Search (107 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Borlund, P.: Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems (2000) 0.01
    0.007138887 = product of:
      0.028555548 = sum of:
        0.028555548 = weight(_text_:information in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028555548 = score(doc=2556,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.46549135 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Evaluation
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval / Datenbankverwaltung / Hochschulschrift (GBV)
    Information Retrieval / Dialogsystem (SWB)
    Information Retrieval / Dialogsystem / Leistungsbewertung (BVB)
    Subject
    Information Retrieval / Datenbankverwaltung / Hochschulschrift (GBV)
    Information Retrieval / Dialogsystem (SWB)
    Information Retrieval / Dialogsystem / Leistungsbewertung (BVB)
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Evaluation
  2. Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval : Part IV: Testing the timing of two information retrieval devices in a naturalistic setting (2001) 0.01
    0.006182458 = product of:
      0.024729831 = sum of:
        0.024729831 = weight(_text_:information in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024729831 = score(doc=365,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.1, S.163-182
  3. Beaulieu, M.: Approaches to user-based studies in information seeking and retrieval : a Sheffield perspective (2003) 0.01
    0.0058892816 = product of:
      0.023557127 = sum of:
        0.023557127 = weight(_text_:information in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023557127 = score(doc=4692,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.4, S.239-248
  4. Newby, G.B.: Cognitive space and information space (2001) 0.01
    0.0050479556 = product of:
      0.020191822 = sum of:
        0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 6977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020191822 = score(doc=6977,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 6977, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6977)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article works towards realization of exosomatic memory for information systems. In exosomatic memory systems, the information spaces of systems will be consistent with the cognitive spaces of their human users. A method for measuring concept relations in human cognitive space is presented: the paired comparison survey with Principal Components Analysis. A study to measure the cognitive spaces of 16 research participants is presented. Items measured include relations among seven TREC topic statements as well as 17 concepts from the topic statements. A method for automatically generating information spaces from document collections is presented that uses term cooccurrence, eigensystems analysis, and Principal Components Analysis. The extent of similarity between the cognitive spaces and the information spaces, which were derived independently from each other, is measured. A strong similarity between the information spaces and the cognitive spaces are found, indicating that the methods described may have good utility for working towards information systems that operate as exosomatic memories
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1026-1048
  5. Borlund, P.: ¬The IIR evaluation model : a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems (2003) 0.01
    0.0050479556 = product of:
      0.020191822 = sum of:
        0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020191822 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information Research. 8(2003), no.3
  6. Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information (2004) 0.01
    0.0050479556 = product of:
      0.020191822 = sum of:
        0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020191822 = score(doc=4127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
  7. Tague-Sutcliffe, J.: Information retrieval experimentation (2009) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=3801,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Jean Tague-Sutcliffe was an important figure in information retrieval experimentation. Here, she reviews the history of IR research, and provides a description of the fundamental paradigm of information retrieval experimentation that continues to dominate the field.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  8. Borlund, P.: Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems (2000) 0.00
    0.0044618044 = product of:
      0.017847218 = sum of:
        0.017847218 = weight(_text_:information in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017847218 = score(doc=4549,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a set of basic components which constitutes the experimental setting intended for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval (IIR) systems, the aim of which is to facilitate evaluation of IIR systems in a way which is as close as possible to realistic IR processes. The experimental settings consists of 3 components: (1) the involvement of potential users as test persons; (2) the application of dynamic and individual information needs; and (3) the use of multidimensionsal and dynamic relevance judgements. Hidden under the information need component is the essential central sub-component, the simulated work task situation, the tool that triggers the (simulated) dynamic information need. This paper also reports on the empirical findings of the meta-evaluation of the application of this sub-component, the purpose of which is to discover whether the application of simulated work task situations to future evaluation of IIR systems can be recommended. Investigations are carried out to dertermine whether any search behavioural differences exist between test persons' treatment of their own real information needs versus simulated information needs. The hypothesis is that if no difference exist one can correctly substitute real information needs with simulated information needs through the application of simulated work task situations. The empirical results of the meta-evaluation provide positive evidence for the application of simulated work task situations to the evaluation of IIR systems. The results also indicate that tailoring work task situations to the group of test persons is important in motivating them. Furthermore, the results of the evaluation show that different versions of semantic openness of the simulated situations make no difference to the test persons' search treatment
  9. Lazonder, A.W.; Biemans, H.J.A.; Wopereis, I.G.J.H.: Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web (2000) 0.00
    0.004371658 = product of:
      0.017486632 = sum of:
        0.017486632 = weight(_text_:information in 4598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017486632 = score(doc=4598,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 4598, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4598)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Searching for information on the WWW basically comes down to locating an appropriate Web site and to retrieving relevant information from that site. This study examined the effect of a user's WWW experience on both phases of the search process. 35 students from 2 schools for Dutch pre-university education were observed while performing 3 search tasks. The results indicate that subjects with WWW-experience are more proficient in locating Web sites than are novice WWW-users. The observed differences were ascribed to the experts' superior skills in operating Web search engines. However, on tasks that required subjects to locate information on specific Web sites, the performance of experienced and novice users was equivalent - a result that is in line with hypertext research. Based on these findings, implications for training and supporting students in searching for information on the WWW are identified. Finally, the role of the subjects' level of domain expertise is discussed and directions for future research are proposed
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.6, S.576-581
  10. Foster, A.; Ford, N.: Serendipity and information seeking : an empirical study (2003) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Wilbur, W.J.: Global term weights for document retrieval learned from TREC data (2001) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 27(2001) no.5, S.303-310
  12. Hersh, W.R.; Over, P.: Interactivity at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) (2001) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.365-367
  13. Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.369-381
  14. Voorhees, E.M.: Variations in relevance judgements and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness (2000) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 8710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=8710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 8710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8710)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.5, S.697-716
  15. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC test collections (2005) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  16. Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation (2005) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  17. Voiskunskii, V.G.: Evaluation of search results (2000) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
  18. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC ad hoc experiments (2005) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  19. Rao, A.; Lu, A.; Meier, E.; Ahmed, S.; Pliske, D.: Query processing in TREC6 (2000) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 6420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=6420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6420)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.179-186
  20. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36

Types

  • a 105
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…