Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Diepeveen, C.; Fassbender, J.; Robertson, M.: Indexing software (2007) 0.02 
    0.02167037 = product of:
  0.06501111 = sum of:
    0.031526286 = weight(_text_:und in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031526286 = score(doc=742,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0439102 = queryNorm
        0.32394084 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
    0.03348482 = product of:
      0.06696964 = sum of:
        0.06696964 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06696964 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071943 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.2902644 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag handelt von unterschiedlichen Arten verfügbarer Software zur Erzeugung von Registern und untersucht, ob diese dazu benutzt werden können, ein Register nach internationalen Normen zu erstellen. Da oft behauptet wird, dass die Registererstellung mit einem Computer und ohne Einsatz des Menschen durchführbar sei, untersuchen die Autoren, weshalb Indexieren eine Aktivität des Menschen sein muss und weshalb eine automatische Registererstellung kein zufriedenstellendes Register hervorbringen kann. Automatische Registererstellung kann bestenfalls einen Ausgangspunkt zur weiteren Indexierung liefern. Anschließend wird die Möglichkeit der Registererstellung mit allgemein verfügbarer Software untersucht. Dies kann akzeptable Register hervorbringen, wenngleich oft nur auf mühsame Weise. Für den professionellen Indexierer stellt daher spezielle Indexing Software die bevorzugte Option dar. Die drei am meisten benutzten speziellen Indexierungsprogramme werden kurz bewertet. Ausrichtung und Aussehen dieser Programme sind sehr unterschiedlich, aber die Merkmale und Output-Optionen sind sehr ähnlich. Website Indexing ist ein relativ neues Spezialgebiet innerhalb der Disziplin des Indexierens. Zwei Programme - eine Freeware und ein kommerzielles - zur Erstellung von Registern von Websites werden erörtert. Das Fazit insgesamt ist, dass das Registermachen eine Aktivität ist, die intellektuellen Input des Menschen benötigt. Software kann den Input hervorragend verbessern, aber nicht den Anteil des Menschen daran ersetzen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.413-420
  2. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.02 
    0.018939663 = product of:
  0.05681899 = sum of:
    0.033022083 = weight(_text_:und in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033022083 = score(doc=737,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0439102 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
    0.023796905 = product of:
      0.04759381 = sum of:
        0.04759381 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04759381 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Recycling eines Buchregisters Eine Index-Revision liegt dann vor, wenn das Register zu einer vorhergehenden Auflage eines Buches für die Neuauflage überarbeitet wird. Es gibt Vor- und Nachteile beim Versuch, einen Index zu überarbeiten - sowie verschiedene Erfolgsmaßstäbe. Eine detaillierte Fallstudie wir vorgestellt und die benutzte Software-Methode beschrieben.
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.394-398
  3. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.02 
    0.016572205 = product of:
  0.049716614 = sum of:
    0.02889432 = weight(_text_:und in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02889432 = score(doc=749,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0439102 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
    0.020822292 = product of:
      0.041644584 = sum of:
        0.041644584 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041644584 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.441-444
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Kumar, T.V.R.; Parameswaran, M.: Chain procedure and dictionary catalogue (1998) 0.01 
    0.013393927 = product of:
  0.080363564 = sum of:
    0.080363564 = product of:
      0.16072713 = sum of:
        0.16072713 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 6205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16072713 = score(doc=6205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071943 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.69663453 = fieldWeight in 6205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  5. Hudson, A.: Training in indexing : the Society of Indexers' course (2007) 0.01 
    0.008341072 = product of:
  0.05004643 = sum of:
    0.05004643 = weight(_text_:und in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05004643 = score(doc=740,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0439102 = queryNorm
        0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Gutes Indexieren erfordert verschiedene Begabungen und Fertigkeiten. Obwohl einige davon angeboren sind, ist ein Training in den Prinzipien und Techniken des Indexierens unentbehrlich für den beruflichen Erfolg als Indexer. Der Lehrgang der Society of Indexers, der zur Qualifizierung eines akkreditierten Indexers führt, basiert auf britischen und internationalen Normen und besteht aus vier Lehrgangseinheiten. Die Beurteilung geschieht durch vier formale Tests, und die Lehrgangsteilnehmer müssen außerdem Online-Tutorials durcharbeiten und einen praktischen Indexierungs-Auftrag übernehmen. Für die Lehrgangsteilnehmer steht zusätzliche Unterstützung zur Verfügung und ein Workshop-Programm ist auf die Belange der Lehrgangsteilnehmer und der beteiligten Indexer zugeschnitten.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.407-409
  6. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01 
    0.007932302 = product of:
  0.04759381 = sum of:
    0.04759381 = product of:
      0.09518762 = sum of:
        0.09518762 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09518762 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  7. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01 
    0.007932302 = product of:
  0.04759381 = sum of:
    0.04759381 = product of:
      0.09518762 = sum of:
        0.09518762 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09518762 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  8. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01 
    0.007932302 = product of:
  0.04759381 = sum of:
    0.04759381 = product of:
      0.09518762 = sum of:
        0.09518762 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09518762 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  9. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01 
    0.007932302 = product of:
  0.04759381 = sum of:
    0.04759381 = product of:
      0.09518762 = sum of:
        0.09518762 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09518762 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  10. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  11. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  12. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  13. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  14. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  15. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  16. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  17. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  18. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01 
    0.0069407644 = product of:
  0.041644584 = sum of:
    0.041644584 = product of:
      0.08328917 = sum of:
        0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08328917 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  19. Browne, G.: Changes in website indexing (2007) 0.01 
    0.0068104565 = product of:
  0.04086274 = sum of:
    0.04086274 = weight(_text_:und in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04086274 = score(doc=747,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0439102 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Website-Indexing wurde in den 1990er Jahren wichtig, als Indexierer, Bibliothekare und Web-Manager mit verschiedenen Ansätzen experimentierten, einen besseren Zugang zu Informationen zu schaffen, die sie über das Internet anboten. Die Tools, mit denen Register erstellt werden, reichten von simpler HTML-Codierung bis zu HTML Indexer und anderer spezieller Software. Neue Indexe und Software-Produkte entstanden, aber viele Website-Register sind auch wieder verschwunden. Es werden die Gründe für die Erstellung von Website-Indexen dargestellt und Beispiele von Website-Indexen und anderen Zugangsoptionen erläutert, die in den letzten 15 Jahren entstanden, die aber nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen. Es werden einige Vermutungen über die Gründe für diese Veränderungen angestellt.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.437-440
  20. Maislin, S.: Cyborg indexing : half-human half-machine (2007) 0.01 
    0.0063551026 = product of:
  0.038130615 = sum of:
    0.038130615 = weight(_text_:und in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038130615 = score(doc=738,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0439102 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Die qualitativen Vorteile des Indexierens durch den Menschen werden nicht durch automatisches Indexieren verdrängt, aber bei besonders großen Projekten ist das Indexieren durch den Menschen nicht durchführbar. Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse ist notwendig, um den praktischen Nutzen automatischer Indexierung mit der Wahrscheinlichkeit von Fehlern und deren Konsequenzen abzuwägen, die in beiden Ansätzen entstehen können. Das Integrieren von nicht-automatischer und automatischer Indexierung, das hier "Cyborg Indexing" genannt wird, kann Häufigkeit und Auswirkung von Fehlern beider Ansätze minimieren.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.399-401

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 37
  • m 7

Themes

Subjects

Classifications