Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.10
    0.0987719 = product of:
      0.1975438 = sum of:
        0.04938595 = product of:
          0.14815785 = sum of:
            0.14815785 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14815785 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3954264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14815785 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14815785 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3954264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04664141 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  2. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.02
    0.023378028 = product of:
      0.046756055 = sum of:
        0.03411752 = weight(_text_:reference in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03411752 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04664141 = queryNorm
            0.17979822 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
        0.012638534 = product of:
          0.025277069 = sum of:
            0.025277069 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025277069 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Ontologies are prone to wide semantic variability due to subjective points of view of their composers. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new approach for maximal unification of diverse ontologies for controversial domains by their relations. Design/methodology/approach - Effective matching or unification of multiple ontologies for a specific domain is crucial for the success of many semantic web applications, such as semantic information retrieval and organization, document tagging, summarization and search. To this end, numerous automatic and semi-automatic techniques were proposed in the past decade that attempt to identify similar entities, mostly classes, in diverse ontologies for similar domains. Apparently, matching individual entities cannot result in full integration of ontologies' semantics without matching their inter-relations with all other-related classes (and instances). However, semantic matching of ontological relations still constitutes a major research challenge. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose a new paradigm for assessment of maximal possible matching and unification of ontological relations. To this end, several unification rules for ontological relations were devised based on ontological reference rules, and lexical and textual entailment. These rules were semi-automatically implemented to extend a given ontology with semantically matching relations from another ontology for a similar domain. Then, the ontologies were unified through these similar pairs of relations. The authors observe that these rules can be also facilitated to reveal the contradictory relations in different ontologies. Findings - To assess the feasibility of the approach two experiments were conducted with different sets of multiple personal ontologies on controversial domains constructed by trained subjects. The results for about 50 distinct ontology pairs demonstrate a good potential of the methodology for increasing inter-ontology agreement. Furthermore, the authors show that the presented methodology can lead to a complete unification of multiple semantically heterogeneous ontologies. Research limitations/implications - This is a conceptual study that presents a new approach for semantic unification of ontologies by a devised set of rules along with the initial experimental evidence of its feasibility and effectiveness. However, this methodology has to be fully automatically implemented and tested on a larger dataset in future research. Practical implications - This result has implication for semantic search, since a richer ontology, comprised of multiple aspects and viewpoints of the domain of knowledge, enhances discoverability and improves search results. Originality/value - To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study to examine and assess the maximal level of semantic relation-based ontology unification.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004) 0.02
    0.02110914 = product of:
      0.08443656 = sum of:
        0.08443656 = weight(_text_:reference in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08443656 = score(doc=4684,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04664141 = queryNorm
            0.4449779 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.
  4. SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference : W3C Recommendation 18 August 2009 (2009) 0.02
    0.018093549 = product of:
      0.072374195 = sum of:
        0.072374195 = weight(_text_:reference in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072374195 = score(doc=4688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04664141 = queryNorm
            0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  5. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.02
    0.015882768 = product of:
      0.06353107 = sum of:
        0.06353107 = sum of:
          0.027783897 = weight(_text_:services in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027783897 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04664141 = queryNorm
              0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.035747174 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035747174 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04664141 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  6. Soergel, D.: SemWeb: proposal for an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology (1996) 0.01
    0.010661725 = product of:
      0.0426469 = sum of:
        0.0426469 = weight(_text_:reference in 3575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0426469 = score(doc=3575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04664141 = queryNorm
            0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 3575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3575)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a proposal for the long-range development of an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to many kinds of knowledge about concepts and terminology. The system would draw on existing knowledge bases that are accessible through the Internet or on CD-ROM and on a common integrated distributed knowledge base that would grow incrementally over time. Existing knowledge bases would be accessed througha common interface that would search several knowledge bases, collate the data into a common format, and present them to the user. The common integrated distributed knowldge base would provide an environment in which many contributors could carry out classification and terminological projects more efficiently, with the results available in a common format. Over time, data from other knowledge bases could be incorporated into the common knowledge base, either by actual transfer (provided the knowledge base producers are willing) or by reference through a link. Either way, such incorporation requires intellectual work but allows for tighter integration than common interface access to multiple knowledge bases. Each piece of information in the common knowledge base will have all its sources attached, providing an acknowledgment mechanism that gives due credit to all contributors. The whole system would be designed to be usable by many levels of users for improved information exchange.
  7. Soergel, D.: SemWeb: Proposal for an Open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology : exploration and development of the concept (1996) 0.01
    0.010661725 = product of:
      0.0426469 = sum of:
        0.0426469 = weight(_text_:reference in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0426469 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04664141 = queryNorm
            0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a proposal for the long-range development of an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to many kinds of knowledge about concepts and terminology. The system would draw on existing knowledge bases that are accessible through the Internet or on CD-ROM an on a common integrated distributed knowledge base that would grow incrementally over time. Existing knowledge bases would be accessed through a common interface that would search several knowledge bases, collate the data into a common format, and present them to the user. The common integrated distributed knowledge base would provide an environment in which many contributors could carry out classification and terminological projects more efficiently, with the results available in a common format. Over time, data from other knowledge bases could be incorporated into the common knowledge base, either by actual transfer (provided the knowledge base producers are willing) or by reference through a link. Either way, such incorporation requires intellectual work but allows for tighter integration than common interface access to multiple knowledge bases. Each piece of information in the common knowledge base will have all its sources attached, providing an acknowledgment mechanism that gives due credit to all contributors. The whole system woul be designed to be usable by many levels of users for improved information exchange.
  8. OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements (2004) 0.01
    0.006945974 = product of:
      0.027783897 = sum of:
        0.027783897 = product of:
          0.055567794 = sum of:
            0.055567794 = weight(_text_:services in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055567794 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This document specifies usage scenarios, goals and requirements for a web ontology language. An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management.
  9. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01
    0.006319267 = product of:
      0.025277069 = sum of:
        0.025277069 = product of:
          0.050554138 = sum of:
            0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050554138 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  10. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.006319267 = product of:
      0.025277069 = sum of:
        0.025277069 = product of:
          0.050554138 = sum of:
            0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050554138 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  11. Miles, A.; Pérez-Agüera, J.R.: SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web (2006) 0.01
    0.006077728 = product of:
      0.024310911 = sum of:
        0.024310911 = product of:
          0.048621822 = sum of:
            0.048621822 = weight(_text_:services in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048621822 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article introduces the Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS), a Semantic Web language for representing controlled structured vocabularies, including thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading systems and taxonomies. SKOS provides a framework for publishing thesauri, classification schemes, and subject indexes on the Web, and for applying these systems to resource collections that are part of the SemanticWeb. SemanticWeb applications may harvest and merge SKOS data, to integrate and enhances retrieval service across multiple collections (e.g. libraries). This article also describes some alternatives for integrating Semantic Web services based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and SKOS into a distributed enterprise architecture.
  12. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.01
    0.0055293585 = product of:
      0.022117434 = sum of:
        0.022117434 = product of:
          0.04423487 = sum of:
            0.04423487 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04423487 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  13. Wang, H.; Liu, Q.; Penin, T.; Fu, L.; Zhang, L.; Tran, T.; Yu, Y.; Pan, Y.: Semplore: a scalable IR approach to search the Web of Data (2009) 0.01
    0.005209481 = product of:
      0.020837924 = sum of:
        0.020837924 = product of:
          0.041675847 = sum of:
            0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041675847 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web. 7(2009) no.3, S.177-188
  14. Suchanek, F.M.; Kasneci, G.; Weikum, G.: YAGO: a large ontology from Wikipedia and WordNet (2008) 0.01
    0.005209481 = product of:
      0.020837924 = sum of:
        0.020837924 = product of:
          0.041675847 = sum of:
            0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041675847 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web. 6(2008) no.3, S.203-217
  15. Uren, V.; Cimiano, P.; Iria, J.; Handschuh, S.; Vargas-Vera, M.; Motta, E.; Ciravegnac, F.: Semantic annotation for knowledge management : requirements and a survey of the state of the art (2006) 0.01
    0.005209481 = product of:
      0.020837924 = sum of:
        0.020837924 = product of:
          0.041675847 = sum of:
            0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041675847 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web. 4(2006) no.1, S.14-28
  16. ¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.01
    0.005209481 = product of:
      0.020837924 = sum of:
        0.020837924 = product of:
          0.041675847 = sum of:
            0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041675847 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.
  17. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.00
    0.0047394503 = product of:
      0.018957801 = sum of:
        0.018957801 = product of:
          0.037915602 = sum of:
            0.037915602 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037915602 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  18. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.00
    0.0047394503 = product of:
      0.018957801 = sum of:
        0.018957801 = product of:
          0.037915602 = sum of:
            0.037915602 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037915602 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  19. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.00
    0.0047394503 = product of:
      0.018957801 = sum of:
        0.018957801 = product of:
          0.037915602 = sum of:
            0.037915602 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037915602 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  20. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.00
    0.003949542 = product of:
      0.015798168 = sum of:
        0.015798168 = product of:
          0.031596337 = sum of:
            0.031596337 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031596337 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04664141 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01