-
Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998)
0.01
0.0064955507 = product of:
0.022734426 = sum of:
0.0055578267 = product of:
0.027789133 = sum of:
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
- Date
- 9. 4.2000 17:22:00
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.00
0.0042065145 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = product of:
0.0588912 = sum of:
0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0588912 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.00
0.0042065145 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = product of:
0.0588912 = sum of:
0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0588912 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.00
0.00396594 = product of:
0.027761579 = sum of:
0.027761579 = product of:
0.055523157 = sum of:
0.055523157 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055523157 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
BIOSIS introduces new relational indexing scheme and additional information in 1998 (1998)
0.00
0.0034888082 = product of:
0.024421657 = sum of:
0.024421657 = product of:
0.06105414 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In 1998 BIOSIS will introduce a new relational indexing system to provide more specific natural language retrieval for its electronic products. Printed publications will have a redesigned subject index to replace the KWIC index and an organism index, replacing the current generic and biosystematic indexes, will allow hierarchical access to kingdom, family and common genus species names
-
Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers (1999)
0.00
0.0030527073 = product of:
0.02136895 = sum of:
0.02136895 = product of:
0.053422377 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=6682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=6682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- We describe Rosetta, an indexing and retrieval system for collections of research papers. Rosetta indexes papers in a collection based on the way they have been described when referenced by other papers in the collection. With this technique, indices for papers describe information provided in the same way a query describes information needed. Using Rosetta, simple natural language queries retrieve high-precision results in which descriptions based on citations clearly summarize retrieved papers; allowing users to quickly determine which papers most closely meet their information needs
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.00
0.0028043431 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.00
0.0028043431 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.00
0.0028043431 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.00
0.0024538 = product of:
0.0171766 = sum of:
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
Z39.4-199X: Indexes and related information retrieval devices (1993)
0.00
0.0014647568 = product of:
0.010253297 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Stelmach, M.: ¬The application of index entries to search and retrieval of books and book content (1999)
0.00
0.0014647568 = product of:
0.010253297 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=6311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6311)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992)
0.00
0.0011837021 = product of:
0.008285915 = sum of:
0.008285915 = product of:
0.04142957 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Consideration of some of the choices for computerization of indexes, including word processing, records administration systems, and text-retrieval packages. Some of the general concepts relating to indexes are also covered, including various approaches to indexing such as subject, word, and hierarchical indexing, and the use of coordinated themes. The options available within each type of computerization of indexing are also specified
-
Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996)
0.00
0.0010462549 = product of:
0.007323784 = sum of:
0.007323784 = product of:
0.03661892 = sum of:
0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03661892 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Considers the indexing of scientific and medical periodicals, covering the need for indexes, the effect on information retrieval of the electronic revolution, types of journals and entries, the process of indexing, cumulation and publisher-indexer relations
-
Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994)
0.00
0.0010357393 = product of:
0.007250175 = sum of:
0.007250175 = product of:
0.036250874 = sum of:
0.036250874 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036250874 = score(doc=949,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
-
Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997)
0.00
0.0010357393 = product of:
0.007250175 = sum of:
0.007250175 = product of:
0.036250874 = sum of:
0.036250874 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036250874 = score(doc=3905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
-
Imholtz, A.A.: Indexer nascitur, not fit : Lewis Carroll as indexer again (1996)
0.00
9.0740033E-4 = product of:
0.006351802 = sum of:
0.006351802 = product of:
0.03175901 = sum of:
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 6935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=6935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 6935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6935)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The author Lewis Carroll produced humorous indexes to his late novels, childhood magazines, and to Tennyson's poem 'In Memoriam'. He also produced an indexing system for his personal correspondence. Details the procedure he followed in this letter register and reports on a study of it which shows that he employed, in embryonic form, 20th century database concepts
-
Anderson, J.D.: Guidelines for indexes and related information retrieval devices (1997)
0.00
8.877766E-4 = product of:
0.006214436 = sum of:
0.006214436 = product of:
0.03107218 = sum of:
0.03107218 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03107218 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This technical report provides guidelines for the content, organization, and presentation of indexes used for the retrieval of documents and parts of documents. It deals with the principles of indexing, regardless of the type of material indexed, the indexing method used (intellectual analysis, machine algorithm, or both), the medium of the index, or the method of presentation for searching. It emphasizes 4 processes essential for all indexes: comprehensive design, vocabulary management, and the provision of systax. It includes definitions of indexes and of their parts, attributes, and aspects; a uniform vocabulary; treatment of the nature and variety of indexes; and recommendations regarding the design, organization, and presentation of indexes. It does not suggest guidelines for every detail or technique of indexing. These can be determined for each index on the basis of factors covered in the technical report
-
Bell, H.: On the indexability of butterflies (1992)
0.00
8.3700387E-4 = product of:
0.0058590267 = sum of:
0.0058590267 = product of:
0.029295133 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Most publishers, who are cost-conscious, and the majority of authors, who are creativity-conscious, oppos indexes for fiction. However, maintains, that there is a case to be made for the indexing of serious fiction, whose readers have the same needs for information retrieval with regard to characters, places and events, as readers of biographies and histories
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Why postcoordination fails the searcher (1995)
0.00
8.3700387E-4 = product of:
0.0058590267 = sum of:
0.0058590267 = product of:
0.029295133 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Postcoordination, in which terms are combined at the searching stage rather than at the time of indexing, has been the main form of database access since the 1950s. Reasons for the failure of postcoordinate searches include the absence of specified relationships between terms, the complexity of formulating Boolean searches, and the high frequency of terms in large databases. Recent writers on indexing electronic text have called for precoordination to enhance the precision of retrieval. Among precoordinate indexing structures, a book index with coined modifications is the most precise. The time and cost associated with such customized analysis will, however, limit its application in the electronic environment
