Search (71 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Belkin, N.J.; Cabezas, A.; Cool, C.; Kim, K.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.; Pressman, R.; Rieh, S.; Savage, P.; Xie, H.: Rutgers interactive track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01
    0.011064345 = product of:
      0.055321723 = sum of:
        0.055321723 = weight(_text_:21 in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055321723 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.3422761 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 21:05:52
  2. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.01
    0.00989625 = product of:
      0.04948125 = sum of:
        0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948125 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  3. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.01
    0.00989625 = product of:
      0.04948125 = sum of:
        0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948125 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
  4. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.01
    0.00989625 = product of:
      0.04948125 = sum of:
        0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948125 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22
  5. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.01
    0.00989625 = product of:
      0.04948125 = sum of:
        0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948125 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
  6. Brown, M.E.: By any other name : accounting for failure in the naming of subject categories (1995) 0.01
    0.00989625 = product of:
      0.04948125 = sum of:
        0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948125 = score(doc=5598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2.11.1996 13:08:22
  7. Tonta, Y.: Analysis of search failures in document retrieval systems : a review (1992) 0.01
    0.008851476 = product of:
      0.04425738 = sum of:
        0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 4611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04425738 = score(doc=4611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 4611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4611)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7.11.1996 21:51:27
  8. Keen, E.M.; Hartley, R.J.: Phrase processing in text retrieval (1994) 0.01
    0.008851476 = product of:
      0.04425738 = sum of:
        0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 1316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04425738 = score(doc=1316,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 1316, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1316)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    After introducing types of records, queries and text processing options, the features needed in software for phrase processing are identified and different approaches in current text retrieval research in the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) projects are enumerated. Then follow eight observations on issues in phrase searching relating both to practice and to research, giving the authors' selection of crucial and controversial issues, supported by 21 references
  9. ¬The Sixth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-6) (1998) 0.01
    0.008851476 = product of:
      0.04425738 = sum of:
        0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04425738 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 6th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 19-21, 1997. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. 51 research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  10. Voorhees, E.M.: Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) (2009) 0.01
    0.008851476 = product of:
      0.04425738 = sum of:
        0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04425738 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:31:21
  11. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.01
    0.0084825 = product of:
      0.0424125 = sum of:
        0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0424125 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
  12. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01
    0.0084825 = product of:
      0.0424125 = sum of:
        0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0424125 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  13. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.01
    0.0084825 = product of:
      0.0424125 = sum of:
        0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0424125 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  14. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.01
    0.0084825 = product of:
      0.0424125 = sum of:
        0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0424125 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  15. Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996) 0.01
    0.007745042 = product of:
      0.03872521 = sum of:
        0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03872521 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 20:21:59
  16. Schamber, L.; Bateman, J.: User criteria in relevance evaluation : toward development of a measurement scale (1996) 0.01
    0.007745042 = product of:
      0.03872521 = sum of:
        0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 7351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03872521 = score(doc=7351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 7351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7351)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  17. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: ¬A comparative approach to system evaluation : delegating control of retrieval tests to an experimental online system (1996) 0.01
    0.007745042 = product of:
      0.03872521 = sum of:
        0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 7435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03872521 = score(doc=7435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 7435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7435)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  18. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Users' partial relevance judgements during online searching (1997) 0.01
    0.007745042 = product of:
      0.03872521 = sum of:
        0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03872521 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 21(1997) no.5, S.271-280
  19. Peritz, B.C.: On the informativeness of titles (1984) 0.01
    0.007745042 = product of:
      0.03872521 = sum of:
        0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03872521 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The frequency of non-informative titles of journal articles was assessed for two fields: library and information science and sociology. The percentage of non informative titles was 21% in the formaer and 15% in the latter. In both fields, the non-informative titles, were concentratein only a few journals. The non-informative titles in library science were derived mainly from non-research journals. IN sociology the reasons for non-informative titles may be more complex; some of these journals are highly cited. For the improvement of retrievaleffiency the adoption of a policy encouraging informative titles (as in journals of chemistry) is recommended.
  20. Salampasis, M.; Tait, J.; Bloor, C.: Evaluation of information-seeking performance in hypermedia digital libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.007745042 = product of:
      0.03872521 = sum of:
        0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03872521 = score(doc=3759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    18. 3.1997 21:11:33

Types

  • a 65
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…