Search (39 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  1. Rafferty, P.: Genre theory, knowledge organisation and fiction 0.01
    0.007508848 = product of:
      0.03754424 = sum of:
        0.03754424 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03754424 = score(doc=3541,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Where the institutionalised study of literature goes, knowledge organisation (KO) approaches to fictional works tend to follow. At the level of generic labelling and categorisation, theoretical conventions of the professional literary critical world appear to be adopted by the information science world, for example in the generic categorisation undertaken by the British National Bibliography. This paper, which is concerned with the epistemological assumptions underpinning fiction categorisation, explores current genre theory and argues for an approach to the understanding of genre, and ultimately the description of genre, that is based on a cultural-materialist, historical world-view. In addition, a novel framework for a genre mapping KO tool is described. Fiction information retrieval is still a fairly underdeveloped area of information science. There have been some developments, mainly in the 1980s and 1990s, which focused on user warrant as the basis for developing retrieval systems (e.g. Pejtersen 1992) but there is still space for a generic approach which can identify and describe novels at a micro-level while situating them within a broader systems view. In the current information retrieval context, any such tool, which would be developed for web use, should incorporate both informational fields and affective dimension indexing in the form of user derived tagging.
  2. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A framework for indexing and representation of information based on work domain analysis : a fiction classification example (1994) 0.01
    0.0073571387 = product of:
      0.036785692 = sum of:
        0.036785692 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036785692 = score(doc=5838,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval and exploration of work domains through databases and integrated information systems has become increasingly important in many modern work settings (as well as in libraries). The problem space of the users is defined on occasion by the dynamically changing requirements from their tasks and goals. it is argued that IR system design should be based on an analysis of the properties of the work domain, the task situation and the user characteristics. The paper describes a general framework for IR system design that has been used in the design of a library system. A special problem identified from use of the framework in domain analysis of fiction retrieval is treated in more detail: mapping the authors' domain structures to the domain structures expressed in users' needs in indexing and representation of fiction
  3. Bell, H.: On the indexability of butterflies (1992) 0.01
    0.0069363764 = product of:
      0.034681883 = sum of:
        0.034681883 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034681883 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Most publishers, who are cost-conscious, and the majority of authors, who are creativity-conscious, oppos indexes for fiction. However, maintains, that there is a case to be made for the indexing of serious fiction, whose readers have the same needs for information retrieval with regard to characters, places and events, as readers of biographies and histories
  4. Saarti, J.: Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons (2002) 0.01
    0.0069363764 = product of:
      0.034681883 = sum of:
        0.034681883 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034681883 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the consistency of fiction indexing of library professionals and patrons based on an empirical test. Indexing was carried out with a Finnish fictional thesaurus and all of the test persons indexed the same five novels. The consistency of indexing was determined to be low; several reasons are postulated. Also an algorithm for typified indexing of fiction is given as well as some suggestions for the development of fiction information retrieval systems and content representation.
  5. Pejtersen, A.M.: New model for multimedia interface to online public access catalogues (1992) 0.01
    0.00606933 = product of:
      0.030346649 = sum of:
        0.030346649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030346649 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Book House is an interactive, multimedia, online public access catalogue designed to support casual, novice users in information retrieval. It uses icons, text and animation in the display interface in order to enhance the utility of the system. A prerequisite for the design of The Book House was a cognitive analysis of users' information needs and search queries. The paper describes The BookHouse and discusses its relevance as a solution to the current OPAC developments
  6. Saarti, J.: Taxonomy of novel abstracts : based on empirical findings (2000) 0.01
    0.00606933 = product of:
      0.030346649 = sum of:
        0.030346649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030346649 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines the content description of fictional works, specifically novels. The data for the empirical part of the study was gathered in Finnish public libraries. The aim of the study is to find out how library clients and library professionals of public libraries describe novels by abstracting them - what are differences in their characterisations and what are the similarities between their abstracts. Also, a taxonomy of novel abstracts is given. The abstracts are classified into four categories in the taxonomy: plot or thematic abstracts, cultural-historical abstracts, subjective or personal abstracts and critical abstracts. In the final portion of the paper, a model for a search and retrieval system for fiction is presented.
  7. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.01
    0.00606933 = product of:
      0.030346649 = sum of:
        0.030346649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030346649 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  8. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.01
    0.005810003 = product of:
      0.029050013 = sum of:
        0.029050013 = product of:
          0.058100026 = sum of:
            0.058100026 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058100026 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  9. Green, R.: ¬The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities (1997) 0.01
    0.0052022827 = product of:
      0.026011413 = sum of:
        0.026011413 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026011413 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Develops a framework for evaluating the indexing needs of the humanities with reference to 4 set of contrasts: user-oriented vs. document oriented indexing; subject indexing vs. attribute indexing; scientific writing vs. humanistic writing; and topical relevance vs. logical relevance vs. evidential relevance vs. aesthetic relevance. The indexing needs of the humanities range broadly across these contrasts. Established the centrality of relationship to the communication of indexable matter and examines the advantages and disadvantages of means used for their expression in both natural languages and index languages. The use of a relational structure, such as a frame, is shown to represent perhaps the best available option. Illustrates where the use of relational structures in humanities indexing would help meet some of the needs previously identified. The adoption of frame-based indexing in the humanities might substantially improve the retrieval of its literature
  10. Kreider, L.J.: LCSH works! : Subject searching effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings through cooperation (2000) 0.01
    0.0052022827 = product of:
      0.026011413 = sum of:
        0.026011413 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026011413 = score(doc=6576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  11. Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021) 0.01
    0.0052022827 = product of:
      0.026011413 = sum of:
        0.026011413 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026011413 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In traditional classification, fictional works are indexed only by their form, genre, and language, while their subject content is believed to be irrelevant. However, recent research suggests that this may not be the best approach. We tested indexing of a small sample of selected fictional works by Integrative Levels Classification (ILC2), a freely faceted system based on phenomena instead of disciplines and considered the structure of the resulting classmarks. Issues in the process of subject analysis, such as selection of relevant vs. non-relevant themes and citation order of relevant ones, are identified and discussed. Some phenomena that are covered in scholarly literature can also be identified as relevant themes in fictional literature and expressed in classmarks. This can allow for hybrid search and retrieval systems covering both fiction and nonfiction, which will result in better leveraging of the knowledge contained in fictional works.
  12. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.00
    0.004648002 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = product of:
          0.04648002 = sum of:
            0.04648002 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04648002 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  13. Wordell, C.B.: Tales of the town of dreamy dreams : a bibliography of fiction set in New Orleans (1998) 0.00
    0.004648002 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = product of:
          0.04648002 = sum of:
            0.04648002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04648002 = score(doc=1636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:06:22
  14. Denham, D.: Back to basics : training and education opportunities for the exploitation of fiction in public libraries (1996) 0.00
    0.004648002 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = product of:
          0.04648002 = sum of:
            0.04648002 = weight(_text_:22 in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04648002 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:18:22
  15. Weaver, M.: Contextual metadata: faceted schemas in virtual library communities (2007) 0.00
    0.0043352353 = product of:
      0.021676177 = sum of:
        0.021676177 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021676177 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the information needs of one user group, public library fiction readers, in order to reveal a design of an online community at the local level. Examination of user-generated metadata can reveal new approaches to information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review into behaviors of virtual communities; surveying public library readers regarding search behavior characteristics - the survey included a sample "tagging" exercise to determine whether public library communities could create meaningful metadata for retrieval purposes. Findings - The use of relevance as an indicator of tag quality is flawed: in a survey, public library readers "tagged" the novel The Da Vinci Code. The resulting collection of tags provided a richer description of the book than did the social book-related web site www.librarything.com. Tag collections can be broken down into different categories, each reflecting a different "facet" of the novel: character, plot, subject/topic, setting, and genre. Faceted structure to tags enables users to choose the context of the tag to the novel. Research limitations/implications - This research is relevant in the world of social networking sites, online communities, or any other such system where users generate descriptive metadata. Examination of such metadata can reveal facets, which can guide the architect/librarian in the design of a versatile architecture. Originality/value - This research resulted in a manifold design for a public-library-based online community that allowed for the full expression of users' information needs. This research introduces a faceted structure to current approaches for user-generated metadata, adding versatility to search terms.
  16. Saarti, J.: Fictional literature : classification and indexing (2019) 0.00
    0.0043352353 = product of:
      0.021676177 = sum of:
        0.021676177 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021676177 = score(doc=5315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5315)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Fiction content analysis and retrieval are interesting specific topics for two major reasons: 1) the extensive use of fictional works; and, 2) the multimodality and interpretational nature of fiction. The primary challenge in the analysis of fictional content is that there is no single meaning to be analysed; the analysis is an ongoing process involving an interaction between the text produced by author, the reader and the society in which the interaction occurs. Furthermore, different audiences have specific needs to be taken into consideration. This article explores the topic of fiction knowledge organization, including both classification and indexing. It provides a broad and analytical overview of the literature as well as describing several experimental approaches and developmental projects for the analysis of fictional content. Traditional fiction indexing has been mainly based on the factual aspects of the work; this has then been expanded to handle different aspects of the fictional work. There have been attempts made to develop vocabularies for fiction indexing. All the major classification schemes use the genre and language/culture of fictional works when subdividing fictional works into subclasses. The evolution of shelf classification of fiction and the appearance of different types of digital tools have revolutionized the classification of fiction, making it possible to integrate both indexing and classification of fictional works.
  17. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.00
    0.0040670014 = product of:
      0.020335007 = sum of:
        0.020335007 = product of:
          0.040670015 = sum of:
            0.040670015 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040670015 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  18. Saarti, J.: Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri (1999) 0.00
    0.0040670014 = product of:
      0.020335007 = sum of:
        0.020335007 = product of:
          0.040670015 = sum of:
            0.040670015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040670015 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  19. MacEwan, A.: Promoting fiction through the catalogue (1997) 0.00
    0.0040670014 = product of:
      0.020335007 = sum of:
        0.020335007 = product of:
          0.040670015 = sum of:
            0.040670015 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040670015 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042882618 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Librarians world. 6(1997) no.2, S.22-24