-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.04
0.040913574 = product of:
0.122740716 = sum of:
0.122740716 = sum of:
0.07376297 = weight(_text_:de in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07376297 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.048977744 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048977744 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
- Editor
- Carroll, J.J. u. J. de Roo
-
Van de Sompel, H.: Thoughts about repositories, use, and re-use (2008)
0.02
0.018440742 = product of:
0.055322222 = sum of:
0.055322222 = product of:
0.110644445 = sum of:
0.110644445 = weight(_text_:de in 4366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110644445 = score(doc=4366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 4366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Vocht, L. De: Exploring semantic relationships in the Web of Data : Semantische relaties verkennen in data op het web (2017)
0.02
0.01635088 = product of:
0.02452632 = sum of:
0.0014753931 = weight(_text_:s in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014753931 = score(doc=4232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.030030979 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
0.023050927 = product of:
0.046101853 = sum of:
0.046101853 = weight(_text_:de in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046101853 = score(doc=4232,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- When we speak about finding relationships between resources, it is necessary to dive deeper in the structure. The graph structure of linked data where the semantics give meaning to the relationships between resources enable the execution of pathfinding algorithms. The assigned weights and heuristics are base components of such algorithms and ultimately define (the order) which resources are included in a path. These paths explain indirect connections between resources. Our third technique proposes an algorithm that optimizes the choice of resources in terms of serendipity. Some optimizations guard the consistence of candidate-paths where the coherence of consecutive connections is maximized to avoid trivial and too arbitrary paths. The implementation uses the A* algorithm, the de-facto reference when it comes to heuristically optimized minimal cost paths. The effectiveness of paths was measured based on common automatic metrics and surveys where the users could indicate their preference for paths, generated each time in a different way. Finally, all our techniques are applied to a use case about publications in digital libraries where they are aligned with information about scientific conferences and researchers. The application to this use case is a practical example because the different aspects of exploratory search come together. In fact, the techniques also evolved from the experiences when implementing the use case. Practical details about the semantic model are explained and the implementation of the search system is clarified module by module. The evaluation positions the result, a prototype of a tool to explore scientific publications, researchers and conferences next to some important alternatives.
- Content
- Proefschrift ingediend tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de ingenieurswetenschappen: computerwetenschappen. Vgl. unter: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319667837_Exploring_semantic_relationships_in_the_web_of_data.
- Pages
- XXV, 184 S
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007)
0.01
0.014285176 = product of:
0.042855527 = sum of:
0.042855527 = product of:
0.085711055 = sum of:
0.085711055 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085711055 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.012244436 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = product of:
0.073466614 = sum of:
0.073466614 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073466614 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007)
0.01
0.012244436 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = product of:
0.073466614 = sum of:
0.073466614 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073466614 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.007142588 = product of:
0.021427764 = sum of:
0.021427764 = product of:
0.042855527 = sum of:
0.042855527 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042855527 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000)
0.01
0.007142588 = product of:
0.021427764 = sum of:
0.021427764 = product of:
0.042855527 = sum of:
0.042855527 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042855527 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11. 5.2013 19:22:18
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.01
0.006122218 = product of:
0.018366653 = sum of:
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Jacobs, I.: From chaos, order: W3C standard helps organize knowledge : SKOS Connects Diverse Knowledge Organization Systems to Linked Data (2009)
0.01
0.0053785495 = product of:
0.016135648 = sum of:
0.016135648 = product of:
0.032271296 = sum of:
0.032271296 = weight(_text_:de in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032271296 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.16618349 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- SKOS Adapts to the Diversity of Knowledge Organization Systems A useful starting point for understanding the role of SKOS is the set of subject headings published by the US Library of Congress (LOC) for categorizing books, videos, and other library resources. These headings can be used to broaden or narrow queries for discovering resources. For instance, one can narrow a query about books on "Chinese literature" to "Chinese drama," or further still to "Chinese children's plays." Library of Congress subject headings have evolved within a community of practice over a period of decades. By now publishing these subject headings in SKOS, the Library of Congress has made them available to the linked data community, which benefits from a time-tested set of concepts to re-use in their own data. This re-use adds value ("the network effect") to the collection. When people all over the Web re-use the same LOC concept for "Chinese drama," or a concept from some other vocabulary linked to it, this creates many new routes to the discovery of information, and increases the chances that relevant items will be found. As an example of mapping one vocabulary to another, a combined effort from the STITCH, TELplus and MACS Projects provides links between LOC concepts and RAMEAU, a collection of French subject headings used by the Bibliothèque Nationale de France and other institutions. SKOS can be used for subject headings but also many other approaches to organizing knowledge. Because different communities are comfortable with different organization schemes, SKOS is designed to port diverse knowledge organization systems to the Web. "Active participation from the library and information science community in the development of SKOS over the past seven years has been key to ensuring that SKOS meets a variety of needs," said Thomas Baker, co-chair of the Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, which published SKOS. "One goal in creating SKOS was to provide new uses for well-established knowledge organization systems by providing a bridge to the linked data cloud." SKOS is part of the Semantic Web technology stack. Like the Web Ontology Language (OWL), SKOS can be used to define vocabularies. But the two technologies were designed to meet different needs. SKOS is a simple language with just a few features, tuned for sharing and linking knowledge organization systems such as thesauri and classification schemes. OWL offers a general and powerful framework for knowledge representation, where additional "rigor" can afford additional benefits (for instance, business rule processing). To get started with SKOS, see the SKOS Primer.
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.01
0.0051018484 = product of:
0.015305545 = sum of:
0.015305545 = product of:
0.03061109 = sum of:
0.03061109 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03061109 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
-
Panzer, M.: Relationships, spaces, and the two faces of Dewey (2008)
0.00
0.0046101855 = product of:
0.013830556 = sum of:
0.013830556 = product of:
0.027661111 = sum of:
0.027661111 = weight(_text_:de in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027661111 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.14244299 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- What are those "other" relationships that Dewey possesses and that seem so important to surface? Firstly, there is the relationship of concepts to resources. Dewey has been used for a long time, and over 200,000 numbers are assigned to information resources each year and added to WorldCat by the Library of Congress and the German National Library alone. Secondly, we have relationships between concepts in the scheme itself. Dewey provides a rich set of non-hierarchical relations, indicating other relevant and related subjects across disciplinary boundaries. Thirdly, perhaps most importantly, there is the relationship between the same concepts across different languages. Dewey has been translated extensively, and current versions are available in French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Briefer representations of the top-three levels (the DDC Summaries) are available in several languages in the DeweyBrowser. This multilingual nature of the scheme allows searchers to access a broader range of resources or to switch the language of--and thus localize--subject metadata seamlessly. MelvilClass, a Dewey front-end developed by the German National Library for the German translation, could be used as a common interface to the DDC in any language, as it is built upon the standard DDC data format. It is not hard to give an example of the basic terminology of a class pulled together in a multilingual way: <class/794.8> a skos:Concept ; skos:notation "794.8"^^ddc:notation ; skos:prefLabel "Computer games"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Computerspiele"@de ; skos:prefLabel "Jeux sur ordinateur"@fr ; skos:prefLabel "Juegos por computador"@es .
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
0.0020443648 = product of:
0.006133094 = sum of:
0.006133094 = weight(_text_:s in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006133094 = score(doc=4640,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Ontologies will play a central role in the development of the Semantic Web. It is unrealistic to assume that such ontologies will be developed from scratch. Rather, we assume that existing resources such as thesauri and lexical data bases will be reused in the development of ontologies for the Semantic Web. In this paper we describe a method for converting existing source material to a representation that is compatible with Semantic Web languages such as RDF(S) and OWL. The method is illustrated with three case studies: converting Wordnet, AAT and MeSH to RDF(S) and OWL.
- Source
- Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS2004), Eds.: C. Bussler, J. Davies, D. Fensel and R. Studer. 2004. S.299-311
-
Kara, S.: ¬An ontology-based retrieval system using semantic indexing (2012)
0.00
0.0020443648 = product of:
0.006133094 = sum of:
0.006133094 = weight(_text_:s in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006133094 = score(doc=3829,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of science in Computer Engineering (XII, 57 S.)
- Source
- Information Systems. 37(2012) no. 4, S.294-305
-
Aslam, S.; Sonkar, S.K.: Semantic Web : an overview (2019)
0.00
0.0015737525 = product of:
0.0047212574 = sum of:
0.0047212574 = weight(_text_:s in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047212574 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (2004)
0.00
0.001391014 = product of:
0.004173042 = sum of:
0.004173042 = weight(_text_:s in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004173042 = score(doc=3152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Table of Contents Part I: Accepted Papers Christoph Tempich and Raphael Volz: Towards a benchmark for Semantic Web reasoners - an analysis of the DAML ontology library M. Carmen Suarez-Figueroa and Asuncion Gomez-Perez: Results of Taxonomic Evaluation of RDF(S) and DAML+OIL ontologies using RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Validation Tools and Ontology Platforms import services Volker Haarslev and Ralf Möller: Racer: A Core Inference Engine for the Semantic Web Mikhail Kazakov and Habib Abdulrab: DL-workbench: a metamodeling approach to ontology manipulation Thorsten Liebig and Olaf Noppens: OntoTrack: Fast Browsing and Easy Editing of Large Ontologie Frederic Fürst, Michel Leclere, and Francky Trichet: TooCoM : a Tool to Operationalize an Ontology with the Conceptual Graph Model Naoki Sugiura, Masaki Kurematsu, Naoki Fukuta, Noriaki Izumi, and Takahira Yamaguchi: A domain ontology engineering tool with general ontologies and text corpus Howard Goldberg, Alfredo Morales, David MacMillan, and Matthew Quinlan: An Ontology-Driven Application to Improve the Prescription of Educational Resources to Parents of Premature Infants Part II: Experiment Contributions Domain natural language description for the experiment Raphael Troncy, Antoine Isaac, and Veronique Malaise: Using XSLT for Interoperability: DOE and The Travelling Domain Experiment Christian Fillies: SemTalk EON2003 Semantic Web Export / Import Interface Test Óscar Corcho, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Danilo José Guerrero-Rodríguez, David Pérez-Rey, Alberto Ruiz-Cristina, Teresa Sastre-Toral, M. Carmen Suárez-Figueroa: Evaluation experiment of ontology tools' interoperability with the WebODE ontology engineering workbench Holger Knublauch: Case Study: Using Protege to Convert the Travel Ontology to UML and OWL Franz Calvo and John Gennari: Interoperability of Protege 2.0 beta and OilEd 3.5 in the Domain Knowledge of Osteoporosis
-
Davies, J.; Weeks, R.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
0.001391014 = product of:
0.004173042 = sum of:
0.004173042 = weight(_text_:s in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004173042 = score(doc=4320,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An information-seeking system is described which combines traditional keyword querying of WWW resources with the ability to browse and query against RD annotations of those resources. RDF(S) and RDF are used to specify and populate an ontology and the resultant RDF annotations are then indexed along with the full text of the annotated resources. The resultant index allows both keyword querying against the full text of the document and the literal values occurring in the RDF annotations, along with the ability to browse and query the ontology. We motivate our approach as a key enabler for fully exploiting the Semantic Web in the area of knowledge management and argue that the ability to combine searching and browsing behaviours more fully supports a typical information-seeking task. The approach is characterised as "low threshold, high ceiling" in the sense that where RDF annotations exist they are exploited for an improved information-seeking experience but where they do not yet exist, a search capability is still available.
- Pages
- S.40112
-
Hogan, A.; Harth, A.; Umbrich, J.; Kinsella, S.; Polleres, A.; Decker, S.: Searching and browsing Linked Data with SWSE : the Semantic Web Search Engine (2011)
0.00
0.001391014 = product of:
0.004173042 = sum of:
0.004173042 = weight(_text_:s in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004173042 = score(doc=438,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Scheir, P.; Pammer, V.; Lindstaedt, S.N.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : does it exist? (2007)
0.00
0.0013770334 = product of:
0.0041311 = sum of:
0.0041311 = weight(_text_:s in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041311 = score(doc=4329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.252-257
-
Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004)
0.00
0.0013770334 = product of:
0.0041311 = sum of:
0.0041311 = weight(_text_:s in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041311 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
