Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Carrier, E.J.: Fiction in public libraries 1900-1950 (1985) 0.00
    0.0034815238 = product of:
      0.034815237 = sum of:
        0.025397355 = weight(_text_:der in 5824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025397355 = score(doc=5824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 5824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5824)
        0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 5824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00941788 = score(doc=5824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5824)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Footnote
    Zur Frage der Aufstellung: S.195ff.
  2. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    9.752656E-4 = product of:
      0.01950531 = sum of:
        0.01950531 = product of:
          0.03901062 = sum of:
            0.03901062 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03901062 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  3. Alternative arrangement : new approaches to public library stock (1982) 0.00
    5.2647555E-4 = product of:
      0.010529511 = sum of:
        0.010529511 = weight(_text_:in in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010529511 = score(doc=1774,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ASTIN, J.: Cheshire: Alternative arrangement and beyond; READER, D.: User orientation in a Hertfordshire branch; CHANDLER, D.: Self-service-libraries: providing for the smaller community in Cambridgeshire; BETTS, D.: Reader interest categories in Surrey; DONBROSKI, L.: Categorisation at East Sussex County Library; McCARTHY, A.: Burning issues: stock appeal in Sunderland; MORSON, I. u. M. PERRY: Two-tier and total: stock arrangement in Brent
  4. Fiction in libraries (1986) 0.00
    5.097578E-4 = product of:
      0.010195156 = sum of:
        0.010195156 = weight(_text_:in in 7462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010195156 = score(doc=7462,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 7462, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7462)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    LCSH
    Fiction in libraries / Great Britain
    Subject
    Fiction in libraries / Great Britain
  5. Agger, S.; Jenson, H.: ¬The Book House : Visual Design (1989) 0.00
    4.1203224E-4 = product of:
      0.008240645 = sum of:
        0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008240645 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International Classification 18(1991) S.233-235 (C. Begthol)
  6. Jennings, B.; Sear, L.: How readers select fiction : a survey in Kent (1986) 0.00
    4.1203224E-4 = product of:
      0.008240645 = sum of:
        0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008240645 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
  7. Harrell, G.; Harrell, E.G.: ¬The classification and organisation of adult fiction in large American public libraries (1985) 0.00
    4.0780622E-4 = product of:
      0.0081561245 = sum of:
        0.0081561245 = weight(_text_:in in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0081561245 = score(doc=5825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Ways of classifying adult fiction vary from library to library in the absence of a standard or universal system. Describes a questionnaire survey of 67 libraries which attempted to identify the various method used by libraries in classifying, arranging and displaying their adult fiction collections. Stresses the need for an evaluation of the methods used and to explore user needs, genre categories, and techniques used by bookstores
  8. Sapp, G.: ¬The levels of access : subject approaches to fiction (1986) 0.00
    3.5683042E-4 = product of:
      0.0071366085 = sum of:
        0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 5823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071366085 = score(doc=5823,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5823, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5823)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the popularity of fiction in libraries, little has been done to analyse systematically the criteria that fiction readers use when selecting books. Describes and evaluates several fiction sclassification systems from the perspective of how well they answer likely reader queries regarding the subject of a novel. Examines the 2-faceted 'levels-of-access' concept that is the common point of reference in all comparisons. Discusses classification schemes in terms of theri utility for browsing, subject headings for card catalogues, and printed indexes. Also discusses the provision of multifaceted subject access through on-line fiction cataloguing. Suggests further investigation of levels of access
  9. Beghtol, C.: Access to fiction : A problem in classification theory and practice. Pt.1-2 (1989-90) 0.00
    3.531705E-4 = product of:
      0.00706341 = sum of:
        0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00706341 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
  10. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The Book House : Modelling user's needs and search strategies as a basis for system design (1989) 0.00
    3.531705E-4 = product of:
      0.00706341 = sum of:
        0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00706341 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International Classification 18(1991) S.233-235 (C. Beghtol)
  11. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The "BOOKHOUSE" : an icon based database system for fiction retrieval in public libraries (1989) 0.00
    3.531705E-4 = product of:
      0.00706341 = sum of:
        0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 1445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00706341 = score(doc=1445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1445)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
  12. Goodstein, L.P.; Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The Book House : System functionality and evaluation (1989) 0.00
    3.531705E-4 = product of:
      0.00706341 = sum of:
        0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 7626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00706341 = score(doc=7626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 7626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7626)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International Classification 18(1991) S. 233-235 (C. Beghtol)
  13. Bradley, P.: Indexes to works of fiction : the views of producers and users on the need for them (1989) 0.00
    3.3297235E-4 = product of:
      0.006659447 = sum of:
        0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006659447 = score(doc=5816,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Over many years there have been occasionally items in The Indexer on the question of whatever fiction needs to be indexed. An attempt is made here to bring together the views of authors, publishers, reviewers, readers, literary societies and indexers in order to see what the various groups of fiction users think of the matter
  14. Harrell, G.: ¬The classification and organization of adult fiction in larger American public libraries (1985) 0.00
    3.3297235E-4 = product of:
      0.006659447 = sum of:
        0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 5829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006659447 = score(doc=5829,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5829, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5829)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Because classification of fiction has posed a dilemma for librarians for many years, the author conducted a survey of the classification practices of larger llibrary systems in the United States. The majority of libraries physically separate adult fiction from adult nonfiction. A large percentage of libraries use genre categorization to arrange a part of their fiction collection. The author concludes: "We now know what we are doing, but are we sure of the whys?"
  15. Shepherd, G.W.; Baker, S.L.: Fiction classification : a brief review of the research (1987) 0.00
    2.9430876E-4 = product of:
      0.005886175 = sum of:
        0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005886175 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    A literature survey regarding fiction classification in US public libraries indicated that classifying fiction helps users to find the type of book they want. Questions not yet answered by research, including the number of categories of genre subdivisions needed, are noted.
  16. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.00
    2.0601612E-4 = product of:
      0.0041203224 = sum of:
        0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041203224 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments