Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.02
    0.02138706 = product of:
      0.04277412 = sum of:
        0.04277412 = sum of:
          0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00616747 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.036606647 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036606647 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
    Language
    e
  2. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.02
    0.017733382 = product of:
      0.035466764 = sum of:
        0.035466764 = sum of:
          0.00801178 = weight(_text_:e in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00801178 = score(doc=2024,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.16503859 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
          0.027454983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027454983 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  3. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.02
    0.016040293 = product of:
      0.032080587 = sum of:
        0.032080587 = sum of:
          0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0046256026 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.027454983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027454983 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  4. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.01
    0.014484272 = product of:
      0.028968545 = sum of:
        0.028968545 = sum of:
          0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003083735 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.025884809 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025884809 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01
    0.01416524 = product of:
      0.02833048 = sum of:
        0.02833048 = sum of:
          0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005451325 = score(doc=4553,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.022879155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022879155 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01
    Language
    e
  6. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.01
    0.01069353 = product of:
      0.02138706 = sum of:
        0.02138706 = sum of:
          0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003083735 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.018303324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018303324 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Language
    e
  7. McGuinness, D.L.: Ontologies come of age (2003) 0.00
    0.0016691206 = product of:
      0.0033382413 = sum of:
        0.0033382413 = product of:
          0.0066764825 = sum of:
            0.0066764825 = weight(_text_:e in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066764825 = score(doc=3084,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies have moved beyond the domains of library science, philosophy, and knowledge representation. They are now the concerns of marketing departments, CEOs, and mainstream business. Research analyst companies such as Forrester Research report on the critical roles of ontologies in support of browsing and search for e-commerce and in support of interoperability for facilitation of knowledge management and configuration. One now sees ontologies used as central controlled vocabularies that are integrated into catalogues, databases, web publications, knowledge management applications, etc. Large ontologies are essential components in many online applications including search (such as Yahoo and Lycos), e-commerce (such as Amazon and eBay), configuration (such as Dell and PC-Order), etc. One also sees ontologies that have long life spans, sometimes in multiple projects (such as UMLS, SIC codes, etc.). Such diverse usage generates many implications for ontology environments. In this paper, we will discuss ontologies and requirements in their current instantiations on the web today. We will describe some desirable properties of ontologies. We will also discuss how both simple and complex ontologies are being and may be used to support varied applications. We will conclude with a discussion of emerging trends in ontologies and their environments and briefly mention our evolving ontology evolution environment.
    Language
    e
  8. Lassalle, E.; Lassalle, E.: Semantic models in information retrieval (2012) 0.00
    0.0016691206 = product of:
      0.0033382413 = sum of:
        0.0033382413 = product of:
          0.0066764825 = sum of:
            0.0066764825 = weight(_text_:e in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066764825 = score(doc=97,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  9. Uren, V.; Cimiano, P.; Iria, J.; Handschuh, S.; Vargas-Vera, M.; Motta, E.; Ciravegnac, F.: Semantic annotation for knowledge management : requirements and a survey of the state of the art (2006) 0.00
    0.0016353976 = product of:
      0.003270795 = sum of:
        0.003270795 = product of:
          0.00654159 = sum of:
            0.00654159 = weight(_text_:e in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00654159 = score(doc=229,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  10. Davies, J.; Fensel, D.; Harmelen, F. van: Conclusions: ontology-driven knowledge management : towards the Semantic Web? (2004) 0.00
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = product of:
          0.00616747 = sum of:
            0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00616747 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  11. Allocca, C.; Aquin, M.d'; Motta, E.: Impact of using relationships between ontologies to enhance the ontology search results (2012) 0.00
    0.0013628312 = product of:
      0.0027256624 = sum of:
        0.0027256624 = product of:
          0.005451325 = sum of:
            0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005451325 = score(doc=264,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 264, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Gómez-Pérez, A.; Corcho, O.: Ontology languages for the Semantic Web (2015) 0.00
    0.0013628312 = product of:
      0.0027256624 = sum of:
        0.0027256624 = product of:
          0.005451325 = sum of:
            0.005451325 = weight(_text_:e in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005451325 = score(doc=3297,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies have proven to be an essential element in many applications. They are used in agent systems, knowledge management systems, and e-commerce platforms. They can also generate natural language, integrate intelligent information, provide semantic-based access to the Internet, and extract information from texts in addition to being used in many other applications to explicitly declare the knowledge embedded in them. However, not only are ontologies useful for applications in which knowledge plays a key role, but they can also trigger a major change in current Web contents. This change is leading to the third generation of the Web-known as the Semantic Web-which has been defined as "the conceptual structuring of the Web in an explicit machine-readable way."1 This definition does not differ too much from the one used for defining an ontology: "An ontology is an explicit, machinereadable specification of a shared conceptualization."2 In fact, new ontology-based applications and knowledge architectures are developing for this new Web. A common claim for all of these approaches is the need for languages to represent the semantic information that this Web requires-solving the heterogeneous data exchange in this heterogeneous environment. Here, we don't decide which language is best of the Semantic Web. Rather, our goal is to help developers find the most suitable language for their representation needs. The authors analyze the most representative ontology languages created for the Web and compare them using a common framework.
    Language
    e
  13. Miles, A.; Pérez-Agüera, J.R.: SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web (2006) 0.00
    0.001349134 = product of:
      0.002698268 = sum of:
        0.002698268 = product of:
          0.005396536 = sum of:
            0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005396536 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Fensel, D.; Staab, S.; Studer, R.; Harmelen, F. van; Davies, J.: ¬A future perspective : exploiting peer-to-peer and the Semantic Web for knowledge management (2004) 0.00
    0.001349134 = product of:
      0.002698268 = sum of:
        0.002698268 = product of:
          0.005396536 = sum of:
            0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005396536 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  15. Scheir, P.; Pammer, V.; Lindstaedt, S.N.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : does it exist? (2007) 0.00
    0.001349134 = product of:
      0.002698268 = sum of:
        0.002698268 = product of:
          0.005396536 = sum of:
            0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005396536 = score(doc=4329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  16. Pattuelli, M.C.; Rubinow, S.: Charting DBpedia : towards a cartography of a major linked dataset (2012) 0.00
    0.001349134 = product of:
      0.002698268 = sum of:
        0.002698268 = product of:
          0.005396536 = sum of:
            0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005396536 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  17. Corcho, O.; Poveda-Villalón, M.; Gómez-Pérez, A.: Ontology engineering in the era of linked data (2015) 0.00
    0.001349134 = product of:
      0.002698268 = sum of:
        0.002698268 = product of:
          0.005396536 = sum of:
            0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005396536 = score(doc=3293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  18. Lukasiewicz, T.: Uncertainty reasoning for the Semantic Web (2017) 0.00
    0.001349134 = product of:
      0.002698268 = sum of:
        0.002698268 = product of:
          0.005396536 = sum of:
            0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005396536 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  19. Wang, H.; Liu, Q.; Penin, T.; Fu, L.; Zhang, L.; Tran, T.; Yu, Y.; Pan, Y.: Semplore: a scalable IR approach to search the Web of Data (2009) 0.00
    0.0011564007 = product of:
      0.0023128013 = sum of:
        0.0023128013 = product of:
          0.0046256026 = sum of:
            0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0046256026 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  20. Suchanek, F.M.; Kasneci, G.; Weikum, G.: YAGO: a large ontology from Wikipedia and WordNet (2008) 0.00
    0.0011564007 = product of:
      0.0023128013 = sum of:
        0.0023128013 = product of:
          0.0046256026 = sum of:
            0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0046256026 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e

Years

Types