-
Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008)
0.09
0.088225655 = product of:
0.17645131 = sum of:
0.17645131 = sum of:
0.13708933 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13708933 = score(doc=2654,freq=16.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.039361987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039361987 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012)
0.08
0.083837144 = product of:
0.16767429 = sum of:
0.16767429 = sum of:
0.1259246 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1259246 = score(doc=3197,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.04174969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04174969 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 14:03:22
- RSWK
- Thesaurus
- Subject
- Thesaurus
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013)
0.07
0.07228334 = product of:
0.14456668 = sum of:
0.14456668 = sum of:
0.102817 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102817 = score(doc=662,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.4332261 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
0.04174969 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04174969 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The concept of Linked Data has made its entrance in the cultural heritage sector due to its potential use for the integration of heterogeneous collections and deriving additional value out of existing metadata. However, practitioners and researchers alike need a better understanding of what outcome they can reasonably expect of the reconciliation process between their local metadata and established controlled vocabularies which are already a part of the Linked Data cloud. This paper offers an in-depth analysis of how a locally developed vocabulary can be successfully reconciled with the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and the Arts and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) through the help of a general-purpose tool for interactive data transformation (OpenRefine). Issues negatively affecting the reconciliation process are identified and solutions are proposed in order to derive maximum value from existing metadata and controlled vocabularies in an automated manner.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:29:20
- Object
- Arts and Architecture Thesaurus
-
Subirats, I.; Prasad, A.R.D.; Keizer, J.; Bagdanov, A.: Implementation of rich metadata formats and demantic tools using DSpace (2008)
0.06
0.06238496 = product of:
0.12476992 = sum of:
0.12476992 = sum of:
0.09693679 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09693679 = score(doc=2656,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.027833126 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027833126 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This poster explores the customization of DSpace to allow the use of the AGRIS Application Profile metadata standard and the AGROVOC thesaurus. The objective is the adaptation of DSpace, through the least invasive code changes either in the form of plug-ins or add-ons, to the specific needs of the Agricultural Sciences and Technology community. Metadata standards such as AGRIS AP, and Knowledge Organization Systems such as the AGROVOC thesaurus, provide mechanisms for sharing information in a standardized manner by recommending the use of common semantics and interoperable syntax (Subirats et al., 2007). AGRIS AP was created to enhance the description, exchange and subsequent retrieval of agricultural Document-like Information Objects (DLIOs). It is a metadata schema which draws from Metadata standards such as Dublin Core (DC), the Australian Government Locator Service Metadata (AGLS) and the Agricultural Metadata Element Set (AgMES) namespaces. It allows sharing of information across dispersed bibliographic systems (FAO, 2005). AGROVOC68 is a multilingual structured thesaurus covering agricultural and related domains. Its main role is to standardize the indexing process in order to make searching simpler and more efficient. AGROVOC is developed by FAO (Lauser et al., 2006). The customization of the DSpace is taking place in several phases. First, the AGRIS AP metadata schema was mapped onto the metadata DSpace model, with several enhancements implemented to support AGRIS AP elements. Next, AGROVOC will be integrated as a controlled vocabulary accessed through a local SKOS or OWL file. Eventually the system will be configurable to access AGROVOC through local files or remotely via webservices. Finally, spell checking and tooltips will be incorporated in the user interface to support metadata editing. Adapting DSpace to support AGRIS AP and annotation using the semantically-rich AGROVOC thesaurus transform DSpace into a powerful, domain-specific system for annotation and exchange of bibliographic metadata in the agricultural domain.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014)
0.04
0.03815076 = product of:
0.07630152 = sum of:
0.07630152 = sum of:
0.048468396 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048468396 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.20422474 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.027833126 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027833126 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The growing volumes of semantic data available in the web result in the need for handling the information overload phenomenon. The potential of this amount of data is enormous but in most cases it is very difficult for users to visualize, explore and use this data, especially for lay-users without experience with Semantic Web technologies. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The Visual Information-Seeking Mantra "Overview first, zoom and filter, then details-on-demand" proposed by Shneiderman describes how data should be presented in different stages to achieve an effective exploration. The overview is the first user task when dealing with a data set. The objective is that the user is capable of getting an idea about the overall structure of the data set. Different information architecture (IA) components supporting the overview tasks have been developed, so they are automatically generated from semantic data, and evaluated with end-users. Findings - The chosen IA components are well known to web users, as they are present in most web pages: navigation bars, site maps and site indexes. The authors complement them with Treemaps, a visualization technique for displaying hierarchical data. These components have been developed following an iterative User-Centered Design methodology. Evaluations with end-users have shown that they get easily used to them despite the fact that they are generated automatically from structured data, without requiring knowledge about the underlying semantic technologies, and that the different overview components complement each other as they focus on different information search needs. Originality/value - Obtaining semantic data sets overviews cannot be easily done with the current semantic web browsers. Overviews become difficult to achieve with large heterogeneous data sets, which is typical in the Semantic Web, because traditional IA techniques do not easily scale to large data sets. There is little or no support to obtain overview information quickly and easily at the beginning of the exploration of a new data set. This can be a serious limitation when exploring a data set for the first time, especially for lay-users. The proposal is to reuse and adapt existing IA components to provide this overview to users and show that they can be generated automatically from the thesaurus and ontologies that structure semantic data while providing a comparable user experience to traditional web sites.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Rüther, M.; Fock, J.; Schultz-Krutisch, T.; Bandholtz, T.: Classification and reference vocabulary in linked environment data (2011)
0.03
0.03148115 = product of:
0.0629623 = sum of:
0.0629623 = product of:
0.1259246 = sum of:
0.1259246 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1259246 = score(doc=4816,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 4816, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4816)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Germany, has a long tradition in knowledge organization, using a library along with many Web-based information systems. The backbone of this information space is a classification system enhanced by a reference vocabulary which consists of a thesaurus, a gazetteer and a chronicle. Over the years, classification has increasingly been relegated to the background compared with the reference vocabulary indexing and full text search. Bibliographic items are no longer classified directly but tagged with thesaurus terms, with those terms being classified. Since 2010 we have been developing a linked data representation of this knowledge base. While we are linking bibliographic and observation data with the controlled vocabulary in a Resource Desrcription Framework (RDF) representation, the classification may be revisited as a powerful organization system by inference. This also raises questions about the quality and feasibility of an unambiguous classification of thesaurus terms.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.03
0.027189968 = product of:
0.054379936 = sum of:
0.054379936 = product of:
0.1631398 = sum of:
0.1631398 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1631398 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43541256 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Martínez-González, M.M.; Alvite-Díez, M.L.: Thesauri and Semantic Web : discussion of the evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web (2019)
0.03
0.02623429 = product of:
0.05246858 = sum of:
0.05246858 = product of:
0.10493716 = sum of:
0.10493716 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10493716 = score(doc=5997,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.44215953 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Thesauri are Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), that arise from the consensus of wide communities. They have been in use for many years and are regularly updated. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals for indexing and searching, today there is a demand for conceptual vocabularies that enable inferencing by machines. The development of the Semantic Web has brought a new opportunity for thesauri, but thesauri also face the challenge of proving that they add value to it. The evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web is examined. Elements and structures in the thesaurus standard, ISO 25964, and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the Semantic Web standard for representing KOS, are reviewed and compared. Moreover, the integrity rules of thesauri are contrasted with the axioms of SKOS. How SKOS has been applied to represent some real thesauri is taken into account. Three thesauri are chosen for this aim: AGROVOC, EuroVoc and the UNESCO Thesaurus. Based on the results of this comparison and analysis, the benefits that Semantic Web technologies offer to thesauri, how thesauri can contribute to the Semantic Web, and the challenges that would help to improve their integration with the Semantic Web are discussed.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007)
0.02
0.024353987 = product of:
0.048707973 = sum of:
0.048707973 = product of:
0.09741595 = sum of:
0.09741595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09741595 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006)
0.02
0.024234198 = product of:
0.048468396 = sum of:
0.048468396 = product of:
0.09693679 = sum of:
0.09693679 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09693679 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a conceptual framework and methodology for managing scheme versioning for the Semantic Web. The first part of the paper introduces the concept of vocabulary encoding schemes, distinguished from metadata schemas, and discusses the characteristics of changes in schemes. The paper then presents a proposal to use a value record-similar to a term record in thesaurus management techniques-to manage scheme versioning challenges for the Semantic Web. The conclusion identifies future research directions.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.020874845 = product of:
0.04174969 = sum of:
0.04174969 = product of:
0.08349938 = sum of:
0.08349938 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08349938 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007)
0.02
0.020874845 = product of:
0.04174969 = sum of:
0.04174969 = product of:
0.08349938 = sum of:
0.08349938 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08349938 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.02
0.018175649 = product of:
0.036351297 = sum of:
0.036351297 = product of:
0.072702594 = sum of:
0.072702594 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072702594 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Object
- Art and architecture thesaurus
-
Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016)
0.02
0.017395705 = product of:
0.03479141 = sum of:
0.03479141 = product of:
0.06958282 = sum of:
0.06958282 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06958282 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Miles, A.; Matthews, B.; Beckett, D.; Brickley, D.; Wilson, M.; Rogers, N.: SKOS: A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web (2005)
0.01
0.014994145 = product of:
0.02998829 = sum of:
0.02998829 = product of:
0.05997658 = sum of:
0.05997658 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05997658 = score(doc=517,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.25271523 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This type of effort is common in the digital library community, where a group of experts will interact with a user community to create a thesaurus for a specific domain (e.g. the Art & Architecture Thesaurus AAT AAT) or an overarching classification scheme (e.g. the Dewey Decimal Classification). A similar type of activity is being undertaken more recently in a less centralised manner by web communities, producing for example the DMOZ web directory DMOZ, or the Topic Exchange for weblog topics Topic Exchange. The web, including the semantic web, provides a medium within which communities can interact and collaboratively build and use vocabularies of concepts. A simple language is required that allows these communities to express the structure and content of their vocabularies in a machine-understandable way, enabling exchange and reuse. The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is an ideal language for making statements about web resources and publishing metadata. However, RDF provides only the low level semantics required to form metadata statements. RDF vocabularies must be built on top of RDF to support the expression of more specific types of information within metadata. Ontology languages such as OWL OWL add a layer of expressive power to RDF, and provide powerful tools for defining complex conceptual structures, which can be used to generate rich metadata. However, the class-oriented, logically precise modelling required to construct useful web ontologies is demanding in terms of expertise, effort, and therefore cost. In many cases this type of modelling may be superfluous or unsuited to requirements. Therefore there is a need for a language for expressing vocabularies of concepts for use in semantically rich metadata, that is powerful enough to support semantically enhanced search, but simple enough to be undemanding in terms of the cost and expertise required to use it."
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.013916563 = product of:
0.027833126 = sum of:
0.027833126 = product of:
0.055666253 = sum of:
0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055666253 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.013916563 = product of:
0.027833126 = sum of:
0.027833126 = product of:
0.055666253 = sum of:
0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055666253 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008)
0.01
0.012176993 = product of:
0.024353987 = sum of:
0.024353987 = product of:
0.048707973 = sum of:
0.048707973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048707973 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.012176993 = product of:
0.024353987 = sum of:
0.024353987 = product of:
0.048707973 = sum of:
0.048707973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048707973 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000)
0.01
0.012176993 = product of:
0.024353987 = sum of:
0.024353987 = product of:
0.048707973 = sum of:
0.048707973 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048707973 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 5.2013 19:22:18
