Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.01
    0.0062368447 = product of:
      0.037421066 = sum of:
        0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021967318 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
        0.015453748 = product of:
          0.030907497 = sum of:
            0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030907497 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  2. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.00
    0.0022076783 = product of:
      0.02649214 = sum of:
        0.02649214 = product of:
          0.05298428 = sum of:
            0.05298428 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05298428 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  3. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.00
    0.001839732 = product of:
      0.022076784 = sum of:
        0.022076784 = product of:
          0.044153567 = sum of:
            0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044153567 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  4. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.00
    0.0014717856 = product of:
      0.017661426 = sum of:
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  5. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.00
    0.0014717856 = product of:
      0.017661426 = sum of:
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  6. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.00
    0.0014717856 = product of:
      0.017661426 = sum of:
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  7. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.00
    0.0012878124 = product of:
      0.015453748 = sum of:
        0.015453748 = product of:
          0.030907497 = sum of:
            0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030907497 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27
  8. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.00
    0.0011038391 = product of:
      0.01324607 = sum of:
        0.01324607 = product of:
          0.02649214 = sum of:
            0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02649214 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  9. Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007) 0.00
    0.0010460628 = product of:
      0.012552753 = sum of:
        0.012552753 = weight(_text_:internet in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012552753 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Therefore our main research questions are as follows: - Is it possible to discover regular patterns in tag usage and to establish a stable category model? - Does a specific tagging language comparable to internet slang or chatspeak evolve? - How do social tags differ from traditional (author / expert) keywords? - To what degree are social tags taken from or findable in the full text of the tagged resource? - Do tags in a research literature context go beyond simple content description (e.g. tags indicating time or task-related information, cf. Kipp et al. 2006)?
  10. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2009) 0.00
    9.19866E-4 = product of:
      0.011038392 = sum of:
        0.011038392 = product of:
          0.022076784 = sum of:
            0.022076784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022076784 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Content
    This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.