Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013) 0.06
    0.060742617 = product of:
      0.12148523 = sum of:
        0.12148523 = sum of:
          0.079854384 = weight(_text_:headings in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.079854384 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04163085 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211677 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of Linked Data has made its entrance in the cultural heritage sector due to its potential use for the integration of heterogeneous collections and deriving additional value out of existing metadata. However, practitioners and researchers alike need a better understanding of what outcome they can reasonably expect of the reconciliation process between their local metadata and established controlled vocabularies which are already a part of the Linked Data cloud. This paper offers an in-depth analysis of how a locally developed vocabulary can be successfully reconciled with the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and the Arts and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) through the help of a general-purpose tool for interactive data transformation (OpenRefine). Issues negatively affecting the reconciliation process are identified and solutions are proposed in order to derive maximum value from existing metadata and controlled vocabularies in an automated manner.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:29:20
  2. Ilik, V.: Distributed person data : using Semantic Web compliant data in subject name headings (2015) 0.02
    0.023527324 = product of:
      0.04705465 = sum of:
        0.04705465 = product of:
          0.0941093 = sum of:
            0.0941093 = weight(_text_:headings in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0941093 = score(doc=2292,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.3789019 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Providing efficient access to information is a crucial library mission. Subject classification is one of the major pillars that guarantees the accessibility of records in libraries. In this paper we discuss the need to associate person IDs and URIs with subjects when a named person happens to be the subject of the document. This is often the case with biographies, schools of thought in philosophy, politics, art, and literary criticism. Using Semantic Web compliant data in subject name headings enhances the ability to collocate topics about a person. Also, in retrieval, books about a person would be easily linked to works by that same person. In the context of the Semantic Web, it is expected that, as the available information grows, one would be more effective in the task of information retrieval. Information about a person or, as in the case of this paper, about a researcher exist in various databases, which can be discipline specific or publishers' databases, and in such cases they have an assigned identifier. They also exist in institutional directory databases. We argue that these various databases can be leveraged to support improved discoverability and retrieval of research output for individual authors and institutions, as well as works about those authors.
  3. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.02
    0.017346188 = product of:
      0.034692377 = sum of:
        0.034692377 = product of:
          0.06938475 = sum of:
            0.06938475 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06938475 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  4. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.01
    0.010407712 = product of:
      0.020815425 = sum of:
        0.020815425 = product of:
          0.04163085 = sum of:
            0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04163085 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  5. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01
    0.008673094 = product of:
      0.017346188 = sum of:
        0.017346188 = product of:
          0.034692377 = sum of:
            0.034692377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034692377 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01
  6. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.01
    0.006938475 = product of:
      0.01387695 = sum of:
        0.01387695 = product of:
          0.0277539 = sum of:
            0.0277539 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0277539 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.01
    0.006938475 = product of:
      0.01387695 = sum of:
        0.01387695 = product of:
          0.0277539 = sum of:
            0.0277539 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0277539 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22