexierungs-Unterricht in der englischsprachigen Welt.
-
Hudson, A.: Training in indexing : the Society of Indexers' course (2007)
0.00
0.0025929953 = product of:
0.023336958 = sum of:
0.004433411 = weight(_text_:in in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004433411 = score(doc=740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.018903548 = weight(_text_:der in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018903548 = score(doc=740,freq=10.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Gutes Indexieren erfordert verschiedene Begabungen und Fertigkeiten. Obwohl einige davon angeboren sind, ist ein Training in den Prinzipien und Techniken des Indexierens unentbehrlich für den beruflichen Erfolg als Indexer. Der Lehrgang der Society of Indexers, der zur Qualifizierung eines akkreditierten Indexers führt, basiert auf britischen und internationalen Normen und besteht aus vier Lehrgangseinheiten. Die Beurteilung geschieht durch vier formale Tests, und die Lehrgangsteilnehmer müssen außerdem Online-Tutorials durcharbeiten und einen praktischen Indexierungs-Auftrag übernehmen. Für die Lehrgangsteilnehmer steht zusätzliche Unterstützung zur Verfügung und ein Workshop-Programm ist auf die Belange der Lehrgangsteilnehmer und der beteiligten Indexer zugeschnitten.
-
Wittmann, C.: Limitations of indexing modules in word-processing software (1991)
0.00
0.002575293 = product of:
0.023177637 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 8076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=8076,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 8076, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8076)
0.016907847 = weight(_text_:der in 8076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016907847 = score(doc=8076,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 8076, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8076)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Eigenschaften und Grenzen einer Registerherstellung mit Standardmodulen der Textverarbeitung
-
Fassbender, J.: Professionelle Registererstellung : Das DNI informierte auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2006 (2007)
0.00
0.0024366465 = product of:
0.021929817 = sum of:
0.0035049194 = weight(_text_:in in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035049194 = score(doc=778,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.11761922 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
0.018424898 = weight(_text_:der in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018424898 = score(doc=778,freq=38.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.37651968 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Content
- "Wie bereits in den Vorjahren hielt das Deutsche Netzwerk der Indexer (DNI) auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2006 sein Jahrestreffen ab - diesmal im Rahmen der Jahreskonferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis (DGI). Im Mittelpunkt des Treffens stand eine offene Informationsveranstaltung mit Präsentationen zu Aspekten professioneller Registererstellung, die sehr gut besucht war. Neben Gästen aus der Publikationsbranche sowie von der DGI kamen Indexer vom Niederländischen Indexer-Netzwerk sowie spezielle Gäste aus den USA und Großbritannien. Jochen Fassbender vom DNI hielt einen Vortrag über grundsätzliche Thesen zur Lage des Indexing in Deutschland. Die im internationalen Vergleich noch erhebliche Defizite aufweisende Situation im deutschsprachigen Raum wurde durch vier Bereiche beleuchtet. 1. Registererstellung beschränkt sich keineswegs nur - wie immer noch weitläufig angenommen - auf das bloße Anstreichen von Textwörtern. Eine derartige Vorgehensweise führt zu konkordanzähnlichen Verzeichnissen statt zu Registern. Es geht vielmehr darum, das Gemeinte aus dem Text in Registereinträge umzusetzen und diese mit einem Beziehungsgeflecht zu verbinden. 2. Die Erstellung von Registern durch Autoren, Herausgebern oder gar Hilfskräften - womöglich kurz vor Ende eines Projektes - hat oft erhebliche Mängel zur Folge, da aus Fachkreisen immer wieder bestätigt wird, dass derartige Personengruppen - im Gegensatz zu professionellen Indexern - kaum über adäquates Fachwissen zur methodischen Vorgehensweise bei der Registererstellung noch über geeignete Indexing-Programme verfügen. 3. Moderne Registererstellung muss keineswegs mit Tools wie Word oder Layout-Programmen durchgeführt werden, deren Einsatz aus Indexer-Sicht z. T. erhebliche Nachteile mit sich bringt. Der weitaus größte Teil der weltweit arbeitenden Indexer arbeitet mit so genannter Dedicated Indexing Software, welche die vielfachen Aspekte bei der Registererstellung hervorragend unterstützt.
4. Ferner wurde darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass mit dem DNI auch im deutschsprachigen Raum eine Plattform für professionelles Indexing vorhanden ist, die sowohl hervorragende Kontakte zu den weltweit führenden angloamerikanischen Fachverbänden unterhält als auch Indexerinnen und Indexer für die Registererstellung für Fach- und Sachbücher als auch Periodika und Online-Medien bereitstellt. Maureen MacGlashan von der britischen Society of Indexers (SI) hielt einen Vortrag über die Fachzeitschrift The Indexer, das internationale Fachblatt der Indexing-Szene schlechthin. Maureen MacGlashan ist die derzeitige Hauptherausgeberin und erläuterte die Entstehungsgeschichte und Inhalte dieser bereits 1958 gegründeten Zeitschrift sowie deren Website www. theindexer.org, auf der ein Online-Index zur Verfügung steht. Ferner machte sie auf die im Oktober 2006 erscheinende Ausgabe aufmerksam, die als Schwerpunkt viele Aspekte des Indexing außerhalb des englischen Sprachraums beinhaltet. An dieser Ausgabe hatte auch das DNI als Gastherausgeber mitgearbeitet. Ein absolutes Debüt auf der Buchmesse war der Vortrag von Frances Lennie aus den USA, die mit CINDEX erstmals eine Dedicated Indexing Software vorstellte. Jede Person, die derartige Software kennen gelernt hat, weiß um den großen Unterschied zu der mühseligen Indexerstellung in Word. Frances Lennie zeigte, wie leicht und elegant Haupt- und Untereinträge sowie Querverweise mit CINDEX erstellt werden können. Die mit dieser Software viel effizienter erstellten Registereinträge lassen sich anschließend sogar in Word-Dokumente einbetten. Ein reichlich gedeckter Tisch mit InfoMaterial (z. B. Hefte von The Indexer, CDs mit einer Demo-Version von CINDEX) und der Hinweis, dass sowohl Mitglieder des DNI als auch die Society of Indexers Seminare zum professionellen Indexing anbieten, rundete die gelungene Veranstaltung ab. Weitere Informationen zum DNI und zur Registererstellung finden sich auf der DNI-Website www.d-indexer.org."
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.00
0.0022356445 = product of:
0.0201208 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.013851009 = product of:
0.041553028 = sum of:
0.041553028 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041553028 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.00
0.0022356445 = product of:
0.0201208 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.013851009 = product of:
0.041553028 = sum of:
0.041553028 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041553028 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.00
0.0022356445 = product of:
0.0201208 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.013851009 = product of:
0.041553028 = sum of:
0.041553028 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041553028 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.00
0.0022356445 = product of:
0.0201208 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.013851009 = product of:
0.041553028 = sum of:
0.041553028 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041553028 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.00
0.0022356445 = product of:
0.0201208 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.013851009 = product of:
0.041553028 = sum of:
0.041553028 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041553028 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.00
0.0020979063 = product of:
0.018881157 = sum of:
0.011955653 = weight(_text_:der in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011955653 = score(doc=749,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.0069255047 = product of:
0.020776514 = sum of:
0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020776514 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.00
0.0018066735 = product of:
0.016260061 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.011193305 = product of:
0.033579916 = sum of:
0.033579916 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033579916 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.00
0.0018030024 = product of:
0.016227022 = sum of:
0.0063334443 = weight(_text_:in in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0063334443 = score(doc=113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.0098935785 = product of:
0.029680735 = sum of:
0.029680735 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029680735 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The development of international relations and technology predominated in indexing through these four years, 1992-95, as reflected in the four societies' international journal, The Indexer.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.00
0.001675593 = product of:
0.0150803365 = sum of:
0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165474 = score(doc=1427,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.007914863 = product of:
0.023744587 = sum of:
0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744587 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Maislin, S.: Cyborg indexing : half-human half-machine (2007)
0.00
0.0014715961 = product of:
0.013244364 = sum of:
0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582737 = score(doc=738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
0.009661627 = weight(_text_:der in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009661627 = score(doc=738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Die qualitativen Vorteile des Indexierens durch den Menschen werden nicht durch automatisches Indexieren verdrängt, aber bei besonders großen Projekten ist das Indexieren durch den Menschen nicht durchführbar. Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse ist notwendig, um den praktischen Nutzen automatischer Indexierung mit der Wahrscheinlichkeit von Fehlern und deren Konsequenzen abzuwägen, die in beiden Ansätzen entstehen können. Das Integrieren von nicht-automatischer und automatischer Indexierung, das hier "Cyborg Indexing" genannt wird, kann Häufigkeit und Auswirkung von Fehlern beider Ansätze minimieren.
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.00
0.001442402 = product of:
0.012981618 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=4642,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.007914863 = product of:
0.023744587 = sum of:
0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744587 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Evans, R.: Indexing computer books : getting started (2007)
0.00
0.0014371951 = product of:
0.0129347555 = sum of:
0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026870528 = score(doc=745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=745)
0.010247703 = weight(_text_:der in 745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010247703 = score(doc=745,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.20941564 = fieldWeight in 745, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=745)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Sie wollen Ihr Indexing-Business erweitern? Sie erwägen ein weiteres Fachgebiet, wie z. B. Computer-Bücher? Indexer, die neu im Bereich Computer-Bücher sind, haben wahrscheinlich mehrere Fragen: Was sind Computer-Bücher? Wie unterscheiden sie sich von akademischen Werken? Wo ist der Markt für diesen Bereich? Wer ist die Leserschaft? Wie anspruchsvoll sind sie? Habe ich das nötige technische Fachwissen, um diese Bücher zu verstehen und dafür Register zu erstellen? Gibt es Tipps und Tricks für das Indexieren? Was sind die besten Programme? Wie viel kann man verdienen? Welche Ressourcen sind verfügbar? Dieser Artikel beschreibt den Prozess des Indexierens von Computer-Büchern, der einen Mittelweg zwischen Kosten und Qualität findet, was dem Indexierer erlaubt, mit oft technischem und unvertrautem Material umzugehen und es in einer planmäßigen und logischen Weise zu indexieren.
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.00
0.0013748235 = product of:
0.012373411 = sum of:
0.007426622 = weight(_text_:in in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007426622 = score(doc=5775,freq=22.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.24922498 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.0049467892 = product of:
0.014840367 = sum of:
0.014840367 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014840367 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"
