-
Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (1999)
0.00
0.003813412 = product of:
0.030507296 = sum of:
0.010115947 = weight(_text_:und in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010115947 = score(doc=5777,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.010275402 = weight(_text_:der in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010275402 = score(doc=5777,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.20941564 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.010115947 = weight(_text_:und in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010115947 = score(doc=5777,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Classification
- ST 230 [Informatik # Monographien # Software und -entwicklung # Software allgemein, (Einführung, Lehrbücher, Methoden der Programmierung) Software engineering, Programmentwicklungssysteme, Softwarewerkzeuge]
- RVK
- ST 230 [Informatik # Monographien # Software und -entwicklung # Software allgemein, (Einführung, Lehrbücher, Methoden der Programmierung) Software engineering, Programmentwicklungssysteme, Softwarewerkzeuge]
-
Notess, G.R.: Search engine relevance : the never-ending quest (2000)
0.00
0.003584227 = product of:
0.043010723 = sum of:
0.026057174 = weight(_text_:des in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026057174 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
0.016953548 = weight(_text_:der in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016953548 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Abstract
- Bericht über verschiedene Relevanzverfahren der Suchdienste des Internet
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.00
8.6802803E-4 = product of:
0.020832673 = sum of:
0.020832673 = product of:
0.041665345 = sum of:
0.041665345 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041665345 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Courtois, M.P.; Berry, M.W.: Results ranking in Web search engines (1999)
0.00
7.7551126E-4 = product of:
0.01861227 = sum of:
0.01861227 = weight(_text_:des in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01861227 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- Comparaison des méthodes de classement de 5 moteurs de recherche (AltaVista, HotBot, Excie, Infoseek et Lycos). Sont testées la présence de tous les mots, la proximité et la localisation
-
Bilal, D.: Ranking, relevance judgment, and precision of information retrieval on children's queries : evaluation of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and ask Kids (2012)
0.00
4.6116364E-4 = product of:
0.011067927 = sum of:
0.011067927 = product of:
0.03320378 = sum of:
0.03320378 = weight(_text_:p in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03320378 = score(doc=393,freq=14.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42041177 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Abstract
- This study employed benchmarking and intellectual relevance judgment in evaluating Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and Ask Kids on 30 queries that children formulated to find information for specific tasks. Retrieved hits on given queries were benchmarked to Google's and Yahoo! Kids' top-five ranked hits retrieved. Relevancy of hits was judged on a graded scale; precision was calculated using the precision-at-ten metric (P@10). Yahoo! and Bing produced a similar percentage in hit overlap with Google (nearly 30%), but differed in the ranking of hits. Ask Kids retrieved 11% in hit overlap with Google versus 3% by Yahoo! Kids. The engines retrieved 26 hits across query clusters that overlapped with Yahoo! Kids' top-five ranked hits. Precision (P) that the engines produced across the queries was P = 0.48 for relevant hits, and P = 0.28 for partially relevant hits. Precision by Ask Kids was P = 0.44 for relevant hits versus P = 0.21 by Yahoo! Kids. Bing produced the highest total precision (TP) of relevant hits (TP = 0.86) across the queries, and Yahoo! Kids yielded the lowest (TP = 0.47). Average precision (AP) of relevant hits was AP = 0.56 by leading engines versus AP = 0.29 by small engines. In contrast, average precision of partially relevant hits was AP = 0.83 by small engines versus AP = 0.33 by leading engines. Average precision of relevant hits across the engines was highest on two-word queries and lowest on one-word queries. Google performed best on natural language queries; Bing did the same (P = 0.69) on two-word queries. The findings have implications for search engine ranking algorithms, relevance theory, search engine design, research design, and information literacy.
-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.00
3.72012E-4 = product of:
0.008928288 = sum of:
0.008928288 = product of:
0.017856576 = sum of:
0.017856576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017856576 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
