Search (39 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.01 
    0.014111074 = product of:
  0.07055537 = sum of:
    0.07055537 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07055537 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  2. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01 
    0.011288859 = product of:
  0.056444295 = sum of:
    0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056444295 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  3. Stamou, G.; Chortaras, A.: Ontological query answering over semantic data (2017) 0.01 
    0.010102809 = product of:
  0.050514046 = sum of:
    0.050514046 = weight(_text_:7 in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050514046 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
  4. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.01 
    0.009877752 = product of:
  0.04938876 = sum of:
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.01 
    0.009877752 = product of:
  0.04938876 = sum of:
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  6. Dunsire, G.: FRBR and the Semantic Web (2012) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.724-741
  7. Lukasiewicz, T.: Uncertainty reasoning for the Semantic Web (2017) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
  8. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  9. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
  10. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:29:20
  11. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  12. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.01 
    0.007982429 = product of:
  0.039912146 = sum of:
    0.039912146 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039912146 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  13. Wang, H.; Liu, Q.; Penin, T.; Fu, L.; Zhang, L.; Tran, T.; Yu, Y.; Pan, Y.: Semplore: a scalable IR approach to search the Web of Data (2009) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web. 7(2009) no.3, S.177-188
  14. Macgregor, G.: Introduction to a special issue on digital libraries and the semantic web : context, applications and research (2008) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=1904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 6.2008 18:36:17
  15. Joint, N.: ¬The practitioner librarian and the semantic web : ANTAEUS (2008) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=2012,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2012, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2012)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 6.2008 18:35:50
  16. LeBoeuf, P.: ¬A strange model named FRBRoo (2012) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=1904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.422-438
  17. Cali, A.: Ontology querying : datalog strikes back (2017) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=3928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
  18. Sequeda, J.F.: Integrating relational databases with the Semantic Web : a reflection (2017) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 3935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=3935,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 3935, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3935)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
  19. Veltman, K.H.: Syntactic and semantic interoperability : new approaches to knowledge and the Semantic Web (2001) 0.01 
    0.0071437657 = product of:
  0.03571883 = sum of:
    0.03571883 = weight(_text_:7 in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03571883 = score(doc=3883,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.20704803 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    At VVWW-7 (Brisbane, 1997), Tim Berners-Lee outlined his vision of a global reasoning web. At VVWW- 8 (Toronto, May 1998), he developed this into a vision of a semantic web, where one Gould search not just for isolated words, but for meaning in the form of logically provable claims. In the past four years this vision has spread with amazing speed. The semantic web has been adopted by the European Commission as one of the important goals of the Sixth Framework Programme. In the United States it has become linked with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). While this quest to achieve a semantic web is new, the quest for meaning in language has a history that is almost as old as language itself. Accordingly this paper opens with a survey of the historical background. The contributions of the Dublin Core are reviewed briefly. To achieve a semantic web requires both syntactic and semantic interoperability. These challenges are outlined. A basic contention of this paper is that semantic interoperability requires much more than a simple agreement concerning the static meaning of a term. Different levels of agreement (local, regional, national and international) are involved and these levels have their own history. Hence, one of the larger challenges is to create new systems of knowledge organization, which identify and connect these different levels. With respect to meaning or semantics, early twentieth century pioneers such as Wüster were hopeful that it might be sufficient to limit oneself to isolated terms and words without reference to the larger grammatical context: to concept systems rather than to propositional logic. While a fascination with concept systems implicitly dominates many contemporary discussions, this paper suggests why this approach is not sufficient. The final section of this paper explores how an approach using propositional logic could lead to a new approach to universals and particulars. This points to a re-organization of knowledge, and opens the way for a vision of a semantic web with all the historical and cultural richness and complexity of language itself.
    Source
    New review of information networking. 7(2001) no.xx, S.xx-xx
  20. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01 
    0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01

Authors

Years

Themes