Search (100 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Okada, M.; Ando, K.; Lee, S.S.; Hayashi, Y.; Aoe, J.I.: ¬An efficient substring search method by using delayed keyword extraction (2001) 0.00
    7.507777E-4 = product of:
      0.018018665 = sum of:
        0.018018665 = product of:
          0.03603733 = sum of:
            0.03603733 = weight(_text_:29 in 6415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03603733 = score(doc=6415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2002 17:24:03
  2. Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval: diagnosing information need : Part II: uncertainty expansion in a prototype of a diagnostic IR tool (1998) 0.00
    7.507777E-4 = product of:
      0.018018665 = sum of:
        0.018018665 = product of:
          0.03603733 = sum of:
            0.03603733 = weight(_text_:29 in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03603733 = score(doc=6432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 14:48:29
  3. Wechsler, M.; Schäuble, P.: ¬The probability ranking principle revisited (2000) 0.00
    6.972139E-4 = product of:
      0.016733134 = sum of:
        0.016733134 = product of:
          0.0501994 = sum of:
            0.0501994 = weight(_text_:p in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0501994 = score(doc=3827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
  4. Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011) 0.00
    6.404319E-4 = product of:
      0.015370364 = sum of:
        0.015370364 = product of:
          0.046111092 = sum of:
            0.046111092 = weight(_text_:p in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046111092 = score(doc=4349,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.58383846 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Abstract
    Ranking scientific productivity and prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
    Object
    P-Rank
  5. Zhang, W.; Korf, R.E.: Performance of linear-space search algorithms (1995) 0.00
    6.256481E-4 = product of:
      0.015015555 = sum of:
        0.015015555 = product of:
          0.03003111 = sum of:
            0.03003111 = weight(_text_:29 in 4744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03003111 = score(doc=4744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    2. 8.1996 10:29:15
  6. Perry, R.; Willett, P.: ¬A revies of the use of inverted files for best match searching in information retrieval systems (1983) 0.00
    6.1006215E-4 = product of:
      0.014641492 = sum of:
        0.014641492 = product of:
          0.043924473 = sum of:
            0.043924473 = weight(_text_:p in 2701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043924473 = score(doc=2701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 2701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
  7. Jascó, P.: Mapping algorithms to translate natural language questions into search queries for Web databases (1997) 0.00
    5.2291044E-4 = product of:
      0.01254985 = sum of:
        0.01254985 = product of:
          0.03764955 = sum of:
            0.03764955 = weight(_text_:p in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764955 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
  8. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probability ranking principle in IR (1977) 0.00
    5.2291044E-4 = product of:
      0.01254985 = sum of:
        0.01254985 = product of:
          0.03764955 = sum of:
            0.03764955 = weight(_text_:p in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764955 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willet. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.281-286.
  9. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval (1988) 0.00
    5.2291044E-4 = product of:
      0.01254985 = sum of:
        0.01254985 = product of:
          0.03764955 = sum of:
            0.03764955 = weight(_text_:p in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764955 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.323-328.
  10. Sparck Jones, K.: Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information (1979) 0.00
    5.2291044E-4 = product of:
      0.01254985 = sum of:
        0.01254985 = product of:
          0.03764955 = sum of:
            0.03764955 = weight(_text_:p in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764955 = score(doc=1939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.329-338.
  11. Uratani, N.; Takeda, M.: ¬A fast string-searching algorithm for multiple patterns (1993) 0.00
    5.005185E-4 = product of:
      0.0120124435 = sum of:
        0.0120124435 = product of:
          0.024024887 = sum of:
            0.024024887 = weight(_text_:29 in 6275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024024887 = score(doc=6275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.6, S.775-791
  12. Vechtomova, O.; Karamuftuoglu, M.: Lexical cohesion and term proximity in document ranking (2008) 0.00
    5.005185E-4 = product of:
      0.0120124435 = sum of:
        0.0120124435 = product of:
          0.024024887 = sum of:
            0.024024887 = weight(_text_:29 in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024024887 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:29:05
  13. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.00
    4.96016E-4 = product of:
      0.011904384 = sum of:
        0.011904384 = product of:
          0.023808768 = sum of:
            0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023808768 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  14. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.00
    4.96016E-4 = product of:
      0.011904384 = sum of:
        0.011904384 = product of:
          0.023808768 = sum of:
            0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023808768 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  15. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.00
    4.96016E-4 = product of:
      0.011904384 = sum of:
        0.011904384 = product of:
          0.023808768 = sum of:
            0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023808768 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  16. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.00
    4.96016E-4 = product of:
      0.011904384 = sum of:
        0.011904384 = product of:
          0.023808768 = sum of:
            0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023808768 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  17. Bilal, D.: Ranking, relevance judgment, and precision of information retrieval on children's queries : evaluation of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and ask Kids (2012) 0.00
    4.6116364E-4 = product of:
      0.011067927 = sum of:
        0.011067927 = product of:
          0.03320378 = sum of:
            0.03320378 = weight(_text_:p in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03320378 = score(doc=393,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.42041177 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Abstract
    This study employed benchmarking and intellectual relevance judgment in evaluating Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and Ask Kids on 30 queries that children formulated to find information for specific tasks. Retrieved hits on given queries were benchmarked to Google's and Yahoo! Kids' top-five ranked hits retrieved. Relevancy of hits was judged on a graded scale; precision was calculated using the precision-at-ten metric (P@10). Yahoo! and Bing produced a similar percentage in hit overlap with Google (nearly 30%), but differed in the ranking of hits. Ask Kids retrieved 11% in hit overlap with Google versus 3% by Yahoo! Kids. The engines retrieved 26 hits across query clusters that overlapped with Yahoo! Kids' top-five ranked hits. Precision (P) that the engines produced across the queries was P = 0.48 for relevant hits, and P = 0.28 for partially relevant hits. Precision by Ask Kids was P = 0.44 for relevant hits versus P = 0.21 by Yahoo! Kids. Bing produced the highest total precision (TP) of relevant hits (TP = 0.86) across the queries, and Yahoo! Kids yielded the lowest (TP = 0.47). Average precision (AP) of relevant hits was AP = 0.56 by leading engines versus AP = 0.29 by small engines. In contrast, average precision of partially relevant hits was AP = 0.83 by small engines versus AP = 0.33 by leading engines. Average precision of relevant hits across the engines was highest on two-word queries and lowest on one-word queries. Google performed best on natural language queries; Bing did the same (P = 0.69) on two-word queries. The findings have implications for search engine ranking algorithms, relevance theory, search engine design, research design, and information literacy.
  18. Paris, L.A.H.; Tibbo, H.R.: Freestyle vs. Boolean : a comparison of partial and exact match retrieval systems (1998) 0.00
    4.3795368E-4 = product of:
      0.010510888 = sum of:
        0.010510888 = product of:
          0.021021776 = sum of:
            0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021021776 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    12. 3.1999 10:29:27
  19. Otterbacher, J.; Erkan, G.; Radev, D.R.: Biased LexRank : passage retrieval using random walks with question-based priors (2009) 0.00
    4.3795368E-4 = product of:
      0.010510888 = sum of:
        0.010510888 = product of:
          0.021021776 = sum of:
            0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021021776 = score(doc=2450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    22.11.2008 17:11:29
  20. Willett, P.: Best-match text retrieval (1993) 0.00
    4.357587E-4 = product of:
      0.010458209 = sum of:
        0.010458209 = product of:
          0.031374626 = sum of:
            0.031374626 = weight(_text_:p in 7818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031374626 = score(doc=7818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 7818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7818)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    

Types

  • a 91
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • p 2
  • s 2
  • d 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…